Cargando…
Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients
Background: In this retrospective study, we report the effectiveness and safety of a dedicated extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO(2)R) device in critically ill patients. Methods: Adult patients on mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or decompensated chro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505051 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13070686 |
_version_ | 1785081539282862080 |
---|---|
author | Taccone, Fabio Silvio Rinaldi, Simone Annoni, Filippo Nobile, Leda Di Nardo, Matteo Maccieri, Jessica Aliberti, Anna Malfertheiner, Maximilan Valentin Marudi, Andrea Broman, Lars Mikael Belliato, Mirko |
author_facet | Taccone, Fabio Silvio Rinaldi, Simone Annoni, Filippo Nobile, Leda Di Nardo, Matteo Maccieri, Jessica Aliberti, Anna Malfertheiner, Maximilan Valentin Marudi, Andrea Broman, Lars Mikael Belliato, Mirko |
author_sort | Taccone, Fabio Silvio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In this retrospective study, we report the effectiveness and safety of a dedicated extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO(2)R) device in critically ill patients. Methods: Adult patients on mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (dCOPD), who were treated with a dedicated ECCO(2)R device (CO2RESET, Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) in case of hypercapnic acidemia, were included. Repeated measurements of CO(2) removal (VCO(2)) at baseline and 1, 12, and 24 h after the initiation of therapy were recorded. Results: Over a three-year period, 11 patients received ECCO(2)R (median age 60 [43–72] years) 3 (2–39) days after ICU admission; nine patients had ARDS and two had dCOPD. Median baseline pH and PaCO(2) levels were 7.27 (7.12–7.33) and 65 (50–84) mmHg, respectively. With a median ECCO(2)R blood flow of 800 (500–800) mL/min and maximum gas flow of 6 (2–14) L/min, the VCO(2) at 12 h after ECCO(2)R initiation was 157 (58–183) mL/min. Tidal volume, respiratory rate, and driving pressure were significantly reduced over time. Few side effects were reported. Conclusions: In this study, a dedicated ECCO(2)R device provided a high VCO(2) with a favorable risk profile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10385949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103859492023-07-30 Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients Taccone, Fabio Silvio Rinaldi, Simone Annoni, Filippo Nobile, Leda Di Nardo, Matteo Maccieri, Jessica Aliberti, Anna Malfertheiner, Maximilan Valentin Marudi, Andrea Broman, Lars Mikael Belliato, Mirko Membranes (Basel) Article Background: In this retrospective study, we report the effectiveness and safety of a dedicated extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO(2)R) device in critically ill patients. Methods: Adult patients on mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (dCOPD), who were treated with a dedicated ECCO(2)R device (CO2RESET, Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) in case of hypercapnic acidemia, were included. Repeated measurements of CO(2) removal (VCO(2)) at baseline and 1, 12, and 24 h after the initiation of therapy were recorded. Results: Over a three-year period, 11 patients received ECCO(2)R (median age 60 [43–72] years) 3 (2–39) days after ICU admission; nine patients had ARDS and two had dCOPD. Median baseline pH and PaCO(2) levels were 7.27 (7.12–7.33) and 65 (50–84) mmHg, respectively. With a median ECCO(2)R blood flow of 800 (500–800) mL/min and maximum gas flow of 6 (2–14) L/min, the VCO(2) at 12 h after ECCO(2)R initiation was 157 (58–183) mL/min. Tidal volume, respiratory rate, and driving pressure were significantly reduced over time. Few side effects were reported. Conclusions: In this study, a dedicated ECCO(2)R device provided a high VCO(2) with a favorable risk profile. MDPI 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10385949/ /pubmed/37505051 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13070686 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Taccone, Fabio Silvio Rinaldi, Simone Annoni, Filippo Nobile, Leda Di Nardo, Matteo Maccieri, Jessica Aliberti, Anna Malfertheiner, Maximilan Valentin Marudi, Andrea Broman, Lars Mikael Belliato, Mirko Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients |
title | Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients |
title_full | Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients |
title_fullStr | Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients |
title_short | Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients |
title_sort | safety and effectiveness of carbon dioxide removal co2reset device in critically ill patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505051 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13070686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tacconefabiosilvio safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients AT rinaldisimone safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients AT annonifilippo safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients AT nobileleda safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients AT dinardomatteo safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients AT maccierijessica safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients AT alibertianna safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients AT malfertheinermaximilanvalentin safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients AT marudiandrea safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients AT bromanlarsmikael safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients AT belliatomirko safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients |