Cargando…

Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review

Background: Approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, dalbavancin (DBV) has gradually acquired over the years a role as an off-label treatment for several infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria even in other anatomical sites. Osteoarticular (OA) infections are one of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lovatti, Sofia, Tiecco, Giorgio, Mulé, Alice, Rossi, Luca, Sforza, Anita, Salvi, Martina, Signorini, Liana, Castelli, Francesco, Quiros-Roldan, Eugenia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37513919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16071005
_version_ 1785081470078943232
author Lovatti, Sofia
Tiecco, Giorgio
Mulé, Alice
Rossi, Luca
Sforza, Anita
Salvi, Martina
Signorini, Liana
Castelli, Francesco
Quiros-Roldan, Eugenia
author_facet Lovatti, Sofia
Tiecco, Giorgio
Mulé, Alice
Rossi, Luca
Sforza, Anita
Salvi, Martina
Signorini, Liana
Castelli, Francesco
Quiros-Roldan, Eugenia
author_sort Lovatti, Sofia
collection PubMed
description Background: Approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, dalbavancin (DBV) has gradually acquired over the years a role as an off-label treatment for several infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria even in other anatomical sites. Osteoarticular (OA) infections are one of the most difficult-to-treat infections and, since the absence of recommendations, clinicians use different and heterogenic DBV dosing schedule regimens for the off-label treatment of osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, and septic arthritis. Our aim is to systematically review the current literature to describe DBV administration schedules and their outcome in OA infections. Methods: According to the 2020 updated PRISMA guidelines, all peer-reviewed articles regarding the use of DBV in OA infections were included. We conducted a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Trials. Results: A total of 23 studies and 450 patients were included, prevalently male (144/195, 73.8%) and diabetic (53/163, 32.5%). Overall, 280 (280/388, 72.2%) osteomyelitis, 79 (79/388, 20.4%) spondylodiscitis, and 29 (29/388, 7.5%) septic arthritis were considered. Staphylococcus aureus (164/243, 67.5%) was the most common pathogen isolated. A previous treatment failure (45/96, 46.9%) was the main reason for a switch to a long-acting antibiotic. Most patients were successfully cured with DBV (318/401, 79.3%). A source control was performed in most patients with a favourable outcome (80.4%), while MRSA was prevalently isolated in people with an unfavourable outcome (57%). While a higher percentage of success was found in people who received three doses of DBV 1 week apart (92.3%), a higher rate of treatment failure was recorded in cases of when the DBV cycle was composed of less than two or more than four doses (27.8%). Conclusions: DBV has shown to be effective as a treatment for OA infections. The most favourable outcome was found in patients receiving three doses of DBV and with an adequate surgical management prior to antibiotic treatment. Although a rigorous administration schedule does not exist, DBV is a viable treatment option in the management of OA infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10385685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103856852023-07-30 Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review Lovatti, Sofia Tiecco, Giorgio Mulé, Alice Rossi, Luca Sforza, Anita Salvi, Martina Signorini, Liana Castelli, Francesco Quiros-Roldan, Eugenia Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Systematic Review Background: Approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, dalbavancin (DBV) has gradually acquired over the years a role as an off-label treatment for several infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria even in other anatomical sites. Osteoarticular (OA) infections are one of the most difficult-to-treat infections and, since the absence of recommendations, clinicians use different and heterogenic DBV dosing schedule regimens for the off-label treatment of osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, and septic arthritis. Our aim is to systematically review the current literature to describe DBV administration schedules and their outcome in OA infections. Methods: According to the 2020 updated PRISMA guidelines, all peer-reviewed articles regarding the use of DBV in OA infections were included. We conducted a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Trials. Results: A total of 23 studies and 450 patients were included, prevalently male (144/195, 73.8%) and diabetic (53/163, 32.5%). Overall, 280 (280/388, 72.2%) osteomyelitis, 79 (79/388, 20.4%) spondylodiscitis, and 29 (29/388, 7.5%) septic arthritis were considered. Staphylococcus aureus (164/243, 67.5%) was the most common pathogen isolated. A previous treatment failure (45/96, 46.9%) was the main reason for a switch to a long-acting antibiotic. Most patients were successfully cured with DBV (318/401, 79.3%). A source control was performed in most patients with a favourable outcome (80.4%), while MRSA was prevalently isolated in people with an unfavourable outcome (57%). While a higher percentage of success was found in people who received three doses of DBV 1 week apart (92.3%), a higher rate of treatment failure was recorded in cases of when the DBV cycle was composed of less than two or more than four doses (27.8%). Conclusions: DBV has shown to be effective as a treatment for OA infections. The most favourable outcome was found in patients receiving three doses of DBV and with an adequate surgical management prior to antibiotic treatment. Although a rigorous administration schedule does not exist, DBV is a viable treatment option in the management of OA infections. MDPI 2023-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10385685/ /pubmed/37513919 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16071005 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Lovatti, Sofia
Tiecco, Giorgio
Mulé, Alice
Rossi, Luca
Sforza, Anita
Salvi, Martina
Signorini, Liana
Castelli, Francesco
Quiros-Roldan, Eugenia
Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review
title Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review
title_full Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review
title_short Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review
title_sort dalbavancin in bone and joint infections: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37513919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16071005
work_keys_str_mv AT lovattisofia dalbavancininboneandjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT tieccogiorgio dalbavancininboneandjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT mulealice dalbavancininboneandjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT rossiluca dalbavancininboneandjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT sforzaanita dalbavancininboneandjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT salvimartina dalbavancininboneandjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT signoriniliana dalbavancininboneandjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT castellifrancesco dalbavancininboneandjointinfectionsasystematicreview
AT quirosroldaneugenia dalbavancininboneandjointinfectionsasystematicreview