Cargando…

Tolvaptan for water retention in heart failure: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to collect, appraise, and synthesize existing evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on the effectiveness of tolvaptan for water retention in heart failure. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Yujing, Li, Haoyang, Gao, Jin, Mi, Zishuo, Chen, Hao, Li, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37516894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02293-3
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to collect, appraise, and synthesize existing evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on the effectiveness of tolvaptan for water retention in heart failure. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, web of science, Cochrane reviews for SRs/Mas published between the databases’ establishment to November 17, 2021. All the records were managed with Endnote 20. Standardized forms were used to extract data. Revman 5.3 was used to make forest plots to show the characteristics of outcomes. The methodological and evidence quality were respectively evaluated by AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2) and GRADE (Grading of Recommendation of Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. RESULTS: A total of 9 SRs/Mas between 2015 to 2020 met inclusion criteria. Serum sodium concentration and urine output were considered as primary outcomes and body weight change and all-cause mortality as second outcomes. Through conducting forest plots, it appeared that tolvaptan brought more positive effect than conventional therapies. It was pessimistic when it comes to the quality of the 9 studies. all the 9 articles were rated as low-quality because AMSTAR 2 evaluation showed that they each had at least one critical item (items 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15) defect. Besides, every article had a few non-critical item defects too. The result of GRADE assessment was not optimistic, so the overall quality of the evidences was low as well. CONCLUSION: Tolvaptan can be recommended for water retention in HF patients, but more evidence is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02293-3.