Cargando…

Externally validated deep learning model to identify prodromal Parkinson’s disease from electrocardiogram

Little is known about electrocardiogram (ECG) markers of Parkinson’s disease (PD) during the prodromal stage. The aim of the study was to build a generalizable ECG-based fully automatic artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict PD risk during the prodromal stage, up to 5 years before disease dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karabayir, Ibrahim, Gunturkun, Fatma, Butler, Liam, Goldman, Samuel M., Kamaleswaran, Rishikesan, Davis, Robert L., Colletta, Kalea, Chinthala, Lokesh, Jefferies, John L., Bobay, Kathleen, Ross, G. Webster, Petrovitch, Helen, Masaki, Kamal, Tanner, Caroline M., Akbilgic, Oguz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37516770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38782-7
_version_ 1785081811493191680
author Karabayir, Ibrahim
Gunturkun, Fatma
Butler, Liam
Goldman, Samuel M.
Kamaleswaran, Rishikesan
Davis, Robert L.
Colletta, Kalea
Chinthala, Lokesh
Jefferies, John L.
Bobay, Kathleen
Ross, G. Webster
Petrovitch, Helen
Masaki, Kamal
Tanner, Caroline M.
Akbilgic, Oguz
author_facet Karabayir, Ibrahim
Gunturkun, Fatma
Butler, Liam
Goldman, Samuel M.
Kamaleswaran, Rishikesan
Davis, Robert L.
Colletta, Kalea
Chinthala, Lokesh
Jefferies, John L.
Bobay, Kathleen
Ross, G. Webster
Petrovitch, Helen
Masaki, Kamal
Tanner, Caroline M.
Akbilgic, Oguz
author_sort Karabayir, Ibrahim
collection PubMed
description Little is known about electrocardiogram (ECG) markers of Parkinson’s disease (PD) during the prodromal stage. The aim of the study was to build a generalizable ECG-based fully automatic artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict PD risk during the prodromal stage, up to 5 years before disease diagnosis. This case–control study included samples from Loyola University Chicago (LUC) and University of Tennessee-Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare (MLH). Cases and controls were matched according to specific characteristics (date, age, sex and race). Clinical data were available from May, 2014 onward at LUC and from January, 2015 onward at MLH, while the ECG data were available as early as 1990 in both institutes. PD was denoted by at least two primary diagnostic codes (ICD9 332.0; ICD10 G20) at least 30 days apart. PD incidence date was defined as the earliest of first PD diagnostic code or PD-related medication prescription. ECGs obtained at least 6 months before PD incidence date were modeled to predict a subsequent diagnosis of PD within three time windows: 6 months–1 year, 6 months–3 years, and 6 months–5 years. We applied a novel deep neural network using standard 10-s 12-lead ECGs to predict PD risk at the prodromal phase. This model was compared to multiple feature engineering-based models. Subgroup analyses for sex, race and age were also performed. Our primary prediction model was a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) that was built using 131 cases and 1058 controls from MLH, and externally validated on 29 cases and 165 controls from LUC. The model was trained on 90% of the MLH data, internally validated on the remaining 10% and externally validated on LUC data. The best performing model resulted in an external validation AUC of 0.67 when predicting future PD at any time between 6 months and 5 years after the ECG. Accuracy increased when restricted to ECGs obtained within 6 months to 3 years before PD diagnosis (AUC 0.69) and was highest when predicting future PD within 6 months to 1 year (AUC 0.74). The 1D-CNN model based on raw ECG data outperformed multiple models built using more standard ECG feature engineering approaches. These results demonstrate that a predictive model developed in one cohort using only raw 10-s ECGs can effectively classify individuals with prodromal PD in an independent cohort, particularly closer to disease diagnosis. Standard ECGs may help identify individuals with prodromal PD for cost-effective population-level early detection and inclusion in disease-modifying therapeutic trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10387090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103870902023-07-31 Externally validated deep learning model to identify prodromal Parkinson’s disease from electrocardiogram Karabayir, Ibrahim Gunturkun, Fatma Butler, Liam Goldman, Samuel M. Kamaleswaran, Rishikesan Davis, Robert L. Colletta, Kalea Chinthala, Lokesh Jefferies, John L. Bobay, Kathleen Ross, G. Webster Petrovitch, Helen Masaki, Kamal Tanner, Caroline M. Akbilgic, Oguz Sci Rep Article Little is known about electrocardiogram (ECG) markers of Parkinson’s disease (PD) during the prodromal stage. The aim of the study was to build a generalizable ECG-based fully automatic artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict PD risk during the prodromal stage, up to 5 years before disease diagnosis. This case–control study included samples from Loyola University Chicago (LUC) and University of Tennessee-Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare (MLH). Cases and controls were matched according to specific characteristics (date, age, sex and race). Clinical data were available from May, 2014 onward at LUC and from January, 2015 onward at MLH, while the ECG data were available as early as 1990 in both institutes. PD was denoted by at least two primary diagnostic codes (ICD9 332.0; ICD10 G20) at least 30 days apart. PD incidence date was defined as the earliest of first PD diagnostic code or PD-related medication prescription. ECGs obtained at least 6 months before PD incidence date were modeled to predict a subsequent diagnosis of PD within three time windows: 6 months–1 year, 6 months–3 years, and 6 months–5 years. We applied a novel deep neural network using standard 10-s 12-lead ECGs to predict PD risk at the prodromal phase. This model was compared to multiple feature engineering-based models. Subgroup analyses for sex, race and age were also performed. Our primary prediction model was a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) that was built using 131 cases and 1058 controls from MLH, and externally validated on 29 cases and 165 controls from LUC. The model was trained on 90% of the MLH data, internally validated on the remaining 10% and externally validated on LUC data. The best performing model resulted in an external validation AUC of 0.67 when predicting future PD at any time between 6 months and 5 years after the ECG. Accuracy increased when restricted to ECGs obtained within 6 months to 3 years before PD diagnosis (AUC 0.69) and was highest when predicting future PD within 6 months to 1 year (AUC 0.74). The 1D-CNN model based on raw ECG data outperformed multiple models built using more standard ECG feature engineering approaches. These results demonstrate that a predictive model developed in one cohort using only raw 10-s ECGs can effectively classify individuals with prodromal PD in an independent cohort, particularly closer to disease diagnosis. Standard ECGs may help identify individuals with prodromal PD for cost-effective population-level early detection and inclusion in disease-modifying therapeutic trials. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10387090/ /pubmed/37516770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38782-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Karabayir, Ibrahim
Gunturkun, Fatma
Butler, Liam
Goldman, Samuel M.
Kamaleswaran, Rishikesan
Davis, Robert L.
Colletta, Kalea
Chinthala, Lokesh
Jefferies, John L.
Bobay, Kathleen
Ross, G. Webster
Petrovitch, Helen
Masaki, Kamal
Tanner, Caroline M.
Akbilgic, Oguz
Externally validated deep learning model to identify prodromal Parkinson’s disease from electrocardiogram
title Externally validated deep learning model to identify prodromal Parkinson’s disease from electrocardiogram
title_full Externally validated deep learning model to identify prodromal Parkinson’s disease from electrocardiogram
title_fullStr Externally validated deep learning model to identify prodromal Parkinson’s disease from electrocardiogram
title_full_unstemmed Externally validated deep learning model to identify prodromal Parkinson’s disease from electrocardiogram
title_short Externally validated deep learning model to identify prodromal Parkinson’s disease from electrocardiogram
title_sort externally validated deep learning model to identify prodromal parkinson’s disease from electrocardiogram
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37516770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38782-7
work_keys_str_mv AT karabayiribrahim externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT gunturkunfatma externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT butlerliam externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT goldmansamuelm externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT kamaleswaranrishikesan externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT davisrobertl externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT collettakalea externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT chinthalalokesh externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT jefferiesjohnl externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT bobaykathleen externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT rossgwebster externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT petrovitchhelen externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT masakikamal externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT tannercarolinem externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram
AT akbilgicoguz externallyvalidateddeeplearningmodeltoidentifyprodromalparkinsonsdiseasefromelectrocardiogram