Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Abdominopelvic Masses: A Prospective Study

Introduction Accurate diagnosis of deep-seated abdominopelvic masses is crucial to distinguish malignant from non-malignant lesions for proper treatment and prognosis. Ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USG-FNAC) is a cost-effective and straightforward procedure that offers rapi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baisakh, Pratima, Baisakh, Manas R, Kumari, B Shanta, Mohanty, Biswa B, Panda, Dhiren K, Pradhan, Swagatika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37529517
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41228
_version_ 1785081870956888064
author Baisakh, Pratima
Baisakh, Manas R
Kumari, B Shanta
Mohanty, Biswa B
Panda, Dhiren K
Pradhan, Swagatika
author_facet Baisakh, Pratima
Baisakh, Manas R
Kumari, B Shanta
Mohanty, Biswa B
Panda, Dhiren K
Pradhan, Swagatika
author_sort Baisakh, Pratima
collection PubMed
description Introduction Accurate diagnosis of deep-seated abdominopelvic masses is crucial to distinguish malignant from non-malignant lesions for proper treatment and prognosis. Ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USG-FNAC) is a cost-effective and straightforward procedure that offers rapid diagnosis, facilitating early initiation of treatment. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of USG-FNAC in comparison to the biopsy diagnosis of various abdominopelvic masses in a resource-limited setting. Materials and methods This prospective study enrolled 208 patients with clinically and ultrasonographically confirmed abdominopelvic masses over two years. Of these, 64 cases were excluded from the study because of the non-availability of biopsy specimens. The remaining 144 cases comprised 88 males and 56 females, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.57:1. Patients’ ages ranged from 1.5 to 65 years, with most male patients aged 51 to 60 years and female patients aged 41 to 50 years. USG-FNAC was performed on these patients using a 22G spinal needle and a 10cc disposable syringe, and no complications were reported during the procedure. The cytological findings were compared to histopathological results when available. Dry smears were stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain, while fixed smears were stained with Papanicolaou stain for cytological investigation. Results A total of 144 cases had both cytological and histological specimens available for comparison. The overall diagnostic accuracy of USG-FNAC was 90.97%, with 91.8% sensitivity for malignant lesions, 83.33% for benign lesions, and 85.7% for inflammatory lesions. Conclusions USG-FNAC provides high diagnostic accuracy for abdominopelvic masses, making it a valuable diagnostic tool in resource-limited settings. The technique allows for rapid diagnosis, triaging specimens for ancillary immunohistochemical and molecular studies, and in many cases, obviates the need for more expensive and time-consuming procedures like laparotomy and open biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10387379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103873792023-08-01 Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Abdominopelvic Masses: A Prospective Study Baisakh, Pratima Baisakh, Manas R Kumari, B Shanta Mohanty, Biswa B Panda, Dhiren K Pradhan, Swagatika Cureus Pathology Introduction Accurate diagnosis of deep-seated abdominopelvic masses is crucial to distinguish malignant from non-malignant lesions for proper treatment and prognosis. Ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USG-FNAC) is a cost-effective and straightforward procedure that offers rapid diagnosis, facilitating early initiation of treatment. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of USG-FNAC in comparison to the biopsy diagnosis of various abdominopelvic masses in a resource-limited setting. Materials and methods This prospective study enrolled 208 patients with clinically and ultrasonographically confirmed abdominopelvic masses over two years. Of these, 64 cases were excluded from the study because of the non-availability of biopsy specimens. The remaining 144 cases comprised 88 males and 56 females, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.57:1. Patients’ ages ranged from 1.5 to 65 years, with most male patients aged 51 to 60 years and female patients aged 41 to 50 years. USG-FNAC was performed on these patients using a 22G spinal needle and a 10cc disposable syringe, and no complications were reported during the procedure. The cytological findings were compared to histopathological results when available. Dry smears were stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain, while fixed smears were stained with Papanicolaou stain for cytological investigation. Results A total of 144 cases had both cytological and histological specimens available for comparison. The overall diagnostic accuracy of USG-FNAC was 90.97%, with 91.8% sensitivity for malignant lesions, 83.33% for benign lesions, and 85.7% for inflammatory lesions. Conclusions USG-FNAC provides high diagnostic accuracy for abdominopelvic masses, making it a valuable diagnostic tool in resource-limited settings. The technique allows for rapid diagnosis, triaging specimens for ancillary immunohistochemical and molecular studies, and in many cases, obviates the need for more expensive and time-consuming procedures like laparotomy and open biopsy. Cureus 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10387379/ /pubmed/37529517 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41228 Text en Copyright © 2023, Baisakh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Pathology
Baisakh, Pratima
Baisakh, Manas R
Kumari, B Shanta
Mohanty, Biswa B
Panda, Dhiren K
Pradhan, Swagatika
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Abdominopelvic Masses: A Prospective Study
title Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Abdominopelvic Masses: A Prospective Study
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Abdominopelvic Masses: A Prospective Study
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Abdominopelvic Masses: A Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Abdominopelvic Masses: A Prospective Study
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Abdominopelvic Masses: A Prospective Study
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology in abdominopelvic masses: a prospective study
topic Pathology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37529517
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41228
work_keys_str_mv AT baisakhpratima diagnosticaccuracyofultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyinabdominopelvicmassesaprospectivestudy
AT baisakhmanasr diagnosticaccuracyofultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyinabdominopelvicmassesaprospectivestudy
AT kumaribshanta diagnosticaccuracyofultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyinabdominopelvicmassesaprospectivestudy
AT mohantybiswab diagnosticaccuracyofultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyinabdominopelvicmassesaprospectivestudy
AT pandadhirenk diagnosticaccuracyofultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyinabdominopelvicmassesaprospectivestudy
AT pradhanswagatika diagnosticaccuracyofultrasonographyguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyinabdominopelvicmassesaprospectivestudy