Cargando…

Patient Satisfaction With General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Observational Study

Background Satisfaction in patients undergoing cesarean section (CS) is of great importance in every hospital. There are big differences between spinal and general anesthesia for CS in terms of outcome, recovery times, and quality of service. Methods This multicenter observational study included 144...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sobot Novakovic, Suzana, Cuk, Sanja, Svraka, Dragan, Milosevic, Dragan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521592
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42666
_version_ 1785081777082073088
author Sobot Novakovic, Suzana
Cuk, Sanja
Svraka, Dragan
Milosevic, Dragan
author_facet Sobot Novakovic, Suzana
Cuk, Sanja
Svraka, Dragan
Milosevic, Dragan
author_sort Sobot Novakovic, Suzana
collection PubMed
description Background Satisfaction in patients undergoing cesarean section (CS) is of great importance in every hospital. There are big differences between spinal and general anesthesia for CS in terms of outcome, recovery times, and quality of service. Methods This multicenter observational study included 1443 patients who had elective (n=622) or emergency (n=821) CS in five medical centers over the period of 16 months. Bauer questionnaire was used for measuring patient satisfaction after CS. The questionnaire contained 15 questions about anesthesia-related discomfort and satisfaction with anesthesia care. Results During the study period, 1161 (80%) patients underwent CS under general anesthesia (GA) and 282 of them (20%) received spinal anesthesia (SA) for CS. The most frequently reported anesthesia-related discomfort was pain at the surgical site (>70%), drowsiness (68%), and thirst (60%). The data on patient satisfaction showed high satisfaction that exceeded 90%. Anesthesia side effects were less frequent and the general satisfaction rate was higher in the SA group compared to the GA group (P < .001). Conclusion SA for CS had less frequent side effects and a better satisfaction rate compared to GA for CS. Hospitals need to make room for improvement of postoperative acute pain control and introduction to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for elective CS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10386895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103868952023-07-30 Patient Satisfaction With General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Observational Study Sobot Novakovic, Suzana Cuk, Sanja Svraka, Dragan Milosevic, Dragan Cureus Anesthesiology Background Satisfaction in patients undergoing cesarean section (CS) is of great importance in every hospital. There are big differences between spinal and general anesthesia for CS in terms of outcome, recovery times, and quality of service. Methods This multicenter observational study included 1443 patients who had elective (n=622) or emergency (n=821) CS in five medical centers over the period of 16 months. Bauer questionnaire was used for measuring patient satisfaction after CS. The questionnaire contained 15 questions about anesthesia-related discomfort and satisfaction with anesthesia care. Results During the study period, 1161 (80%) patients underwent CS under general anesthesia (GA) and 282 of them (20%) received spinal anesthesia (SA) for CS. The most frequently reported anesthesia-related discomfort was pain at the surgical site (>70%), drowsiness (68%), and thirst (60%). The data on patient satisfaction showed high satisfaction that exceeded 90%. Anesthesia side effects were less frequent and the general satisfaction rate was higher in the SA group compared to the GA group (P < .001). Conclusion SA for CS had less frequent side effects and a better satisfaction rate compared to GA for CS. Hospitals need to make room for improvement of postoperative acute pain control and introduction to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for elective CS. Cureus 2023-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10386895/ /pubmed/37521592 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42666 Text en Copyright © 2023, Sobot Novakovic et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Sobot Novakovic, Suzana
Cuk, Sanja
Svraka, Dragan
Milosevic, Dragan
Patient Satisfaction With General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Observational Study
title Patient Satisfaction With General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_full Patient Satisfaction With General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_fullStr Patient Satisfaction With General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Patient Satisfaction With General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_short Patient Satisfaction With General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_sort patient satisfaction with general anesthesia compared to spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a multicenter observational study
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521592
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42666
work_keys_str_mv AT sobotnovakovicsuzana patientsatisfactionwithgeneralanesthesiacomparedtospinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT cuksanja patientsatisfactionwithgeneralanesthesiacomparedtospinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT svrakadragan patientsatisfactionwithgeneralanesthesiacomparedtospinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT milosevicdragan patientsatisfactionwithgeneralanesthesiacomparedtospinalanesthesiaforcesareansectionamulticenterobservationalstudy