Cargando…

The Effectiveness of a UAV-Based LiDAR Survey to Develop Digital Terrain Models and Topographic Texture Analyses

This study presents a comparison of data acquired from three LiDAR sensors from different manufacturers, i.e., Yellow Scan Mapper (YSM), AlphaAir 450 Airborne LiDAR System CHC Navigation (CHC) and DJI Zenmuse L1 (L1). The same area was surveyed with laser sensors mounted on the DIJ Matrice 300 RTK U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartmiński, Piotr, Siłuch, Marcin, Kociuba, Waldemar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10383832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37514709
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146415
_version_ 1785081007856156672
author Bartmiński, Piotr
Siłuch, Marcin
Kociuba, Waldemar
author_facet Bartmiński, Piotr
Siłuch, Marcin
Kociuba, Waldemar
author_sort Bartmiński, Piotr
collection PubMed
description This study presents a comparison of data acquired from three LiDAR sensors from different manufacturers, i.e., Yellow Scan Mapper (YSM), AlphaAir 450 Airborne LiDAR System CHC Navigation (CHC) and DJI Zenmuse L1 (L1). The same area was surveyed with laser sensors mounted on the DIJ Matrice 300 RTK UAV platform. In order to compare the data, a diverse test area located in the north-western part of the Lublin Province in eastern Poland was selected. The test area was a gully system with high vegetation cover. In order to compare the UAV information, LiDAR reference data were used, which were collected within the ISOK project (acquired for the whole area of Poland). In order to examine the differentiation of the acquired data, both classified point clouds and DTM products calculated on the basis of point clouds acquired from individual sensors were compared. The analyses showed that the largest average height differences between terrain models calculated from point clouds were recorded between the CHC sensor and the base data, exceeding 2.5 m. The smallest differences were recorded between the L1 sensor and ISOK data—RMSE was 0.31 m. The use of UAVs to acquire very high resolution data can only be used locally and must be subject to very stringent landing site preparation procedures, as well as data processing in DTM and its derivatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10383832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103838322023-07-30 The Effectiveness of a UAV-Based LiDAR Survey to Develop Digital Terrain Models and Topographic Texture Analyses Bartmiński, Piotr Siłuch, Marcin Kociuba, Waldemar Sensors (Basel) Article This study presents a comparison of data acquired from three LiDAR sensors from different manufacturers, i.e., Yellow Scan Mapper (YSM), AlphaAir 450 Airborne LiDAR System CHC Navigation (CHC) and DJI Zenmuse L1 (L1). The same area was surveyed with laser sensors mounted on the DIJ Matrice 300 RTK UAV platform. In order to compare the data, a diverse test area located in the north-western part of the Lublin Province in eastern Poland was selected. The test area was a gully system with high vegetation cover. In order to compare the UAV information, LiDAR reference data were used, which were collected within the ISOK project (acquired for the whole area of Poland). In order to examine the differentiation of the acquired data, both classified point clouds and DTM products calculated on the basis of point clouds acquired from individual sensors were compared. The analyses showed that the largest average height differences between terrain models calculated from point clouds were recorded between the CHC sensor and the base data, exceeding 2.5 m. The smallest differences were recorded between the L1 sensor and ISOK data—RMSE was 0.31 m. The use of UAVs to acquire very high resolution data can only be used locally and must be subject to very stringent landing site preparation procedures, as well as data processing in DTM and its derivatives. MDPI 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10383832/ /pubmed/37514709 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146415 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bartmiński, Piotr
Siłuch, Marcin
Kociuba, Waldemar
The Effectiveness of a UAV-Based LiDAR Survey to Develop Digital Terrain Models and Topographic Texture Analyses
title The Effectiveness of a UAV-Based LiDAR Survey to Develop Digital Terrain Models and Topographic Texture Analyses
title_full The Effectiveness of a UAV-Based LiDAR Survey to Develop Digital Terrain Models and Topographic Texture Analyses
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of a UAV-Based LiDAR Survey to Develop Digital Terrain Models and Topographic Texture Analyses
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of a UAV-Based LiDAR Survey to Develop Digital Terrain Models and Topographic Texture Analyses
title_short The Effectiveness of a UAV-Based LiDAR Survey to Develop Digital Terrain Models and Topographic Texture Analyses
title_sort effectiveness of a uav-based lidar survey to develop digital terrain models and topographic texture analyses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10383832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37514709
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146415
work_keys_str_mv AT bartminskipiotr theeffectivenessofauavbasedlidarsurveytodevelopdigitalterrainmodelsandtopographictextureanalyses
AT siłuchmarcin theeffectivenessofauavbasedlidarsurveytodevelopdigitalterrainmodelsandtopographictextureanalyses
AT kociubawaldemar theeffectivenessofauavbasedlidarsurveytodevelopdigitalterrainmodelsandtopographictextureanalyses
AT bartminskipiotr effectivenessofauavbasedlidarsurveytodevelopdigitalterrainmodelsandtopographictextureanalyses
AT siłuchmarcin effectivenessofauavbasedlidarsurveytodevelopdigitalterrainmodelsandtopographictextureanalyses
AT kociubawaldemar effectivenessofauavbasedlidarsurveytodevelopdigitalterrainmodelsandtopographictextureanalyses