Cargando…

An Updated Meta-Analysis on Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention Stratified by Baseline Surgical Risk and Device Type

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) can lead to the embolization of debris. Capturing the debris by cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices may reduce the risk of stroke. New evidence has allowed us to examine the effects of CEP in patients undergoing TAVI. We aimed to asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Safi U., Zahid, Salman, Alkhouli, Mohamad A., Akbar, Usman Ali, Zaid, Syed, Arshad, Hassaan B., Little, Stephen H., Reardon, Michael J., Kleiman, Neal S., Goel, Sachin S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shj.2023.100178
_version_ 1785080794555875328
author Khan, Safi U.
Zahid, Salman
Alkhouli, Mohamad A.
Akbar, Usman Ali
Zaid, Syed
Arshad, Hassaan B.
Little, Stephen H.
Reardon, Michael J.
Kleiman, Neal S.
Goel, Sachin S.
author_facet Khan, Safi U.
Zahid, Salman
Alkhouli, Mohamad A.
Akbar, Usman Ali
Zaid, Syed
Arshad, Hassaan B.
Little, Stephen H.
Reardon, Michael J.
Kleiman, Neal S.
Goel, Sachin S.
author_sort Khan, Safi U.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) can lead to the embolization of debris. Capturing the debris by cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices may reduce the risk of stroke. New evidence has allowed us to examine the effects of CEP in patients undergoing TAVI. We aimed to assess the effects of CEP overall and stratified by the device used (SENTINEL or TriGuard) and the surgical risk of the patients. METHODS: We selected randomized controlled trials using electronic databases through September 17, 2022. We estimated random-effects risk ratios (RR) with (95% confidence interval) and calculated absolute risk differences at 30 days across baseline surgical risks derived from the TAVI trials for any stroke (disabling and nondisabling) and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among 6 trials (n = 3921), CEP vs. control did not reduce any stroke [RR: 0.95 (0.50-1.81)], disabling [RR: 0.75 (0.18-3.16)] or nondisabling [RR: 0.99 (0.65-1.49)] strokes, or all-cause mortality [RR: 1.23 (0.55-2.77)]. However, when analyzed by device, SENTINEL reduced disabling stroke [RR: 0.46 (0.22-0.95)], translating into 6 fewer per 1000 in high-risk, 3 fewer per 1000 in intermediate-risk, and 1 fewer per 1000 in low surgical-risk patients. CEP vs. control did not reduce the risk of any bleeding [RR: 1.03 (0.44-2.40)], major vascular complications [RR: 1.41 (0.57-3.48)], or acute kidney injury [RR: 1.36 (0.57-3.28)]. CONCLUSIONS: This updated meta-analysis showed that SENTINEL CEP might reduce disabling stroke in patients undergoing TAVI. Patients with high and intermediate surgical risks were most likely to derive benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10382981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103829812023-07-30 An Updated Meta-Analysis on Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention Stratified by Baseline Surgical Risk and Device Type Khan, Safi U. Zahid, Salman Alkhouli, Mohamad A. Akbar, Usman Ali Zaid, Syed Arshad, Hassaan B. Little, Stephen H. Reardon, Michael J. Kleiman, Neal S. Goel, Sachin S. Struct Heart Original Research BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) can lead to the embolization of debris. Capturing the debris by cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices may reduce the risk of stroke. New evidence has allowed us to examine the effects of CEP in patients undergoing TAVI. We aimed to assess the effects of CEP overall and stratified by the device used (SENTINEL or TriGuard) and the surgical risk of the patients. METHODS: We selected randomized controlled trials using electronic databases through September 17, 2022. We estimated random-effects risk ratios (RR) with (95% confidence interval) and calculated absolute risk differences at 30 days across baseline surgical risks derived from the TAVI trials for any stroke (disabling and nondisabling) and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among 6 trials (n = 3921), CEP vs. control did not reduce any stroke [RR: 0.95 (0.50-1.81)], disabling [RR: 0.75 (0.18-3.16)] or nondisabling [RR: 0.99 (0.65-1.49)] strokes, or all-cause mortality [RR: 1.23 (0.55-2.77)]. However, when analyzed by device, SENTINEL reduced disabling stroke [RR: 0.46 (0.22-0.95)], translating into 6 fewer per 1000 in high-risk, 3 fewer per 1000 in intermediate-risk, and 1 fewer per 1000 in low surgical-risk patients. CEP vs. control did not reduce the risk of any bleeding [RR: 1.03 (0.44-2.40)], major vascular complications [RR: 1.41 (0.57-3.48)], or acute kidney injury [RR: 1.36 (0.57-3.28)]. CONCLUSIONS: This updated meta-analysis showed that SENTINEL CEP might reduce disabling stroke in patients undergoing TAVI. Patients with high and intermediate surgical risks were most likely to derive benefits. Elsevier 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10382981/ /pubmed/37520141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shj.2023.100178 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Khan, Safi U.
Zahid, Salman
Alkhouli, Mohamad A.
Akbar, Usman Ali
Zaid, Syed
Arshad, Hassaan B.
Little, Stephen H.
Reardon, Michael J.
Kleiman, Neal S.
Goel, Sachin S.
An Updated Meta-Analysis on Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention Stratified by Baseline Surgical Risk and Device Type
title An Updated Meta-Analysis on Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention Stratified by Baseline Surgical Risk and Device Type
title_full An Updated Meta-Analysis on Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention Stratified by Baseline Surgical Risk and Device Type
title_fullStr An Updated Meta-Analysis on Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention Stratified by Baseline Surgical Risk and Device Type
title_full_unstemmed An Updated Meta-Analysis on Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention Stratified by Baseline Surgical Risk and Device Type
title_short An Updated Meta-Analysis on Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention Stratified by Baseline Surgical Risk and Device Type
title_sort updated meta-analysis on cerebral embolic protection in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve intervention stratified by baseline surgical risk and device type
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shj.2023.100178
work_keys_str_mv AT khansafiu anupdatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT zahidsalman anupdatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT alkhoulimohamada anupdatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT akbarusmanali anupdatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT zaidsyed anupdatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT arshadhassaanb anupdatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT littlestephenh anupdatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT reardonmichaelj anupdatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT kleimanneals anupdatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT goelsachins anupdatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT khansafiu updatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT zahidsalman updatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT alkhoulimohamada updatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT akbarusmanali updatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT zaidsyed updatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT arshadhassaanb updatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT littlestephenh updatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT reardonmichaelj updatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT kleimanneals updatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype
AT goelsachins updatedmetaanalysisoncerebralembolicprotectioninpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalveinterventionstratifiedbybaselinesurgicalriskanddevicetype