Cargando…
Clinical and imaging differences between Stanford Type B intramural hematoma-like lesions and classic aortic dissection
BACKGROUND: Intramural hematoma (IMH) and Aortic dissection (AD) have overlapping features. The aim of this study was to explore the differences between them by comparing the clinical manifestations and imaging features of patients with acute Stanford type B IMH-like lesions and acute Stanford type...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03413-6 |
_version_ | 1785081747989331968 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Chuanbin Li, Jinping Du, Enhui Miao, Yulu Li, Pinpin Guan, Wenhua |
author_facet | Wei, Chuanbin Li, Jinping Du, Enhui Miao, Yulu Li, Pinpin Guan, Wenhua |
author_sort | Wei, Chuanbin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intramural hematoma (IMH) and Aortic dissection (AD) have overlapping features. The aim of this study was to explore the differences between them by comparing the clinical manifestations and imaging features of patients with acute Stanford type B IMH-like lesions and acute Stanford type B AD (ATBAD). METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed the clinical and computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging data of 42 IMH-like lesions patients with ulcer-like projection (ULP) and 38 ATBAD patients, and compared their clinical and imaging features. RESULTS: (1) The IMH-like lesions patients were older than the ATBAD patients (64.2 ± 11.5 vs. 50.9 ± 12.2 years, P < 0.001). The D-dimer level in the IMH-like lesions group was significantly higher than that in the ATBAD group (11.2 ± 3.6 vs. 9.2 ± 4.5 mg/L, P < 0.05). The incidence rate of back pain was significantly higher in the ATBAD group than in the IMH-like lesions group (71.1% vs. 26.2%, P < 0.05). (2) The ULPs of IMH-like lesions and the intimal tears of ATBAD were concentrated in zone 4 of the descending thoracic aorta. The ULPs of IMH-like lesions and the intimal tears of ATBAD were mainly in the upper quadrant outside the lumen (64.3% vs. 65.8%, P > 0.05). (3) The maximum diameter of the ULPs in IMH-like lesions was smaller than that of the intimal tears in ATBAD (7.4 ± 3.4 vs. 10.8 ± 6.8 mm, P = 0.005). The lumen compression ratio in the ULPs plane and the maximum compression ratio of the aortic lumen in the IMH-like lesions group were smaller than that in the ADBAD group (P < 0.05). Fewer aortic segments were involved in IMH-like lesions patients than in ATBAD patients (5.6 ± 2.2 vs. 7.1 ± 1.9 segments, P < 0.005). The IMH-like lesions group had less branch involvement than that of the ATBAD group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The degree of intimal tears, lumen compression ratio, extent of lesion involvement, and impact on branch arteries in ATBAD are more severe than that of IMH-like lesions. But for the ULPs of IMH-like lesions and intimal tears of ATBAD, they have astonishing similarities in the location of the partition and the lumen quadrant, we have reason to believe that intimal tear is the initial factor in the pathogenesis of this kind of disease, and their clinical and imaging manifestations overlap, but the severity is different. Concerning similarities between these two conditions, these two may be a spectrum of one disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10386763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103867632023-07-30 Clinical and imaging differences between Stanford Type B intramural hematoma-like lesions and classic aortic dissection Wei, Chuanbin Li, Jinping Du, Enhui Miao, Yulu Li, Pinpin Guan, Wenhua BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research BACKGROUND: Intramural hematoma (IMH) and Aortic dissection (AD) have overlapping features. The aim of this study was to explore the differences between them by comparing the clinical manifestations and imaging features of patients with acute Stanford type B IMH-like lesions and acute Stanford type B AD (ATBAD). METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed the clinical and computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging data of 42 IMH-like lesions patients with ulcer-like projection (ULP) and 38 ATBAD patients, and compared their clinical and imaging features. RESULTS: (1) The IMH-like lesions patients were older than the ATBAD patients (64.2 ± 11.5 vs. 50.9 ± 12.2 years, P < 0.001). The D-dimer level in the IMH-like lesions group was significantly higher than that in the ATBAD group (11.2 ± 3.6 vs. 9.2 ± 4.5 mg/L, P < 0.05). The incidence rate of back pain was significantly higher in the ATBAD group than in the IMH-like lesions group (71.1% vs. 26.2%, P < 0.05). (2) The ULPs of IMH-like lesions and the intimal tears of ATBAD were concentrated in zone 4 of the descending thoracic aorta. The ULPs of IMH-like lesions and the intimal tears of ATBAD were mainly in the upper quadrant outside the lumen (64.3% vs. 65.8%, P > 0.05). (3) The maximum diameter of the ULPs in IMH-like lesions was smaller than that of the intimal tears in ATBAD (7.4 ± 3.4 vs. 10.8 ± 6.8 mm, P = 0.005). The lumen compression ratio in the ULPs plane and the maximum compression ratio of the aortic lumen in the IMH-like lesions group were smaller than that in the ADBAD group (P < 0.05). Fewer aortic segments were involved in IMH-like lesions patients than in ATBAD patients (5.6 ± 2.2 vs. 7.1 ± 1.9 segments, P < 0.005). The IMH-like lesions group had less branch involvement than that of the ATBAD group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The degree of intimal tears, lumen compression ratio, extent of lesion involvement, and impact on branch arteries in ATBAD are more severe than that of IMH-like lesions. But for the ULPs of IMH-like lesions and intimal tears of ATBAD, they have astonishing similarities in the location of the partition and the lumen quadrant, we have reason to believe that intimal tear is the initial factor in the pathogenesis of this kind of disease, and their clinical and imaging manifestations overlap, but the severity is different. Concerning similarities between these two conditions, these two may be a spectrum of one disease. BioMed Central 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10386763/ /pubmed/37507680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03413-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wei, Chuanbin Li, Jinping Du, Enhui Miao, Yulu Li, Pinpin Guan, Wenhua Clinical and imaging differences between Stanford Type B intramural hematoma-like lesions and classic aortic dissection |
title | Clinical and imaging differences between Stanford Type B intramural hematoma-like lesions and classic aortic dissection |
title_full | Clinical and imaging differences between Stanford Type B intramural hematoma-like lesions and classic aortic dissection |
title_fullStr | Clinical and imaging differences between Stanford Type B intramural hematoma-like lesions and classic aortic dissection |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and imaging differences between Stanford Type B intramural hematoma-like lesions and classic aortic dissection |
title_short | Clinical and imaging differences between Stanford Type B intramural hematoma-like lesions and classic aortic dissection |
title_sort | clinical and imaging differences between stanford type b intramural hematoma-like lesions and classic aortic dissection |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03413-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weichuanbin clinicalandimagingdifferencesbetweenstanfordtypebintramuralhematomalikelesionsandclassicaorticdissection AT lijinping clinicalandimagingdifferencesbetweenstanfordtypebintramuralhematomalikelesionsandclassicaorticdissection AT duenhui clinicalandimagingdifferencesbetweenstanfordtypebintramuralhematomalikelesionsandclassicaorticdissection AT miaoyulu clinicalandimagingdifferencesbetweenstanfordtypebintramuralhematomalikelesionsandclassicaorticdissection AT lipinpin clinicalandimagingdifferencesbetweenstanfordtypebintramuralhematomalikelesionsandclassicaorticdissection AT guanwenhua clinicalandimagingdifferencesbetweenstanfordtypebintramuralhematomalikelesionsandclassicaorticdissection |