Cargando…
Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing
Industry 4 (I4) was a revolutionary new stage for technological progress in manufacturing which promised a new level of interconnectedness between a diverse range of technologies. Sensors, as a point technology, play an important role in these developments, facilitating human–machine interaction and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37514710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146416 |
_version_ | 1785081608725856256 |
---|---|
author | Briken, Kendra Moore, Jed Scholarios, Dora Rose, Emily Sherlock, Andrew |
author_facet | Briken, Kendra Moore, Jed Scholarios, Dora Rose, Emily Sherlock, Andrew |
author_sort | Briken, Kendra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Industry 4 (I4) was a revolutionary new stage for technological progress in manufacturing which promised a new level of interconnectedness between a diverse range of technologies. Sensors, as a point technology, play an important role in these developments, facilitating human–machine interaction and enabling data collection for system-level technologies. Concerns for human labour working in I4 environments (e.g., health and safety, data generation and extraction) are acknowledged by Industry 5 (I5), an update of I4 which promises greater attention to human–machine relations through a values-driven approach to collaboration and co-design. This article explores how engineering experts integrate values promoted by policy-makers into both their thinking about the human in their work and in their writing. This paper demonstrates a novel interdisciplinary approach in which an awareness of different disciplinary epistemic values associated with humans and work guides a systematic literature review and interpretive coding of practice-focussed engineering papers. Findings demonstrate evidence of an I5 human-centric approach: a high value for employees as “end-users” of innovative systems in manufacturing; and an increase in output addressing human activity in modelling and the technologies available to address this concern. However, epistemic publishing practices show that efforts to increase the effectiveness of manufacturing systems often neglect worker voice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10386219 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103862192023-07-30 Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing Briken, Kendra Moore, Jed Scholarios, Dora Rose, Emily Sherlock, Andrew Sensors (Basel) Review Industry 4 (I4) was a revolutionary new stage for technological progress in manufacturing which promised a new level of interconnectedness between a diverse range of technologies. Sensors, as a point technology, play an important role in these developments, facilitating human–machine interaction and enabling data collection for system-level technologies. Concerns for human labour working in I4 environments (e.g., health and safety, data generation and extraction) are acknowledged by Industry 5 (I5), an update of I4 which promises greater attention to human–machine relations through a values-driven approach to collaboration and co-design. This article explores how engineering experts integrate values promoted by policy-makers into both their thinking about the human in their work and in their writing. This paper demonstrates a novel interdisciplinary approach in which an awareness of different disciplinary epistemic values associated with humans and work guides a systematic literature review and interpretive coding of practice-focussed engineering papers. Findings demonstrate evidence of an I5 human-centric approach: a high value for employees as “end-users” of innovative systems in manufacturing; and an increase in output addressing human activity in modelling and the technologies available to address this concern. However, epistemic publishing practices show that efforts to increase the effectiveness of manufacturing systems often neglect worker voice. MDPI 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10386219/ /pubmed/37514710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146416 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Briken, Kendra Moore, Jed Scholarios, Dora Rose, Emily Sherlock, Andrew Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing |
title | Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing |
title_full | Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing |
title_fullStr | Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing |
title_full_unstemmed | Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing |
title_short | Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing |
title_sort | industry 5 and the human in human-centric manufacturing |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37514710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146416 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brikenkendra industry5andthehumaninhumancentricmanufacturing AT moorejed industry5andthehumaninhumancentricmanufacturing AT scholariosdora industry5andthehumaninhumancentricmanufacturing AT roseemily industry5andthehumaninhumancentricmanufacturing AT sherlockandrew industry5andthehumaninhumancentricmanufacturing |