Cargando…
Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry
Background and Objectives: Sperm DNA fragmentation refers to any break in one or both of the strands of DNA in the head of a sperm. The most widely used methodologies for assessing sperm DNA fragmentation are the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), the sperm chromatin dispersion assay (SCD), the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10384605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37512124 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071313 |
_version_ | 1785081198431698944 |
---|---|
author | Chatzimeletiou, Katerina Fleva, Alexandra Nikolopoulos, Theodoros-Thomas Markopoulou, Maria Zervakakou, Glykeria Papanikolaou, Kyriakos Anifandis, George Gianakou, Anastasia Grimbizis, Grigoris |
author_facet | Chatzimeletiou, Katerina Fleva, Alexandra Nikolopoulos, Theodoros-Thomas Markopoulou, Maria Zervakakou, Glykeria Papanikolaou, Kyriakos Anifandis, George Gianakou, Anastasia Grimbizis, Grigoris |
author_sort | Chatzimeletiou, Katerina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: Sperm DNA fragmentation refers to any break in one or both of the strands of DNA in the head of a sperm. The most widely used methodologies for assessing sperm DNA fragmentation are the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), the sperm chromatin dispersion assay (SCD), the single-cell gel electrophoresis assay (SCGE–comet), and the terminal-deoxynucleotidyl-transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency and sensitivity of the analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. Materials and Methods: Semen samples were collected and analyzed for standard characteristics using light microscopy, and for sperm DNA fragmentation using both TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. Results: There were no significant differences in the values of the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) obtained when the analysis was performed using TUNEL or flow cytometry (p = 0.543). Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between sperm motility (%) and sperm DNA fragmentation (p < 0.01), as well as between sperm concentration and sperm DNA fragmentation (p < 0.05). The Mann–Whitney U test showed no significant difference in the DFI among couples with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and miscarriages (p = 0.352). Conclusions: Both methods (TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry) have a high efficiency and sensitivity in accurately detecting sperm DNA fragmentation, and can be effectively used to assess male fertility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10384605 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103846052023-07-30 Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry Chatzimeletiou, Katerina Fleva, Alexandra Nikolopoulos, Theodoros-Thomas Markopoulou, Maria Zervakakou, Glykeria Papanikolaou, Kyriakos Anifandis, George Gianakou, Anastasia Grimbizis, Grigoris Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Sperm DNA fragmentation refers to any break in one or both of the strands of DNA in the head of a sperm. The most widely used methodologies for assessing sperm DNA fragmentation are the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), the sperm chromatin dispersion assay (SCD), the single-cell gel electrophoresis assay (SCGE–comet), and the terminal-deoxynucleotidyl-transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency and sensitivity of the analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. Materials and Methods: Semen samples were collected and analyzed for standard characteristics using light microscopy, and for sperm DNA fragmentation using both TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. Results: There were no significant differences in the values of the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) obtained when the analysis was performed using TUNEL or flow cytometry (p = 0.543). Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between sperm motility (%) and sperm DNA fragmentation (p < 0.01), as well as between sperm concentration and sperm DNA fragmentation (p < 0.05). The Mann–Whitney U test showed no significant difference in the DFI among couples with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and miscarriages (p = 0.352). Conclusions: Both methods (TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry) have a high efficiency and sensitivity in accurately detecting sperm DNA fragmentation, and can be effectively used to assess male fertility. MDPI 2023-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10384605/ /pubmed/37512124 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071313 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chatzimeletiou, Katerina Fleva, Alexandra Nikolopoulos, Theodoros-Thomas Markopoulou, Maria Zervakakou, Glykeria Papanikolaou, Kyriakos Anifandis, George Gianakou, Anastasia Grimbizis, Grigoris Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry |
title | Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry |
title_full | Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry |
title_short | Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry |
title_sort | evaluation of sperm dna fragmentation using two different methods: tunel via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10384605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37512124 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chatzimeletioukaterina evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry AT flevaalexandra evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry AT nikolopoulostheodorosthomas evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry AT markopouloumaria evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry AT zervakakouglykeria evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry AT papanikolaoukyriakos evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry AT anifandisgeorge evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry AT gianakouanastasia evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry AT grimbizisgrigoris evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry |