Cargando…

Evaluation of Three Soil Moisture Profile Sensors Using Laboratory and Field Experiments

Soil moisture profile sensors (SMPSs) have a high potential for climate-smart agriculture due to their easy handling and ability to perform simultaneous measurements at different depths. To date, an accurate and easy-to-use method for the evaluation of long SMPSs is not available. In this study, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieberding, Felix, Huisman, Johan Alexander, Huebner, Christof, Schilling, Bernd, Weuthen, Ansgar, Bogena, Heye Reemt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10384149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37514878
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146581
_version_ 1785081086329487360
author Nieberding, Felix
Huisman, Johan Alexander
Huebner, Christof
Schilling, Bernd
Weuthen, Ansgar
Bogena, Heye Reemt
author_facet Nieberding, Felix
Huisman, Johan Alexander
Huebner, Christof
Schilling, Bernd
Weuthen, Ansgar
Bogena, Heye Reemt
author_sort Nieberding, Felix
collection PubMed
description Soil moisture profile sensors (SMPSs) have a high potential for climate-smart agriculture due to their easy handling and ability to perform simultaneous measurements at different depths. To date, an accurate and easy-to-use method for the evaluation of long SMPSs is not available. In this study, we developed laboratory and field experiments to evaluate three different SMPSs (SoilVUE10, Drill&Drop, and SMT500) in terms of measurement accuracy, sensor-to-sensor variability, and temperature stability. The laboratory experiment features a temperature-controlled lysimeter to evaluate intra-sensor variability and temperature stability of SMPSs. The field experiment features a water level-controlled sandbox and reference TDR measurements to evaluate the soil water measurement accuracy of the SMPS. In both experiments, a well-characterized fine sand was used as measurement medium to ensure homogeneous dielectric properties in the measurement domain of the sensors. The laboratory experiments with the lysimeter showed that the Drill&Drop sensor has the highest temperature sensitivity with a decrease of 0.014 m(3) m(−3) per 10 °C, but at the same time showed the lowest intra- and inter-sensor variability. The field experiment with the sandbox showed that all three SMPSs have a similar performance (average RMSE ≈ 0.023 m(3) m(−3)) with higher uncertainties at intermediate soil moisture contents. The presented combination of laboratory and field tests were found to be well suited to evaluate the performance of SMPSs and will be used to test additional SMPSs in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10384149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103841492023-07-30 Evaluation of Three Soil Moisture Profile Sensors Using Laboratory and Field Experiments Nieberding, Felix Huisman, Johan Alexander Huebner, Christof Schilling, Bernd Weuthen, Ansgar Bogena, Heye Reemt Sensors (Basel) Article Soil moisture profile sensors (SMPSs) have a high potential for climate-smart agriculture due to their easy handling and ability to perform simultaneous measurements at different depths. To date, an accurate and easy-to-use method for the evaluation of long SMPSs is not available. In this study, we developed laboratory and field experiments to evaluate three different SMPSs (SoilVUE10, Drill&Drop, and SMT500) in terms of measurement accuracy, sensor-to-sensor variability, and temperature stability. The laboratory experiment features a temperature-controlled lysimeter to evaluate intra-sensor variability and temperature stability of SMPSs. The field experiment features a water level-controlled sandbox and reference TDR measurements to evaluate the soil water measurement accuracy of the SMPS. In both experiments, a well-characterized fine sand was used as measurement medium to ensure homogeneous dielectric properties in the measurement domain of the sensors. The laboratory experiments with the lysimeter showed that the Drill&Drop sensor has the highest temperature sensitivity with a decrease of 0.014 m(3) m(−3) per 10 °C, but at the same time showed the lowest intra- and inter-sensor variability. The field experiment with the sandbox showed that all three SMPSs have a similar performance (average RMSE ≈ 0.023 m(3) m(−3)) with higher uncertainties at intermediate soil moisture contents. The presented combination of laboratory and field tests were found to be well suited to evaluate the performance of SMPSs and will be used to test additional SMPSs in the future. MDPI 2023-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10384149/ /pubmed/37514878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146581 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nieberding, Felix
Huisman, Johan Alexander
Huebner, Christof
Schilling, Bernd
Weuthen, Ansgar
Bogena, Heye Reemt
Evaluation of Three Soil Moisture Profile Sensors Using Laboratory and Field Experiments
title Evaluation of Three Soil Moisture Profile Sensors Using Laboratory and Field Experiments
title_full Evaluation of Three Soil Moisture Profile Sensors Using Laboratory and Field Experiments
title_fullStr Evaluation of Three Soil Moisture Profile Sensors Using Laboratory and Field Experiments
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Three Soil Moisture Profile Sensors Using Laboratory and Field Experiments
title_short Evaluation of Three Soil Moisture Profile Sensors Using Laboratory and Field Experiments
title_sort evaluation of three soil moisture profile sensors using laboratory and field experiments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10384149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37514878
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146581
work_keys_str_mv AT nieberdingfelix evaluationofthreesoilmoistureprofilesensorsusinglaboratoryandfieldexperiments
AT huismanjohanalexander evaluationofthreesoilmoistureprofilesensorsusinglaboratoryandfieldexperiments
AT huebnerchristof evaluationofthreesoilmoistureprofilesensorsusinglaboratoryandfieldexperiments
AT schillingbernd evaluationofthreesoilmoistureprofilesensorsusinglaboratoryandfieldexperiments
AT weuthenansgar evaluationofthreesoilmoistureprofilesensorsusinglaboratoryandfieldexperiments
AT bogenaheyereemt evaluationofthreesoilmoistureprofilesensorsusinglaboratoryandfieldexperiments