Cargando…
Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults
AIMS AND METHOD: Recently, the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+ (HoNOS65+) were revised. Twenty-five experts from Australia and New Zealand completed an anonymous web-based survey about the content validity of the revised measure, the HoNOS Older Adults (HoNOS OA). RESULTS: All 12 HoNOS OA sc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35916442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2022.37 |
_version_ | 1785081880346886144 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Meredith G. Tapp, Caley Arnautovska, Urska Coombs, Tim Dickson, Rosemary Smith, Mark Jury, Angela Lai, Jennifer James, Mick Painter, Jon Burgess, Philip M. |
author_facet | Harris, Meredith G. Tapp, Caley Arnautovska, Urska Coombs, Tim Dickson, Rosemary Smith, Mark Jury, Angela Lai, Jennifer James, Mick Painter, Jon Burgess, Philip M. |
author_sort | Harris, Meredith G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS AND METHOD: Recently, the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+ (HoNOS65+) were revised. Twenty-five experts from Australia and New Zealand completed an anonymous web-based survey about the content validity of the revised measure, the HoNOS Older Adults (HoNOS OA). RESULTS: All 12 HoNOS OA scales were rated by most (≥75%) experts as ‘important’ or ‘very important’ for determining overall clinical severity among older adults. Ratings of sensitivity to change, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness were more variable, but mostly positive. Experts’ comments provided possible explanations. For example, some experts suggested modifying or expanding the glossary examples for some scales (e.g. those measuring problems with relationships and problems with activities of daily living) to be more older adult-specific. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Experts agreed that the HoNOS OA measures important constructs. Training may need to orient experienced raters to the rationale for some revisions. Further psychometric testing of the HoNOS OA is recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10387420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103874202023-08-01 Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults Harris, Meredith G. Tapp, Caley Arnautovska, Urska Coombs, Tim Dickson, Rosemary Smith, Mark Jury, Angela Lai, Jennifer James, Mick Painter, Jon Burgess, Philip M. BJPsych Bull Original Papers AIMS AND METHOD: Recently, the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+ (HoNOS65+) were revised. Twenty-five experts from Australia and New Zealand completed an anonymous web-based survey about the content validity of the revised measure, the HoNOS Older Adults (HoNOS OA). RESULTS: All 12 HoNOS OA scales were rated by most (≥75%) experts as ‘important’ or ‘very important’ for determining overall clinical severity among older adults. Ratings of sensitivity to change, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness were more variable, but mostly positive. Experts’ comments provided possible explanations. For example, some experts suggested modifying or expanding the glossary examples for some scales (e.g. those measuring problems with relationships and problems with activities of daily living) to be more older adult-specific. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Experts agreed that the HoNOS OA measures important constructs. Training may need to orient experienced raters to the rationale for some revisions. Further psychometric testing of the HoNOS OA is recommended. Cambridge University Press 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10387420/ /pubmed/35916442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2022.37 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Harris, Meredith G. Tapp, Caley Arnautovska, Urska Coombs, Tim Dickson, Rosemary Smith, Mark Jury, Angela Lai, Jennifer James, Mick Painter, Jon Burgess, Philip M. Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults |
title | Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults |
title_full | Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults |
title_fullStr | Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults |
title_short | Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults |
title_sort | assessing the content validity of the revised health of the nation outcome scales 65+: the honos older adults |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35916442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2022.37 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrismeredithg assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults AT tappcaley assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults AT arnautovskaurska assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults AT coombstim assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults AT dicksonrosemary assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults AT smithmark assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults AT juryangela assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults AT laijennifer assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults AT jamesmick assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults AT painterjon assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults AT burgessphilipm assessingthecontentvalidityoftherevisedhealthofthenationoutcomescales65thehonosolderadults |