Cargando…

Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults

AIMS AND METHOD: Recently, the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+ (HoNOS65+) were revised. Twenty-five experts from Australia and New Zealand completed an anonymous web-based survey about the content validity of the revised measure, the HoNOS Older Adults (HoNOS OA). RESULTS: All 12 HoNOS OA sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Meredith G., Tapp, Caley, Arnautovska, Urska, Coombs, Tim, Dickson, Rosemary, Smith, Mark, Jury, Angela, Lai, Jennifer, James, Mick, Painter, Jon, Burgess, Philip M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35916442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2022.37
_version_ 1785081880346886144
author Harris, Meredith G.
Tapp, Caley
Arnautovska, Urska
Coombs, Tim
Dickson, Rosemary
Smith, Mark
Jury, Angela
Lai, Jennifer
James, Mick
Painter, Jon
Burgess, Philip M.
author_facet Harris, Meredith G.
Tapp, Caley
Arnautovska, Urska
Coombs, Tim
Dickson, Rosemary
Smith, Mark
Jury, Angela
Lai, Jennifer
James, Mick
Painter, Jon
Burgess, Philip M.
author_sort Harris, Meredith G.
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND METHOD: Recently, the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+ (HoNOS65+) were revised. Twenty-five experts from Australia and New Zealand completed an anonymous web-based survey about the content validity of the revised measure, the HoNOS Older Adults (HoNOS OA). RESULTS: All 12 HoNOS OA scales were rated by most (≥75%) experts as ‘important’ or ‘very important’ for determining overall clinical severity among older adults. Ratings of sensitivity to change, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness were more variable, but mostly positive. Experts’ comments provided possible explanations. For example, some experts suggested modifying or expanding the glossary examples for some scales (e.g. those measuring problems with relationships and problems with activities of daily living) to be more older adult-specific. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Experts agreed that the HoNOS OA measures important constructs. Training may need to orient experienced raters to the rationale for some revisions. Further psychometric testing of the HoNOS OA is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10387420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103874202023-08-01 Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults Harris, Meredith G. Tapp, Caley Arnautovska, Urska Coombs, Tim Dickson, Rosemary Smith, Mark Jury, Angela Lai, Jennifer James, Mick Painter, Jon Burgess, Philip M. BJPsych Bull Original Papers AIMS AND METHOD: Recently, the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+ (HoNOS65+) were revised. Twenty-five experts from Australia and New Zealand completed an anonymous web-based survey about the content validity of the revised measure, the HoNOS Older Adults (HoNOS OA). RESULTS: All 12 HoNOS OA scales were rated by most (≥75%) experts as ‘important’ or ‘very important’ for determining overall clinical severity among older adults. Ratings of sensitivity to change, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness were more variable, but mostly positive. Experts’ comments provided possible explanations. For example, some experts suggested modifying or expanding the glossary examples for some scales (e.g. those measuring problems with relationships and problems with activities of daily living) to be more older adult-specific. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Experts agreed that the HoNOS OA measures important constructs. Training may need to orient experienced raters to the rationale for some revisions. Further psychometric testing of the HoNOS OA is recommended. Cambridge University Press 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10387420/ /pubmed/35916442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2022.37 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Harris, Meredith G.
Tapp, Caley
Arnautovska, Urska
Coombs, Tim
Dickson, Rosemary
Smith, Mark
Jury, Angela
Lai, Jennifer
James, Mick
Painter, Jon
Burgess, Philip M.
Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults
title Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults
title_full Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults
title_fullStr Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults
title_short Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults
title_sort assessing the content validity of the revised health of the nation outcome scales 65+: the honos older adults
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35916442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2022.37
work_keys_str_mv AT harrismeredithg assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults
AT tappcaley assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults
AT arnautovskaurska assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults
AT coombstim assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults
AT dicksonrosemary assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults
AT smithmark assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults
AT juryangela assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults
AT laijennifer assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults
AT jamesmick assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults
AT painterjon assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults
AT burgessphilipm assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults