Cargando…

Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing

Industry 4 (I4) was a revolutionary new stage for technological progress in manufacturing which promised a new level of interconnectedness between a diverse range of technologies. Sensors, as a point technology, play an important role in these developments, facilitating human–machine interaction and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briken, Kendra, Moore, Jed, Scholarios, Dora, Rose, Emily, Sherlock, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37514710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146416
_version_ 1785081608725856256
author Briken, Kendra
Moore, Jed
Scholarios, Dora
Rose, Emily
Sherlock, Andrew
author_facet Briken, Kendra
Moore, Jed
Scholarios, Dora
Rose, Emily
Sherlock, Andrew
author_sort Briken, Kendra
collection PubMed
description Industry 4 (I4) was a revolutionary new stage for technological progress in manufacturing which promised a new level of interconnectedness between a diverse range of technologies. Sensors, as a point technology, play an important role in these developments, facilitating human–machine interaction and enabling data collection for system-level technologies. Concerns for human labour working in I4 environments (e.g., health and safety, data generation and extraction) are acknowledged by Industry 5 (I5), an update of I4 which promises greater attention to human–machine relations through a values-driven approach to collaboration and co-design. This article explores how engineering experts integrate values promoted by policy-makers into both their thinking about the human in their work and in their writing. This paper demonstrates a novel interdisciplinary approach in which an awareness of different disciplinary epistemic values associated with humans and work guides a systematic literature review and interpretive coding of practice-focussed engineering papers. Findings demonstrate evidence of an I5 human-centric approach: a high value for employees as “end-users” of innovative systems in manufacturing; and an increase in output addressing human activity in modelling and the technologies available to address this concern. However, epistemic publishing practices show that efforts to increase the effectiveness of manufacturing systems often neglect worker voice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10386219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103862192023-07-30 Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing Briken, Kendra Moore, Jed Scholarios, Dora Rose, Emily Sherlock, Andrew Sensors (Basel) Review Industry 4 (I4) was a revolutionary new stage for technological progress in manufacturing which promised a new level of interconnectedness between a diverse range of technologies. Sensors, as a point technology, play an important role in these developments, facilitating human–machine interaction and enabling data collection for system-level technologies. Concerns for human labour working in I4 environments (e.g., health and safety, data generation and extraction) are acknowledged by Industry 5 (I5), an update of I4 which promises greater attention to human–machine relations through a values-driven approach to collaboration and co-design. This article explores how engineering experts integrate values promoted by policy-makers into both their thinking about the human in their work and in their writing. This paper demonstrates a novel interdisciplinary approach in which an awareness of different disciplinary epistemic values associated with humans and work guides a systematic literature review and interpretive coding of practice-focussed engineering papers. Findings demonstrate evidence of an I5 human-centric approach: a high value for employees as “end-users” of innovative systems in manufacturing; and an increase in output addressing human activity in modelling and the technologies available to address this concern. However, epistemic publishing practices show that efforts to increase the effectiveness of manufacturing systems often neglect worker voice. MDPI 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10386219/ /pubmed/37514710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146416 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Briken, Kendra
Moore, Jed
Scholarios, Dora
Rose, Emily
Sherlock, Andrew
Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing
title Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing
title_full Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing
title_fullStr Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing
title_full_unstemmed Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing
title_short Industry 5 and the Human in Human-Centric Manufacturing
title_sort industry 5 and the human in human-centric manufacturing
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37514710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23146416
work_keys_str_mv AT brikenkendra industry5andthehumaninhumancentricmanufacturing
AT moorejed industry5andthehumaninhumancentricmanufacturing
AT scholariosdora industry5andthehumaninhumancentricmanufacturing
AT roseemily industry5andthehumaninhumancentricmanufacturing
AT sherlockandrew industry5andthehumaninhumancentricmanufacturing