Cargando…

Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations

BACKGROUND: The use of long-term life-sustaining technology for children improves survival rates in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), but it may also increase long-term morbidity. One example of this is children who are dependent on invasive long-term ventilation. Clinicians caring for these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexander, Denise, Quirke, Mary, Doyle, Carmel, Hill, Katie, Masterson, Kate, Brenner, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00937-6
_version_ 1785081722493206528
author Alexander, Denise
Quirke, Mary
Doyle, Carmel
Hill, Katie
Masterson, Kate
Brenner, Maria
author_facet Alexander, Denise
Quirke, Mary
Doyle, Carmel
Hill, Katie
Masterson, Kate
Brenner, Maria
author_sort Alexander, Denise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of long-term life-sustaining technology for children improves survival rates in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), but it may also increase long-term morbidity. One example of this is children who are dependent on invasive long-term ventilation. Clinicians caring for these children navigate an increasing array of ethical complexities. This study looks at the meaning clinicians give to the bioethical considerations associated with the availability of increasingly sophisticated technology. METHODS: A hermeneutic phenomenological exploration of the experiences of clinicians in deciding whether to initiate invasive long-term ventilation in children took place, via unstructured interviews. Data were analysed to gain insight into the lived experiences of clinicians. Participants were from PICUs, or closely allied to the care of children in PICUs, in four countries. RESULTS: Three themes developed from the data that portray the experiences of the clinicians: forming and managing relationships with parents and other clinicians considering, or using, life sustaining technology; the responsibility for moral and professional integrity in the use of technology; and keeping up with technological developments, and the resulting ethical and moral considerations. DISCUSSION: There are many benefits of the availability of long-term life-sustaining technology for a child, however, clinicians must also consider increasingly complex ethical dilemmas. Bioethical norms are adapting to aid clinicians, but challenges remain. CONCLUSION: During a time of technological solutionism, more needs to be understood about the influences on the initiation of invasive long-term ventilation for a child. Further research to better understand how clinicians, and bioethics services, support care delivery may positively impact this arena of health care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-023-00937-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10386660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103866602023-07-30 Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations Alexander, Denise Quirke, Mary Doyle, Carmel Hill, Katie Masterson, Kate Brenner, Maria BMC Med Ethics Research BACKGROUND: The use of long-term life-sustaining technology for children improves survival rates in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), but it may also increase long-term morbidity. One example of this is children who are dependent on invasive long-term ventilation. Clinicians caring for these children navigate an increasing array of ethical complexities. This study looks at the meaning clinicians give to the bioethical considerations associated with the availability of increasingly sophisticated technology. METHODS: A hermeneutic phenomenological exploration of the experiences of clinicians in deciding whether to initiate invasive long-term ventilation in children took place, via unstructured interviews. Data were analysed to gain insight into the lived experiences of clinicians. Participants were from PICUs, or closely allied to the care of children in PICUs, in four countries. RESULTS: Three themes developed from the data that portray the experiences of the clinicians: forming and managing relationships with parents and other clinicians considering, or using, life sustaining technology; the responsibility for moral and professional integrity in the use of technology; and keeping up with technological developments, and the resulting ethical and moral considerations. DISCUSSION: There are many benefits of the availability of long-term life-sustaining technology for a child, however, clinicians must also consider increasingly complex ethical dilemmas. Bioethical norms are adapting to aid clinicians, but challenges remain. CONCLUSION: During a time of technological solutionism, more needs to be understood about the influences on the initiation of invasive long-term ventilation for a child. Further research to better understand how clinicians, and bioethics services, support care delivery may positively impact this arena of health care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-023-00937-6. BioMed Central 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10386660/ /pubmed/37507700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00937-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Alexander, Denise
Quirke, Mary
Doyle, Carmel
Hill, Katie
Masterson, Kate
Brenner, Maria
Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
title Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
title_full Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
title_fullStr Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
title_full_unstemmed Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
title_short Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
title_sort technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00937-6
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderdenise technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations
AT quirkemary technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations
AT doylecarmel technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations
AT hillkatie technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations
AT mastersonkate technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations
AT brennermaria technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations