Cargando…

Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry

Background and Objectives: Sperm DNA fragmentation refers to any break in one or both of the strands of DNA in the head of a sperm. The most widely used methodologies for assessing sperm DNA fragmentation are the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), the sperm chromatin dispersion assay (SCD), the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chatzimeletiou, Katerina, Fleva, Alexandra, Nikolopoulos, Theodoros-Thomas, Markopoulou, Maria, Zervakakou, Glykeria, Papanikolaou, Kyriakos, Anifandis, George, Gianakou, Anastasia, Grimbizis, Grigoris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10384605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37512124
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071313
_version_ 1785081198431698944
author Chatzimeletiou, Katerina
Fleva, Alexandra
Nikolopoulos, Theodoros-Thomas
Markopoulou, Maria
Zervakakou, Glykeria
Papanikolaou, Kyriakos
Anifandis, George
Gianakou, Anastasia
Grimbizis, Grigoris
author_facet Chatzimeletiou, Katerina
Fleva, Alexandra
Nikolopoulos, Theodoros-Thomas
Markopoulou, Maria
Zervakakou, Glykeria
Papanikolaou, Kyriakos
Anifandis, George
Gianakou, Anastasia
Grimbizis, Grigoris
author_sort Chatzimeletiou, Katerina
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Sperm DNA fragmentation refers to any break in one or both of the strands of DNA in the head of a sperm. The most widely used methodologies for assessing sperm DNA fragmentation are the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), the sperm chromatin dispersion assay (SCD), the single-cell gel electrophoresis assay (SCGE–comet), and the terminal-deoxynucleotidyl-transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency and sensitivity of the analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. Materials and Methods: Semen samples were collected and analyzed for standard characteristics using light microscopy, and for sperm DNA fragmentation using both TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. Results: There were no significant differences in the values of the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) obtained when the analysis was performed using TUNEL or flow cytometry (p = 0.543). Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between sperm motility (%) and sperm DNA fragmentation (p < 0.01), as well as between sperm concentration and sperm DNA fragmentation (p < 0.05). The Mann–Whitney U test showed no significant difference in the DFI among couples with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and miscarriages (p = 0.352). Conclusions: Both methods (TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry) have a high efficiency and sensitivity in accurately detecting sperm DNA fragmentation, and can be effectively used to assess male fertility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10384605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103846052023-07-30 Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry Chatzimeletiou, Katerina Fleva, Alexandra Nikolopoulos, Theodoros-Thomas Markopoulou, Maria Zervakakou, Glykeria Papanikolaou, Kyriakos Anifandis, George Gianakou, Anastasia Grimbizis, Grigoris Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Sperm DNA fragmentation refers to any break in one or both of the strands of DNA in the head of a sperm. The most widely used methodologies for assessing sperm DNA fragmentation are the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), the sperm chromatin dispersion assay (SCD), the single-cell gel electrophoresis assay (SCGE–comet), and the terminal-deoxynucleotidyl-transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency and sensitivity of the analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. Materials and Methods: Semen samples were collected and analyzed for standard characteristics using light microscopy, and for sperm DNA fragmentation using both TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. Results: There were no significant differences in the values of the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) obtained when the analysis was performed using TUNEL or flow cytometry (p = 0.543). Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between sperm motility (%) and sperm DNA fragmentation (p < 0.01), as well as between sperm concentration and sperm DNA fragmentation (p < 0.05). The Mann–Whitney U test showed no significant difference in the DFI among couples with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and miscarriages (p = 0.352). Conclusions: Both methods (TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry) have a high efficiency and sensitivity in accurately detecting sperm DNA fragmentation, and can be effectively used to assess male fertility. MDPI 2023-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10384605/ /pubmed/37512124 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071313 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chatzimeletiou, Katerina
Fleva, Alexandra
Nikolopoulos, Theodoros-Thomas
Markopoulou, Maria
Zervakakou, Glykeria
Papanikolaou, Kyriakos
Anifandis, George
Gianakou, Anastasia
Grimbizis, Grigoris
Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry
title Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry
title_full Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry
title_fullStr Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry
title_short Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry
title_sort evaluation of sperm dna fragmentation using two different methods: tunel via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10384605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37512124
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071313
work_keys_str_mv AT chatzimeletioukaterina evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry
AT flevaalexandra evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry
AT nikolopoulostheodorosthomas evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry
AT markopouloumaria evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry
AT zervakakouglykeria evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry
AT papanikolaoukyriakos evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry
AT anifandisgeorge evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry
AT gianakouanastasia evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry
AT grimbizisgrigoris evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingtwodifferentmethodstunelviafluorescencemicroscopyandflowcytometry