Cargando…

Composite Interventions on Outcomes of Severely and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China

Background: The sixty-day effects of initial composite interventions for the treatment of severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 are not fully assessed. Methods: Using a Bayesian piecewise exponential model, we analyzed the 60-day mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Jiasheng, Fan, Rong, Guo, Chengnan, Huang, Xuyuan, Guo, Runsheng, Zhang, Fengdi, Hu, Jianrong, Huang, Gang, Cao, Liou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10383482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37513031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071859
_version_ 1785080921160941568
author Shao, Jiasheng
Fan, Rong
Guo, Chengnan
Huang, Xuyuan
Guo, Runsheng
Zhang, Fengdi
Hu, Jianrong
Huang, Gang
Cao, Liou
author_facet Shao, Jiasheng
Fan, Rong
Guo, Chengnan
Huang, Xuyuan
Guo, Runsheng
Zhang, Fengdi
Hu, Jianrong
Huang, Gang
Cao, Liou
author_sort Shao, Jiasheng
collection PubMed
description Background: The sixty-day effects of initial composite interventions for the treatment of severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 are not fully assessed. Methods: Using a Bayesian piecewise exponential model, we analyzed the 60-day mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and disability in 1082 severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 between 8 December 2022 and 9 February 2023 in Shanghai, China. The final 60-day follow-up was completed on 10 April 2023. Results: Among 1082 patients (mean age, 78.0 years, 421 [38.9%] women), 139 patients (12.9%) died within 60 days. Azvudine had a 99.8% probability of improving 2-month survival (adjusted HR, 0.44 [95% credible interval, 0.24–0.79]), and Paxlovid had a 91.9% probability of improving 2-month survival (adjusted HR, 0.71 [95% credible interval, 0.44–1.14]) compared with the control. IL-6 receptor antagonist, baricitinib and a-thymosin each had a high probability of benefit (99.5%, 99.4%, and 97.5%, respectively) compared to their controls, while the probability of trail-defined statistical futility (HR > 0.83) was high for therapeutic anticoagulation (99.8%; HR, 1.64 [95% CrI, 1.06–2.50]) and glucocorticoid (91.4%; HR, 1.20 [95% CrI, 0.71–2.16]). Paxlovid, Azvudine, and therapeutic anticoagulation showed a significant reduction in disability (p < 0.05) Conclusions: Among severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 who received 1 or more therapeutic interventions, treatment with Azvudine had a high probability of improved 60-day mortality compared with the control, indicating its potential in a resource-limited scenario. Treatment with an IL-6 receptor antagonist, baricitinib, and a-thymosin also had high probabilities of benefit in improving 2-month survival, among which a-thymosin could improve HRQoL. Treatment with Paxlovid, Azvudine, and therapeutic anticoagulation could significantly reduce disability at day 60.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10383482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103834822023-07-30 Composite Interventions on Outcomes of Severely and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China Shao, Jiasheng Fan, Rong Guo, Chengnan Huang, Xuyuan Guo, Runsheng Zhang, Fengdi Hu, Jianrong Huang, Gang Cao, Liou Microorganisms Article Background: The sixty-day effects of initial composite interventions for the treatment of severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 are not fully assessed. Methods: Using a Bayesian piecewise exponential model, we analyzed the 60-day mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and disability in 1082 severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 between 8 December 2022 and 9 February 2023 in Shanghai, China. The final 60-day follow-up was completed on 10 April 2023. Results: Among 1082 patients (mean age, 78.0 years, 421 [38.9%] women), 139 patients (12.9%) died within 60 days. Azvudine had a 99.8% probability of improving 2-month survival (adjusted HR, 0.44 [95% credible interval, 0.24–0.79]), and Paxlovid had a 91.9% probability of improving 2-month survival (adjusted HR, 0.71 [95% credible interval, 0.44–1.14]) compared with the control. IL-6 receptor antagonist, baricitinib and a-thymosin each had a high probability of benefit (99.5%, 99.4%, and 97.5%, respectively) compared to their controls, while the probability of trail-defined statistical futility (HR > 0.83) was high for therapeutic anticoagulation (99.8%; HR, 1.64 [95% CrI, 1.06–2.50]) and glucocorticoid (91.4%; HR, 1.20 [95% CrI, 0.71–2.16]). Paxlovid, Azvudine, and therapeutic anticoagulation showed a significant reduction in disability (p < 0.05) Conclusions: Among severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 who received 1 or more therapeutic interventions, treatment with Azvudine had a high probability of improved 60-day mortality compared with the control, indicating its potential in a resource-limited scenario. Treatment with an IL-6 receptor antagonist, baricitinib, and a-thymosin also had high probabilities of benefit in improving 2-month survival, among which a-thymosin could improve HRQoL. Treatment with Paxlovid, Azvudine, and therapeutic anticoagulation could significantly reduce disability at day 60. MDPI 2023-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10383482/ /pubmed/37513031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071859 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shao, Jiasheng
Fan, Rong
Guo, Chengnan
Huang, Xuyuan
Guo, Runsheng
Zhang, Fengdi
Hu, Jianrong
Huang, Gang
Cao, Liou
Composite Interventions on Outcomes of Severely and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China
title Composite Interventions on Outcomes of Severely and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China
title_full Composite Interventions on Outcomes of Severely and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China
title_fullStr Composite Interventions on Outcomes of Severely and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China
title_full_unstemmed Composite Interventions on Outcomes of Severely and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China
title_short Composite Interventions on Outcomes of Severely and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China
title_sort composite interventions on outcomes of severely and critically ill patients with covid-19 in shanghai, china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10383482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37513031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071859
work_keys_str_mv AT shaojiasheng compositeinterventionsonoutcomesofseverelyandcriticallyillpatientswithcovid19inshanghaichina
AT fanrong compositeinterventionsonoutcomesofseverelyandcriticallyillpatientswithcovid19inshanghaichina
AT guochengnan compositeinterventionsonoutcomesofseverelyandcriticallyillpatientswithcovid19inshanghaichina
AT huangxuyuan compositeinterventionsonoutcomesofseverelyandcriticallyillpatientswithcovid19inshanghaichina
AT guorunsheng compositeinterventionsonoutcomesofseverelyandcriticallyillpatientswithcovid19inshanghaichina
AT zhangfengdi compositeinterventionsonoutcomesofseverelyandcriticallyillpatientswithcovid19inshanghaichina
AT hujianrong compositeinterventionsonoutcomesofseverelyandcriticallyillpatientswithcovid19inshanghaichina
AT huanggang compositeinterventionsonoutcomesofseverelyandcriticallyillpatientswithcovid19inshanghaichina
AT caoliou compositeinterventionsonoutcomesofseverelyandcriticallyillpatientswithcovid19inshanghaichina