Cargando…

Influence of Different Mouth Rinsing Agents on Friction During Sliding Mechanics Between Orthodontic Metal Brackets and Stainless Steel Archwire: A Comparative In Vitro Study

Aim and objectives The aim of this in-vitro study is to evaluate and compare the effect of various mouth rinsing agents on frictional resistance through sliding mechanics among orthodontic metal brackets and stainless steel (SS) archwire. Materials and methods Each group comprised 15 samples of maxi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Himabindu, Datla, Venkata Prasanna, Pappala, Vamsi Krishna Reddy, Vazrala, Farhatulla, Shaik, Raghu Ram, RSVM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37525764
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41224
_version_ 1785081870245953536
author Himabindu, Datla
Venkata Prasanna, Pappala
Vamsi Krishna Reddy, Vazrala
Farhatulla, Shaik
Raghu Ram, RSVM
author_facet Himabindu, Datla
Venkata Prasanna, Pappala
Vamsi Krishna Reddy, Vazrala
Farhatulla, Shaik
Raghu Ram, RSVM
author_sort Himabindu, Datla
collection PubMed
description Aim and objectives The aim of this in-vitro study is to evaluate and compare the effect of various mouth rinsing agents on frictional resistance through sliding mechanics among orthodontic metal brackets and stainless steel (SS) archwire. Materials and methods Each group comprised 15 samples of maxillary first premolar pre-adjusted edgewise SS movable, un-bonded brackets (Koden Inc., United States) which were welded with a power arm, where 100 g of the load was suspended. Brackets were ligated with elastic modules (Koden Inc., United States) onto the perspex sheet along with 0.019" x 0.025” SS archwire (Classic Orthodontics, United States) and were suspended from the upper component of the Instron machine. The coefficient of friction was tested in dry conditions (control), artificial saliva (AS) (Wet Mouth, ICPA Health Product Ltd., India), 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) mouthwash (Hexidine, ICPA Health Product Ltd., India), 0.05% sodium fluoride (NaF) mouthwash (ACT Anti-Cavity Fluoride Mouthwash, Sanofi Company, United States), charcoal (CC) mouthwash (Hello Activated Charcoal Extra Freshening Mouthwash, Hello Products LLC, United States) and ozone-infused oil-pulling solution with coconut oil (O(3)) (O(3) Essentials, Health Ranger Store, United States). In order to calculate the coefficient of friction, 50 L was added to the test sample while moving at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The groups were compared using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey's post hoc analysis was performed for multiple pairwise comparisons. Results The coefficient of friction with the highest mean values was observed with the control group (2.01), followed by AS (1.79), and the least with O(3) (1.15). Statistically significant differences were observed with almost all groups of mouth rinsing agents, but NaF is significant with CHG and CC. However, CHG did not have any significant difference from CC. Conclusions Lower coefficient of frictional values were observed with the ozone-infused oil-pulling solution with coconut oil during sliding mechanics between metal brackets and stainless steel archwire. Almost all the mouth rinsing agents showed a significantly different coefficient of friction value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10387376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103873762023-07-31 Influence of Different Mouth Rinsing Agents on Friction During Sliding Mechanics Between Orthodontic Metal Brackets and Stainless Steel Archwire: A Comparative In Vitro Study Himabindu, Datla Venkata Prasanna, Pappala Vamsi Krishna Reddy, Vazrala Farhatulla, Shaik Raghu Ram, RSVM Cureus Dentistry Aim and objectives The aim of this in-vitro study is to evaluate and compare the effect of various mouth rinsing agents on frictional resistance through sliding mechanics among orthodontic metal brackets and stainless steel (SS) archwire. Materials and methods Each group comprised 15 samples of maxillary first premolar pre-adjusted edgewise SS movable, un-bonded brackets (Koden Inc., United States) which were welded with a power arm, where 100 g of the load was suspended. Brackets were ligated with elastic modules (Koden Inc., United States) onto the perspex sheet along with 0.019" x 0.025” SS archwire (Classic Orthodontics, United States) and were suspended from the upper component of the Instron machine. The coefficient of friction was tested in dry conditions (control), artificial saliva (AS) (Wet Mouth, ICPA Health Product Ltd., India), 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) mouthwash (Hexidine, ICPA Health Product Ltd., India), 0.05% sodium fluoride (NaF) mouthwash (ACT Anti-Cavity Fluoride Mouthwash, Sanofi Company, United States), charcoal (CC) mouthwash (Hello Activated Charcoal Extra Freshening Mouthwash, Hello Products LLC, United States) and ozone-infused oil-pulling solution with coconut oil (O(3)) (O(3) Essentials, Health Ranger Store, United States). In order to calculate the coefficient of friction, 50 L was added to the test sample while moving at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The groups were compared using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey's post hoc analysis was performed for multiple pairwise comparisons. Results The coefficient of friction with the highest mean values was observed with the control group (2.01), followed by AS (1.79), and the least with O(3) (1.15). Statistically significant differences were observed with almost all groups of mouth rinsing agents, but NaF is significant with CHG and CC. However, CHG did not have any significant difference from CC. Conclusions Lower coefficient of frictional values were observed with the ozone-infused oil-pulling solution with coconut oil during sliding mechanics between metal brackets and stainless steel archwire. Almost all the mouth rinsing agents showed a significantly different coefficient of friction value. Cureus 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10387376/ /pubmed/37525764 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41224 Text en Copyright © 2023, Himabindu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dentistry
Himabindu, Datla
Venkata Prasanna, Pappala
Vamsi Krishna Reddy, Vazrala
Farhatulla, Shaik
Raghu Ram, RSVM
Influence of Different Mouth Rinsing Agents on Friction During Sliding Mechanics Between Orthodontic Metal Brackets and Stainless Steel Archwire: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title Influence of Different Mouth Rinsing Agents on Friction During Sliding Mechanics Between Orthodontic Metal Brackets and Stainless Steel Archwire: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title_full Influence of Different Mouth Rinsing Agents on Friction During Sliding Mechanics Between Orthodontic Metal Brackets and Stainless Steel Archwire: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Influence of Different Mouth Rinsing Agents on Friction During Sliding Mechanics Between Orthodontic Metal Brackets and Stainless Steel Archwire: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Different Mouth Rinsing Agents on Friction During Sliding Mechanics Between Orthodontic Metal Brackets and Stainless Steel Archwire: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title_short Influence of Different Mouth Rinsing Agents on Friction During Sliding Mechanics Between Orthodontic Metal Brackets and Stainless Steel Archwire: A Comparative In Vitro Study
title_sort influence of different mouth rinsing agents on friction during sliding mechanics between orthodontic metal brackets and stainless steel archwire: a comparative in vitro study
topic Dentistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37525764
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41224
work_keys_str_mv AT himabindudatla influenceofdifferentmouthrinsingagentsonfrictionduringslidingmechanicsbetweenorthodonticmetalbracketsandstainlesssteelarchwireacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT venkataprasannapappala influenceofdifferentmouthrinsingagentsonfrictionduringslidingmechanicsbetweenorthodonticmetalbracketsandstainlesssteelarchwireacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT vamsikrishnareddyvazrala influenceofdifferentmouthrinsingagentsonfrictionduringslidingmechanicsbetweenorthodonticmetalbracketsandstainlesssteelarchwireacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT farhatullashaik influenceofdifferentmouthrinsingagentsonfrictionduringslidingmechanicsbetweenorthodonticmetalbracketsandstainlesssteelarchwireacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT raghuramrsvm influenceofdifferentmouthrinsingagentsonfrictionduringslidingmechanicsbetweenorthodonticmetalbracketsandstainlesssteelarchwireacomparativeinvitrostudy