Cargando…

Nonoperative Treatment for Traumatic Partial Graft Rupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 2-Year Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND: There are no studies on the nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft rupture. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes and failure rates between nonoperative treatment and revision ACL re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoon, Kyung Ho, Park, Cheol Hee, Lee, Hee Sung, Hwang, Sung Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37529528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231182124
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There are no studies on the nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft rupture. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes and failure rates between nonoperative treatment and revision ACL reconstruction for traumatic partial ACL graft rupture. We hypothesized that the outcomes and failure rates would be comparable and that nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial ACL graft rupture can produce satisfactory outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 2114 patients treated for isolated ACL rupture between January 2000 and June 2020. Patients with traumatic partial graft rupture after ACL reconstruction with minimum 2-year follow-up data were included. Patients who met all the following conditions were candidates for nonoperative treatment: (1) Lachman or pivot-shift grade 0 or 1 at 6 months after ACL reconstruction, (2) ACL graft with low to intermediate signal intensity on 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (3) MRI after reinjury showing definite evidence of trauma, some fibers remaining in continuity of the ACL graft, and no anterior tibial subluxation in the sagittal plane. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment method: nonoperative treatment (group A) and revision ACL reconstruction (group B). Clinical scores, laxity test results, radiological outcomes, and graft failures were compared between the groups. RESULTS: In total, 47 patients had traumatic partial graft rupture (group A, n = 10; group B, n = 37). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of clinical scores, laxity tests, radiological outcomes, or graft failure. CONCLUSION: The clinical and radiological outcomes of nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial graft rupture after ACL reconstruction were comparable with those of revision ACL reconstruction. Nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial ACL graft rupture can produce satisfactory outcomes in selected patients.