Cargando…
Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) against percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) for liver abscess. DESIGN: Systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Airiti Li...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37518084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072736 |
_version_ | 1785081932897320960 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Jin-Wei Chen, Chung-Ting Hsieh, Ming-Shun Lee, I-Hsin Yen, David Hung-Tsang Cheng, Hao-Min Hsu, Teh-Fu |
author_facet | Lin, Jin-Wei Chen, Chung-Ting Hsieh, Ming-Shun Lee, I-Hsin Yen, David Hung-Tsang Cheng, Hao-Min Hsu, Teh-Fu |
author_sort | Lin, Jin-Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) against percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) for liver abscess. DESIGN: Systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Airiti Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception up to 16 March 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared PCD to PNA for liver abscess were considered eligible, without restriction on language. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Primary outcome was treatment success rate. Depending on heterogeneity, either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model was used to derive overall estimates. Review Manager V.5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis was performed using the Trial Sequential Analysis software. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS: Ten trials totalling 1287 individuals were included. Pooled analysis revealed that PCD, when compared with PNA, enhanced treatment success rate (risk ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.25). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated this robust finding with required information size attained. For large abscesses, subgroup analysis favoured PCD (test of subgroup difference, p<0.001). In comparison to PNA, pooled analysis indicated a significant benefit of PCD on time to achieve clinical improvement or complete clinical relief (mean differences (MD) −2.53 days; 95% CI −3.54 to –1.52) in six studies with 1000 patients; time to achieve a 50% reduction in abscess size (MD −2.49 days; 95% CI −3.59 to –1.38) in five studies with 772 patients; and duration of intravenous antibiotic use (MD −4.04 days, 95% CI −5.99 to −2.10) in four studies with 763 patients. In-hospital mortality and complications were not different. CONCLUSION: In patients with liver abscess, ultrasound-guided PCD raises the treatment success rate by 136 in 1000 patients, improves clinical outcomes by 3 days and reduces the need for intravenous antibiotics by 4 days. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022316540. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10387661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103876612023-08-01 Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Lin, Jin-Wei Chen, Chung-Ting Hsieh, Ming-Shun Lee, I-Hsin Yen, David Hung-Tsang Cheng, Hao-Min Hsu, Teh-Fu BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) against percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) for liver abscess. DESIGN: Systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Airiti Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception up to 16 March 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared PCD to PNA for liver abscess were considered eligible, without restriction on language. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Primary outcome was treatment success rate. Depending on heterogeneity, either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model was used to derive overall estimates. Review Manager V.5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis was performed using the Trial Sequential Analysis software. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS: Ten trials totalling 1287 individuals were included. Pooled analysis revealed that PCD, when compared with PNA, enhanced treatment success rate (risk ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.25). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated this robust finding with required information size attained. For large abscesses, subgroup analysis favoured PCD (test of subgroup difference, p<0.001). In comparison to PNA, pooled analysis indicated a significant benefit of PCD on time to achieve clinical improvement or complete clinical relief (mean differences (MD) −2.53 days; 95% CI −3.54 to –1.52) in six studies with 1000 patients; time to achieve a 50% reduction in abscess size (MD −2.49 days; 95% CI −3.59 to –1.38) in five studies with 772 patients; and duration of intravenous antibiotic use (MD −4.04 days, 95% CI −5.99 to −2.10) in four studies with 763 patients. In-hospital mortality and complications were not different. CONCLUSION: In patients with liver abscess, ultrasound-guided PCD raises the treatment success rate by 136 in 1000 patients, improves clinical outcomes by 3 days and reduces the need for intravenous antibiotics by 4 days. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022316540. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10387661/ /pubmed/37518084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072736 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Gastroenterology and Hepatology Lin, Jin-Wei Chen, Chung-Ting Hsieh, Ming-Shun Lee, I-Hsin Yen, David Hung-Tsang Cheng, Hao-Min Hsu, Teh-Fu Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title | Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_full | Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_fullStr | Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_short | Percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_sort | percutaneous catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration for liver abscess: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
topic | Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37518084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linjinwei percutaneouscatheterdrainageversuspercutaneousneedleaspirationforliverabscessasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT chenchungting percutaneouscatheterdrainageversuspercutaneousneedleaspirationforliverabscessasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT hsiehmingshun percutaneouscatheterdrainageversuspercutaneousneedleaspirationforliverabscessasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT leeihsin percutaneouscatheterdrainageversuspercutaneousneedleaspirationforliverabscessasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT yendavidhungtsang percutaneouscatheterdrainageversuspercutaneousneedleaspirationforliverabscessasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT chenghaomin percutaneouscatheterdrainageversuspercutaneousneedleaspirationforliverabscessasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT hsutehfu percutaneouscatheterdrainageversuspercutaneousneedleaspirationforliverabscessasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis |