Cargando…

The Effect of Additional Treatment with Empagliflozin or Semaglutide on Endothelial Function and Arterial Stiffness in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus—ENDIS Study

We investigated the effect of additional treatment with newer antidiabetic drugs on endothelium function and arterial stiffness in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) without cardiovascular diseases. A total of 89 participants, all users of CGMS (continuous monitoring glucose system), were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Navodnik, Maja Preložnik, Janež, Andrej, Žuran, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37514131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071945
Descripción
Sumario:We investigated the effect of additional treatment with newer antidiabetic drugs on endothelium function and arterial stiffness in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) without cardiovascular diseases. A total of 89 participants, all users of CGMS (continuous monitoring glucose system), were randomized into three comparable groups, receiving empagliflozin (E; n = 30), receiving semaglutide (S; n = 30), and a control group (C; n = 29). At baseline and 12 weeks post treatment, we measured FMD (brachial artery flow-mediated dilation) and FBF (forearm blood flow as reactive hyperemia assessed with strain gauge plethysmography) as parameters of endothelial function, as well as pulse wave velocity (PWV) and peripheral resistance as parameters of arterial stiffness. Improvement in FMD was significant in both intervention groups compared to controls (E group 2.0-fold, p = 0.000 and S group 1.9-fold, p = 0.000), with no changes between those two groups (p = 0.745). During the evaluation of FBF, there were statistically insignificant improvements in both therapeutic groups compared to controls (E group 1.39-fold, p = 0.074 and S group 1.22-fold, p = 0.701). In arterial stiffness parameters, improvements were seen only in the semaglutide group, with a decline in peripheral resistance by 5.1% (p = 0.046). We can conclude that, for arterial stiffness, semaglutide seems better, but both drugs positively impact endothelial function and, thus, could also have a protective role in T1DM.