Cargando…
Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: In minor hand surgery, tourniquet is typically inflated to 250 mmHg. The pressure may be too high and cause unnecessary adverse effects. Limb occlusion pressure plus safety margin or recommended tourniquet pressure (RTP), has been reported as optimal pressure to provide bloodless field i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04000-3 |
_version_ | 1785081708253544448 |
---|---|
author | Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat Pukrittayakamee, Natsuda Chua Woratanarat, Patarawan Tawonsawatruk, Tulyapruek Angsanuntsukh, Chanika |
author_facet | Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat Pukrittayakamee, Natsuda Chua Woratanarat, Patarawan Tawonsawatruk, Tulyapruek Angsanuntsukh, Chanika |
author_sort | Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In minor hand surgery, tourniquet is typically inflated to 250 mmHg. The pressure may be too high and cause unnecessary adverse effects. Limb occlusion pressure plus safety margin or recommended tourniquet pressure (RTP), has been reported as optimal pressure to provide bloodless field in limb surgeries. This study aimed to compare the RTP with the standard tourniquet pressure of 250 mmHg in minor hand surgery. METHODS: A double-blinded randomized control trial was conducted from July to December 2019 and June 2020 to May 2021. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: RTP and 250 mmHg with 3:1 ratio allocation. The outcomes were measurement of cuff pressure reduction, time to develop of tourniquet pain and discomfort, pain score, discomfort score, motionless and bloodless of operative field determined by the surgeon’s satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included, 84 were in RTP and 28 were in 250 mmHg group. Mean of tourniquet pressure was significantly lower in the RTP group (228.3 ± 17.2 mmHg) (P < 0.001). Even though, time to develop pain was not significantly different, the RTP group reported significantly less pain and discomfort, according to the pain score (P = 0.02) and discomfort score (P = 0.017). The RTP group provided better motionless field, while both groups equally created a bloodless field. CONCLUSION: The RTP significantly reduced tourniquet related pain and discomfort during minor hand surgeries. It provided better motionless operative field and adequate bloodless field. Therefore, the RTP should be considered as optimal tourniquet pressure for minor hand surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20210519001 (retrospectively registered). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10386602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103866022023-07-30 Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat Pukrittayakamee, Natsuda Chua Woratanarat, Patarawan Tawonsawatruk, Tulyapruek Angsanuntsukh, Chanika J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In minor hand surgery, tourniquet is typically inflated to 250 mmHg. The pressure may be too high and cause unnecessary adverse effects. Limb occlusion pressure plus safety margin or recommended tourniquet pressure (RTP), has been reported as optimal pressure to provide bloodless field in limb surgeries. This study aimed to compare the RTP with the standard tourniquet pressure of 250 mmHg in minor hand surgery. METHODS: A double-blinded randomized control trial was conducted from July to December 2019 and June 2020 to May 2021. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: RTP and 250 mmHg with 3:1 ratio allocation. The outcomes were measurement of cuff pressure reduction, time to develop of tourniquet pain and discomfort, pain score, discomfort score, motionless and bloodless of operative field determined by the surgeon’s satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included, 84 were in RTP and 28 were in 250 mmHg group. Mean of tourniquet pressure was significantly lower in the RTP group (228.3 ± 17.2 mmHg) (P < 0.001). Even though, time to develop pain was not significantly different, the RTP group reported significantly less pain and discomfort, according to the pain score (P = 0.02) and discomfort score (P = 0.017). The RTP group provided better motionless field, while both groups equally created a bloodless field. CONCLUSION: The RTP significantly reduced tourniquet related pain and discomfort during minor hand surgeries. It provided better motionless operative field and adequate bloodless field. Therefore, the RTP should be considered as optimal tourniquet pressure for minor hand surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20210519001 (retrospectively registered). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I. BioMed Central 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10386602/ /pubmed/37507745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04000-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kanchanathepsak, Thepparat Pukrittayakamee, Natsuda Chua Woratanarat, Patarawan Tawonsawatruk, Tulyapruek Angsanuntsukh, Chanika Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | limb occlusion pressure versus standard tourniquet inflation pressure in minor hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04000-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanchanathepsakthepparat limbocclusionpressureversusstandardtourniquetinflationpressureinminorhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pukrittayakameenatsudachua limbocclusionpressureversusstandardtourniquetinflationpressureinminorhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT woratanaratpatarawan limbocclusionpressureversusstandardtourniquetinflationpressureinminorhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tawonsawatruktulyapruek limbocclusionpressureversusstandardtourniquetinflationpressureinminorhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT angsanuntsukhchanika limbocclusionpressureversusstandardtourniquetinflationpressureinminorhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial |