Cargando…

Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In minor hand surgery, tourniquet is typically inflated to 250 mmHg. The pressure may be too high and cause unnecessary adverse effects. Limb occlusion pressure plus safety margin or recommended tourniquet pressure (RTP), has been reported as optimal pressure to provide bloodless field i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat, Pukrittayakamee, Natsuda Chua, Woratanarat, Patarawan, Tawonsawatruk, Tulyapruek, Angsanuntsukh, Chanika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04000-3
_version_ 1785081708253544448
author Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat
Pukrittayakamee, Natsuda Chua
Woratanarat, Patarawan
Tawonsawatruk, Tulyapruek
Angsanuntsukh, Chanika
author_facet Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat
Pukrittayakamee, Natsuda Chua
Woratanarat, Patarawan
Tawonsawatruk, Tulyapruek
Angsanuntsukh, Chanika
author_sort Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In minor hand surgery, tourniquet is typically inflated to 250 mmHg. The pressure may be too high and cause unnecessary adverse effects. Limb occlusion pressure plus safety margin or recommended tourniquet pressure (RTP), has been reported as optimal pressure to provide bloodless field in limb surgeries. This study aimed to compare the RTP with the standard tourniquet pressure of 250 mmHg in minor hand surgery. METHODS: A double-blinded randomized control trial was conducted from July to December 2019 and June 2020 to May 2021. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: RTP and 250 mmHg with 3:1 ratio allocation. The outcomes were measurement of cuff pressure reduction, time to develop of tourniquet pain and discomfort, pain score, discomfort score, motionless and bloodless of operative field determined by the surgeon’s satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included, 84 were in RTP and 28 were in 250 mmHg group. Mean of tourniquet pressure was significantly lower in the RTP group (228.3 ± 17.2 mmHg) (P < 0.001). Even though, time to develop pain was not significantly different, the RTP group reported significantly less pain and discomfort, according to the pain score (P = 0.02) and discomfort score (P = 0.017). The RTP group provided better motionless field, while both groups equally created a bloodless field. CONCLUSION: The RTP significantly reduced tourniquet related pain and discomfort during minor hand surgeries. It provided better motionless operative field and adequate bloodless field. Therefore, the RTP should be considered as optimal tourniquet pressure for minor hand surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20210519001 (retrospectively registered). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10386602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103866022023-07-30 Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat Pukrittayakamee, Natsuda Chua Woratanarat, Patarawan Tawonsawatruk, Tulyapruek Angsanuntsukh, Chanika J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In minor hand surgery, tourniquet is typically inflated to 250 mmHg. The pressure may be too high and cause unnecessary adverse effects. Limb occlusion pressure plus safety margin or recommended tourniquet pressure (RTP), has been reported as optimal pressure to provide bloodless field in limb surgeries. This study aimed to compare the RTP with the standard tourniquet pressure of 250 mmHg in minor hand surgery. METHODS: A double-blinded randomized control trial was conducted from July to December 2019 and June 2020 to May 2021. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: RTP and 250 mmHg with 3:1 ratio allocation. The outcomes were measurement of cuff pressure reduction, time to develop of tourniquet pain and discomfort, pain score, discomfort score, motionless and bloodless of operative field determined by the surgeon’s satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included, 84 were in RTP and 28 were in 250 mmHg group. Mean of tourniquet pressure was significantly lower in the RTP group (228.3 ± 17.2 mmHg) (P < 0.001). Even though, time to develop pain was not significantly different, the RTP group reported significantly less pain and discomfort, according to the pain score (P = 0.02) and discomfort score (P = 0.017). The RTP group provided better motionless field, while both groups equally created a bloodless field. CONCLUSION: The RTP significantly reduced tourniquet related pain and discomfort during minor hand surgeries. It provided better motionless operative field and adequate bloodless field. Therefore, the RTP should be considered as optimal tourniquet pressure for minor hand surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20210519001 (retrospectively registered). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I. BioMed Central 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10386602/ /pubmed/37507745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04000-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat
Pukrittayakamee, Natsuda Chua
Woratanarat, Patarawan
Tawonsawatruk, Tulyapruek
Angsanuntsukh, Chanika
Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04000-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kanchanathepsakthepparat limbocclusionpressureversusstandardtourniquetinflationpressureinminorhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pukrittayakameenatsudachua limbocclusionpressureversusstandardtourniquetinflationpressureinminorhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT woratanaratpatarawan limbocclusionpressureversusstandardtourniquetinflationpressureinminorhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tawonsawatruktulyapruek limbocclusionpressureversusstandardtourniquetinflationpressureinminorhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT angsanuntsukhchanika limbocclusionpressureversusstandardtourniquetinflationpressureinminorhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial