Cargando…
Development and validation of the MAnchester Needs Tool for Injured Children (MANTIC)
OBJECTIVE: To develop a measure of the needs injured children and their families’ needs throughout recovery; The MAnchester Needs Tool for Injured Children (MANTIC). DESIGN: Tool development, psychometric testing. SETTING: Five children's major trauma centres in England. PARTICIPANTS: Children...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36872874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155231158475 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To develop a measure of the needs injured children and their families’ needs throughout recovery; The MAnchester Needs Tool for Injured Children (MANTIC). DESIGN: Tool development, psychometric testing. SETTING: Five children's major trauma centres in England. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 2 to 16 years with any type of moderate/severe injury(ies) treated in a major trauma centre within 12 months of injury, plus their parents. METHODS: Stage 1a (Item generation): Interviews with injured children and their parents to generate draft items. Stage 1b (Co-production): Feedback about item clarity, relevance and appropriate response options was provided by parents and the patient and public involvement group. Stage 2 (Psychometric development): Completion of the prototype MANTIC by injured children and their parents with restructuring (as necessary) to establish construct validity. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlation with quality of life (EQ-5D-Y). MANTICs were repeated 2 weeks later to assess test–retest reliability. RESULTS: Stages 1a,b: Interviews (13 injured children, 19 parents) generated 64 items with semantic differential four-point response scale (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree). Stage 2: One hundred and forty-four participants completed MANTIC questionnaires (mean age 9.8 years, SD 3.8; 68.1% male). Item responses were strong requiring only minor changes to establish construct validity. Concurrent validity with quality of life was moderate (r = 0.55, P < 0.01) as was test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.46 and 0.59, P < 0.001). Uni-dimensionality was strong (Cronbach's α > 0.7) CONCLUSION: The MANTIC is a feasible, acceptable, valid self-report measure of the needs of injured children and their families, freely available for clinical or research purposes. |
---|