Cargando…

A Dynamical Systems Approach to Characterizing Brain–Body Interactions during Movement: Challenges, Interpretations, and Recommendations

Brain–body interactions (BBIs) have been the focus of intense scrutiny since the inception of the scientific method, playing a foundational role in the earliest debates over the philosophy of science. Contemporary investigations of BBIs to elucidate the neural principles of motor control have benefi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monroe, Derek C., Berry, Nathaniel T., Fino, Peter C., Rhea, Christopher K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37514591
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146296
_version_ 1785081444449648640
author Monroe, Derek C.
Berry, Nathaniel T.
Fino, Peter C.
Rhea, Christopher K.
author_facet Monroe, Derek C.
Berry, Nathaniel T.
Fino, Peter C.
Rhea, Christopher K.
author_sort Monroe, Derek C.
collection PubMed
description Brain–body interactions (BBIs) have been the focus of intense scrutiny since the inception of the scientific method, playing a foundational role in the earliest debates over the philosophy of science. Contemporary investigations of BBIs to elucidate the neural principles of motor control have benefited from advances in neuroimaging, device engineering, and signal processing. However, these studies generally suffer from two major limitations. First, they rely on interpretations of ‘brain’ activity that are behavioral in nature, rather than neuroanatomical or biophysical. Second, they employ methodological approaches that are inconsistent with a dynamical systems approach to neuromotor control. These limitations represent a fundamental challenge to the use of BBIs for answering basic and applied research questions in neuroimaging and neurorehabilitation. Thus, this review is written as a tutorial to address both limitations for those interested in studying BBIs through a dynamical systems lens. First, we outline current best practices for acquiring, interpreting, and cleaning scalp-measured electroencephalography (EEG) acquired during whole-body movement. Second, we discuss historical and current theories for modeling EEG and kinematic data as dynamical systems. Third, we provide worked examples from both canonical model systems and from empirical EEG and kinematic data collected from two subjects during an overground walking task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10385586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103855862023-07-30 A Dynamical Systems Approach to Characterizing Brain–Body Interactions during Movement: Challenges, Interpretations, and Recommendations Monroe, Derek C. Berry, Nathaniel T. Fino, Peter C. Rhea, Christopher K. Sensors (Basel) Review Brain–body interactions (BBIs) have been the focus of intense scrutiny since the inception of the scientific method, playing a foundational role in the earliest debates over the philosophy of science. Contemporary investigations of BBIs to elucidate the neural principles of motor control have benefited from advances in neuroimaging, device engineering, and signal processing. However, these studies generally suffer from two major limitations. First, they rely on interpretations of ‘brain’ activity that are behavioral in nature, rather than neuroanatomical or biophysical. Second, they employ methodological approaches that are inconsistent with a dynamical systems approach to neuromotor control. These limitations represent a fundamental challenge to the use of BBIs for answering basic and applied research questions in neuroimaging and neurorehabilitation. Thus, this review is written as a tutorial to address both limitations for those interested in studying BBIs through a dynamical systems lens. First, we outline current best practices for acquiring, interpreting, and cleaning scalp-measured electroencephalography (EEG) acquired during whole-body movement. Second, we discuss historical and current theories for modeling EEG and kinematic data as dynamical systems. Third, we provide worked examples from both canonical model systems and from empirical EEG and kinematic data collected from two subjects during an overground walking task. MDPI 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10385586/ /pubmed/37514591 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146296 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Monroe, Derek C.
Berry, Nathaniel T.
Fino, Peter C.
Rhea, Christopher K.
A Dynamical Systems Approach to Characterizing Brain–Body Interactions during Movement: Challenges, Interpretations, and Recommendations
title A Dynamical Systems Approach to Characterizing Brain–Body Interactions during Movement: Challenges, Interpretations, and Recommendations
title_full A Dynamical Systems Approach to Characterizing Brain–Body Interactions during Movement: Challenges, Interpretations, and Recommendations
title_fullStr A Dynamical Systems Approach to Characterizing Brain–Body Interactions during Movement: Challenges, Interpretations, and Recommendations
title_full_unstemmed A Dynamical Systems Approach to Characterizing Brain–Body Interactions during Movement: Challenges, Interpretations, and Recommendations
title_short A Dynamical Systems Approach to Characterizing Brain–Body Interactions during Movement: Challenges, Interpretations, and Recommendations
title_sort dynamical systems approach to characterizing brain–body interactions during movement: challenges, interpretations, and recommendations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37514591
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146296
work_keys_str_mv AT monroederekc adynamicalsystemsapproachtocharacterizingbrainbodyinteractionsduringmovementchallengesinterpretationsandrecommendations
AT berrynathanielt adynamicalsystemsapproachtocharacterizingbrainbodyinteractionsduringmovementchallengesinterpretationsandrecommendations
AT finopeterc adynamicalsystemsapproachtocharacterizingbrainbodyinteractionsduringmovementchallengesinterpretationsandrecommendations
AT rheachristopherk adynamicalsystemsapproachtocharacterizingbrainbodyinteractionsduringmovementchallengesinterpretationsandrecommendations
AT monroederekc dynamicalsystemsapproachtocharacterizingbrainbodyinteractionsduringmovementchallengesinterpretationsandrecommendations
AT berrynathanielt dynamicalsystemsapproachtocharacterizingbrainbodyinteractionsduringmovementchallengesinterpretationsandrecommendations
AT finopeterc dynamicalsystemsapproachtocharacterizingbrainbodyinteractionsduringmovementchallengesinterpretationsandrecommendations
AT rheachristopherk dynamicalsystemsapproachtocharacterizingbrainbodyinteractionsduringmovementchallengesinterpretationsandrecommendations