Cargando…

A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor

Purpose: To compare surgical and functional outcomes, safety, efficacy and cost of silicone plate vs. autogenous auricular cartilage (AAC) as alternate material to tarsal plate for upper eyelid reconstruction after excision of malignant tumor. Methods: A prospective, comparative, interventional stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandal, Salil Kumar, Maitra, Anwesha, Sarkar, Oishik, Roy, Paulomi, Gayen, Mousree, Paul, Anamika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Romanian Society of Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37522016
http://dx.doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2023.27
_version_ 1785081475891200000
author Mandal, Salil Kumar
Maitra, Anwesha
Sarkar, Oishik
Roy, Paulomi
Gayen, Mousree
Paul, Anamika
author_facet Mandal, Salil Kumar
Maitra, Anwesha
Sarkar, Oishik
Roy, Paulomi
Gayen, Mousree
Paul, Anamika
author_sort Mandal, Salil Kumar
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To compare surgical and functional outcomes, safety, efficacy and cost of silicone plate vs. autogenous auricular cartilage (AAC) as alternate material to tarsal plate for upper eyelid reconstruction after excision of malignant tumor. Methods: A prospective, comparative, interventional study of over 3 years was conducted on two groups of twenty patients each. All the patients had undergone the Modified Cutler Beard procedure with AAC being used as tarsal substitute in one group and a novel silicone plate in the other. Post-operative MRD 1, LPS action, Central Lid Thickness, and Lid contour were recorded at one week, one month and six months follow-up. Results: The pre-operative MRD 1 in the silicone plate and AAC group was -2.95 ± 1.19 mm and -3.05 ± 1(1).05 mm, post-operative in the silicone plate group 3.8 ± 0.4 mm, and in the AAC group, 3.8 ± 0.41 mm. The pre-operative LPS action in the silicone plate and AAC group was 1.2 ± 1.1 mm and 1.0 ± 0.9 mm and post-operative it was 13.8 ± 0.4 mm for the silicone plate group and 13.7 ± 0.4 mm for the AAC group. The post-operative lid thickness for the silicone plate group was 4.4 ± 0.17 mm and for the AAC group it was 4.4 ± 0.08 mm. Conclusion: The cosmetic outcome in terms of lid contour maintenance is better in the silicone plate group, in which it markedly reduces the surgical time, provides earlier rehabilitation, and eliminates disease transmission. Harvesting of AAC is a skillful and time-consuming procedure and adds to the post-operative morbidity due to the presence of a second surgical site. The low manufacturing cost of silicone plate as opposed to other allogenic and synthetic tarsal substitutes makes it readily available to resource limited populations. The silicone plate is reckoned to become the material of choice as tarsal substitute in the future. Abbreviations: AAC = Autogenous auricular cartilage, MRD-1 = Margin reflex distance-1, LPS = levator palpebrae superioris, PFH = palpebral fissure height
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10385707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Romanian Society of Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103857072023-07-30 A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor Mandal, Salil Kumar Maitra, Anwesha Sarkar, Oishik Roy, Paulomi Gayen, Mousree Paul, Anamika Rom J Ophthalmol General Articles Purpose: To compare surgical and functional outcomes, safety, efficacy and cost of silicone plate vs. autogenous auricular cartilage (AAC) as alternate material to tarsal plate for upper eyelid reconstruction after excision of malignant tumor. Methods: A prospective, comparative, interventional study of over 3 years was conducted on two groups of twenty patients each. All the patients had undergone the Modified Cutler Beard procedure with AAC being used as tarsal substitute in one group and a novel silicone plate in the other. Post-operative MRD 1, LPS action, Central Lid Thickness, and Lid contour were recorded at one week, one month and six months follow-up. Results: The pre-operative MRD 1 in the silicone plate and AAC group was -2.95 ± 1.19 mm and -3.05 ± 1(1).05 mm, post-operative in the silicone plate group 3.8 ± 0.4 mm, and in the AAC group, 3.8 ± 0.41 mm. The pre-operative LPS action in the silicone plate and AAC group was 1.2 ± 1.1 mm and 1.0 ± 0.9 mm and post-operative it was 13.8 ± 0.4 mm for the silicone plate group and 13.7 ± 0.4 mm for the AAC group. The post-operative lid thickness for the silicone plate group was 4.4 ± 0.17 mm and for the AAC group it was 4.4 ± 0.08 mm. Conclusion: The cosmetic outcome in terms of lid contour maintenance is better in the silicone plate group, in which it markedly reduces the surgical time, provides earlier rehabilitation, and eliminates disease transmission. Harvesting of AAC is a skillful and time-consuming procedure and adds to the post-operative morbidity due to the presence of a second surgical site. The low manufacturing cost of silicone plate as opposed to other allogenic and synthetic tarsal substitutes makes it readily available to resource limited populations. The silicone plate is reckoned to become the material of choice as tarsal substitute in the future. Abbreviations: AAC = Autogenous auricular cartilage, MRD-1 = Margin reflex distance-1, LPS = levator palpebrae superioris, PFH = palpebral fissure height Romanian Society of Ophthalmology 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10385707/ /pubmed/37522016 http://dx.doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2023.27 Text en #x00A9; The Authors.Romanian Society of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle General Articles
Mandal, Salil Kumar
Maitra, Anwesha
Sarkar, Oishik
Roy, Paulomi
Gayen, Mousree
Paul, Anamika
A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor
title A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor
title_full A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor
title_fullStr A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor
title_short A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor
title_sort comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor
topic General Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37522016
http://dx.doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2023.27
work_keys_str_mv AT mandalsalilkumar acomparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor
AT maitraanwesha acomparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor
AT sarkaroishik acomparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor
AT roypaulomi acomparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor
AT gayenmousree acomparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor
AT paulanamika acomparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor
AT mandalsalilkumar comparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor
AT maitraanwesha comparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor
AT sarkaroishik comparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor
AT roypaulomi comparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor
AT gayenmousree comparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor
AT paulanamika comparisonofnovelsiliconeplatevsauricularcartilageinuppereyelidreconstructionfollowingexcisionofmalignanttumor