Cargando…

Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients

Background: In this retrospective study, we report the effectiveness and safety of a dedicated extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO(2)R) device in critically ill patients. Methods: Adult patients on mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or decompensated chro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taccone, Fabio Silvio, Rinaldi, Simone, Annoni, Filippo, Nobile, Leda, Di Nardo, Matteo, Maccieri, Jessica, Aliberti, Anna, Malfertheiner, Maximilan Valentin, Marudi, Andrea, Broman, Lars Mikael, Belliato, Mirko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505051
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13070686
_version_ 1785081539282862080
author Taccone, Fabio Silvio
Rinaldi, Simone
Annoni, Filippo
Nobile, Leda
Di Nardo, Matteo
Maccieri, Jessica
Aliberti, Anna
Malfertheiner, Maximilan Valentin
Marudi, Andrea
Broman, Lars Mikael
Belliato, Mirko
author_facet Taccone, Fabio Silvio
Rinaldi, Simone
Annoni, Filippo
Nobile, Leda
Di Nardo, Matteo
Maccieri, Jessica
Aliberti, Anna
Malfertheiner, Maximilan Valentin
Marudi, Andrea
Broman, Lars Mikael
Belliato, Mirko
author_sort Taccone, Fabio Silvio
collection PubMed
description Background: In this retrospective study, we report the effectiveness and safety of a dedicated extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO(2)R) device in critically ill patients. Methods: Adult patients on mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (dCOPD), who were treated with a dedicated ECCO(2)R device (CO2RESET, Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) in case of hypercapnic acidemia, were included. Repeated measurements of CO(2) removal (VCO(2)) at baseline and 1, 12, and 24 h after the initiation of therapy were recorded. Results: Over a three-year period, 11 patients received ECCO(2)R (median age 60 [43–72] years) 3 (2–39) days after ICU admission; nine patients had ARDS and two had dCOPD. Median baseline pH and PaCO(2) levels were 7.27 (7.12–7.33) and 65 (50–84) mmHg, respectively. With a median ECCO(2)R blood flow of 800 (500–800) mL/min and maximum gas flow of 6 (2–14) L/min, the VCO(2) at 12 h after ECCO(2)R initiation was 157 (58–183) mL/min. Tidal volume, respiratory rate, and driving pressure were significantly reduced over time. Few side effects were reported. Conclusions: In this study, a dedicated ECCO(2)R device provided a high VCO(2) with a favorable risk profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10385949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103859492023-07-30 Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients Taccone, Fabio Silvio Rinaldi, Simone Annoni, Filippo Nobile, Leda Di Nardo, Matteo Maccieri, Jessica Aliberti, Anna Malfertheiner, Maximilan Valentin Marudi, Andrea Broman, Lars Mikael Belliato, Mirko Membranes (Basel) Article Background: In this retrospective study, we report the effectiveness and safety of a dedicated extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO(2)R) device in critically ill patients. Methods: Adult patients on mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (dCOPD), who were treated with a dedicated ECCO(2)R device (CO2RESET, Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) in case of hypercapnic acidemia, were included. Repeated measurements of CO(2) removal (VCO(2)) at baseline and 1, 12, and 24 h after the initiation of therapy were recorded. Results: Over a three-year period, 11 patients received ECCO(2)R (median age 60 [43–72] years) 3 (2–39) days after ICU admission; nine patients had ARDS and two had dCOPD. Median baseline pH and PaCO(2) levels were 7.27 (7.12–7.33) and 65 (50–84) mmHg, respectively. With a median ECCO(2)R blood flow of 800 (500–800) mL/min and maximum gas flow of 6 (2–14) L/min, the VCO(2) at 12 h after ECCO(2)R initiation was 157 (58–183) mL/min. Tidal volume, respiratory rate, and driving pressure were significantly reduced over time. Few side effects were reported. Conclusions: In this study, a dedicated ECCO(2)R device provided a high VCO(2) with a favorable risk profile. MDPI 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10385949/ /pubmed/37505051 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13070686 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Taccone, Fabio Silvio
Rinaldi, Simone
Annoni, Filippo
Nobile, Leda
Di Nardo, Matteo
Maccieri, Jessica
Aliberti, Anna
Malfertheiner, Maximilan Valentin
Marudi, Andrea
Broman, Lars Mikael
Belliato, Mirko
Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients
title Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients
title_full Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients
title_fullStr Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients
title_short Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients
title_sort safety and effectiveness of carbon dioxide removal co2reset device in critically ill patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505051
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13070686
work_keys_str_mv AT tacconefabiosilvio safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients
AT rinaldisimone safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients
AT annonifilippo safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients
AT nobileleda safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients
AT dinardomatteo safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients
AT maccierijessica safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients
AT alibertianna safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients
AT malfertheinermaximilanvalentin safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients
AT marudiandrea safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients
AT bromanlarsmikael safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients
AT belliatomirko safetyandeffectivenessofcarbondioxideremovalco2resetdeviceincriticallyillpatients