Cargando…

Inconsistent Effects of Glatiramer Acetate Treatment in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that involves strong inflammatory components. Aberrant and prolonged inflammation in the CNS is thought to contribute to the development of the pathology. The use of single cytokine approaches to curb or leverage inflammatory mechanism...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karaahmet, Berke, Olschowka, John A., O’Banion, M. Kerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10383120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37513996
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071809
_version_ 1785080828740501504
author Karaahmet, Berke
Olschowka, John A.
O’Banion, M. Kerry
author_facet Karaahmet, Berke
Olschowka, John A.
O’Banion, M. Kerry
author_sort Karaahmet, Berke
collection PubMed
description Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that involves strong inflammatory components. Aberrant and prolonged inflammation in the CNS is thought to contribute to the development of the pathology. The use of single cytokine approaches to curb or leverage inflammatory mechanisms for disease modifying benefit has often resulted in conflicting data. Furthermore, these treatments were usually delivered locally into the CNS parenchyma, complicating translational efforts. To overcome these hurdles, we tested the use of glatiramer acetate (GA) in reducing amyloid beta (Aβ) plaque pathology in the 5xFAD model of AD. GA immunizations were begun at the ages of 2.5 months, 5.5 months, and 8.5 months, and GA was delivered weekly for 8 weeks. While previous data describe potential benefits of GA immunization in decreasing Aβ levels in murine models of AD, we found modest decreases in Aβ levels if given during the development of pathology but, surprisingly, found increased Aβ levels if GA was administered at later stages. The impact of GA treatment was only significant for female mice. Furthermore, we observed no changes between microglial uptake of plaque, CD11c immunopositivity of microglia, or levels of TMEM119 and P2Ry12 on microglia. Overall, these data warrant exercising caution when aiming to repurpose GA for AD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10383120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103831202023-07-30 Inconsistent Effects of Glatiramer Acetate Treatment in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Karaahmet, Berke Olschowka, John A. O’Banion, M. Kerry Pharmaceutics Article Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that involves strong inflammatory components. Aberrant and prolonged inflammation in the CNS is thought to contribute to the development of the pathology. The use of single cytokine approaches to curb or leverage inflammatory mechanisms for disease modifying benefit has often resulted in conflicting data. Furthermore, these treatments were usually delivered locally into the CNS parenchyma, complicating translational efforts. To overcome these hurdles, we tested the use of glatiramer acetate (GA) in reducing amyloid beta (Aβ) plaque pathology in the 5xFAD model of AD. GA immunizations were begun at the ages of 2.5 months, 5.5 months, and 8.5 months, and GA was delivered weekly for 8 weeks. While previous data describe potential benefits of GA immunization in decreasing Aβ levels in murine models of AD, we found modest decreases in Aβ levels if given during the development of pathology but, surprisingly, found increased Aβ levels if GA was administered at later stages. The impact of GA treatment was only significant for female mice. Furthermore, we observed no changes between microglial uptake of plaque, CD11c immunopositivity of microglia, or levels of TMEM119 and P2Ry12 on microglia. Overall, these data warrant exercising caution when aiming to repurpose GA for AD. MDPI 2023-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10383120/ /pubmed/37513996 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071809 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Karaahmet, Berke
Olschowka, John A.
O’Banion, M. Kerry
Inconsistent Effects of Glatiramer Acetate Treatment in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease
title Inconsistent Effects of Glatiramer Acetate Treatment in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full Inconsistent Effects of Glatiramer Acetate Treatment in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease
title_fullStr Inconsistent Effects of Glatiramer Acetate Treatment in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Inconsistent Effects of Glatiramer Acetate Treatment in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease
title_short Inconsistent Effects of Glatiramer Acetate Treatment in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease
title_sort inconsistent effects of glatiramer acetate treatment in the 5xfad mouse model of alzheimer’s disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10383120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37513996
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071809
work_keys_str_mv AT karaahmetberke inconsistenteffectsofglatirameracetatetreatmentinthe5xfadmousemodelofalzheimersdisease
AT olschowkajohna inconsistenteffectsofglatirameracetatetreatmentinthe5xfadmousemodelofalzheimersdisease
AT obanionmkerry inconsistenteffectsofglatirameracetatetreatmentinthe5xfadmousemodelofalzheimersdisease