Cargando…

180° view on general practitioners’ leadership skills: practice-level comparisons of leader and staff assessments using data from the cluster-randomised controlled IMPROVEjob study

OBJECTIVES: Strong primary care leaders are needed to assure high quality services for patient populations. This study analysed general practitioners’ (GP) leadership skills comparing practice-level self and staff assessments based on the full range of leadership model and the leader-member exchange...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt, Manuela, Seifried-Dübon, Tanja, Göbel, Julian, Degen, Lukas, Werners, Brigitte, Grot, Matthias, Rind, Esther, Pieper, Claudia, Jöckel, Karl-Heinz, Minder, Karen, Rieger, Monika A, Weltermann, Birgitta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37500272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066298
_version_ 1785081923853352960
author Schmidt, Manuela
Seifried-Dübon, Tanja
Göbel, Julian
Degen, Lukas
Werners, Brigitte
Grot, Matthias
Rind, Esther
Pieper, Claudia
Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
Minder, Karen
Rieger, Monika A
Weltermann, Birgitta
author_facet Schmidt, Manuela
Seifried-Dübon, Tanja
Göbel, Julian
Degen, Lukas
Werners, Brigitte
Grot, Matthias
Rind, Esther
Pieper, Claudia
Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
Minder, Karen
Rieger, Monika A
Weltermann, Birgitta
author_sort Schmidt, Manuela
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Strong primary care leaders are needed to assure high quality services for patient populations. This study analysed general practitioners’ (GP) leadership skills comparing practice-level self and staff assessments based on the full range of leadership model and the leader-member exchange (LMX). SETTING: The questionnaire survey was conducted among German general practice leaders and their staff participating in the IMPROVEjob trial. PARTICIPANTS: The study population comprised 60 German general practices with 366 participants: 84 GP practice leaders and 282 employees (28 physicians and 254 practice assistants). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Leadership skills of the practice leaders were measured using the Integrative Leadership Questionnaire (German Fragebogen für integrative Führung) and the LMX-7 questionnaire. Leaders rated themselves and practice staff rated their leaders. The data was analysed by paired mean comparisons on the practice level. RESULTS: For most leadership dimensions, practice leaders rated themselves higher than their employees rated them. Differences were found for transformational leadership (p<0.001, d=0.41), especially for the dimensions ‘innovation’ (p<0.001, d=0.69) and ‘individuality focus’ (p<0.001, d=0.50). For transactional leadership, the dimension ‘goal setting’ differed significantly (p<0.01, d=0.30) but not the other dimensions. Scores for negative leadership were low and showed no differences between leaders and employees. Interestingly, employed physicians’ rated their practice leaders higher on the two transformational (‘performance development’, ‘providing a vision’) and all transactional dimensions. The LMX-7 scale showed high quality relationships between leaders and employees. CONCLUSIONS: This 180° analysis of GPs’ leadership skills with self and employee ratings indicated good relationships. There is a potential to improve leadership regarding goal-setting, innovation and focusing on individual team members. These results allow for the development of targeted interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00012677. Registered 16 October 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10387622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103876222023-08-01 180° view on general practitioners’ leadership skills: practice-level comparisons of leader and staff assessments using data from the cluster-randomised controlled IMPROVEjob study Schmidt, Manuela Seifried-Dübon, Tanja Göbel, Julian Degen, Lukas Werners, Brigitte Grot, Matthias Rind, Esther Pieper, Claudia Jöckel, Karl-Heinz Minder, Karen Rieger, Monika A Weltermann, Birgitta BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Strong primary care leaders are needed to assure high quality services for patient populations. This study analysed general practitioners’ (GP) leadership skills comparing practice-level self and staff assessments based on the full range of leadership model and the leader-member exchange (LMX). SETTING: The questionnaire survey was conducted among German general practice leaders and their staff participating in the IMPROVEjob trial. PARTICIPANTS: The study population comprised 60 German general practices with 366 participants: 84 GP practice leaders and 282 employees (28 physicians and 254 practice assistants). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Leadership skills of the practice leaders were measured using the Integrative Leadership Questionnaire (German Fragebogen für integrative Führung) and the LMX-7 questionnaire. Leaders rated themselves and practice staff rated their leaders. The data was analysed by paired mean comparisons on the practice level. RESULTS: For most leadership dimensions, practice leaders rated themselves higher than their employees rated them. Differences were found for transformational leadership (p<0.001, d=0.41), especially for the dimensions ‘innovation’ (p<0.001, d=0.69) and ‘individuality focus’ (p<0.001, d=0.50). For transactional leadership, the dimension ‘goal setting’ differed significantly (p<0.01, d=0.30) but not the other dimensions. Scores for negative leadership were low and showed no differences between leaders and employees. Interestingly, employed physicians’ rated their practice leaders higher on the two transformational (‘performance development’, ‘providing a vision’) and all transactional dimensions. The LMX-7 scale showed high quality relationships between leaders and employees. CONCLUSIONS: This 180° analysis of GPs’ leadership skills with self and employee ratings indicated good relationships. There is a potential to improve leadership regarding goal-setting, innovation and focusing on individual team members. These results allow for the development of targeted interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00012677. Registered 16 October 2019. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10387622/ /pubmed/37500272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066298 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Schmidt, Manuela
Seifried-Dübon, Tanja
Göbel, Julian
Degen, Lukas
Werners, Brigitte
Grot, Matthias
Rind, Esther
Pieper, Claudia
Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
Minder, Karen
Rieger, Monika A
Weltermann, Birgitta
180° view on general practitioners’ leadership skills: practice-level comparisons of leader and staff assessments using data from the cluster-randomised controlled IMPROVEjob study
title 180° view on general practitioners’ leadership skills: practice-level comparisons of leader and staff assessments using data from the cluster-randomised controlled IMPROVEjob study
title_full 180° view on general practitioners’ leadership skills: practice-level comparisons of leader and staff assessments using data from the cluster-randomised controlled IMPROVEjob study
title_fullStr 180° view on general practitioners’ leadership skills: practice-level comparisons of leader and staff assessments using data from the cluster-randomised controlled IMPROVEjob study
title_full_unstemmed 180° view on general practitioners’ leadership skills: practice-level comparisons of leader and staff assessments using data from the cluster-randomised controlled IMPROVEjob study
title_short 180° view on general practitioners’ leadership skills: practice-level comparisons of leader and staff assessments using data from the cluster-randomised controlled IMPROVEjob study
title_sort 180° view on general practitioners’ leadership skills: practice-level comparisons of leader and staff assessments using data from the cluster-randomised controlled improvejob study
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37500272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066298
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidtmanuela 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT seifrieddubontanja 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT gobeljulian 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT degenlukas 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT wernersbrigitte 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT grotmatthias 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT rindesther 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT pieperclaudia 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT jockelkarlheinz 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT minderkaren 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT riegermonikaa 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT weltermannbirgitta 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy
AT 180viewongeneralpractitionersleadershipskillspracticelevelcomparisonsofleaderandstaffassessmentsusingdatafromtheclusterrandomisedcontrolledimprovejobstudy