Cargando…

Best practices in designing preapproval information engagements for US health care decision makers

As high-cost and innovative therapies continue to enter the market, health care decision makers (HCDMs) are expressing a need for early information on a product’s clinical and economic impacts. Preapproval information exchange (PIE) fulfills these data needs by allowing manufacturers to share drug i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dodda, Sai, Bannister, Breyanne, Hydery, Tasmina, Gorey, Claire, Dunlap, Sarah, Mody, Lorie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36840953
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.3.245
_version_ 1785081997114212352
author Dodda, Sai
Bannister, Breyanne
Hydery, Tasmina
Gorey, Claire
Dunlap, Sarah
Mody, Lorie
author_facet Dodda, Sai
Bannister, Breyanne
Hydery, Tasmina
Gorey, Claire
Dunlap, Sarah
Mody, Lorie
author_sort Dodda, Sai
collection PubMed
description As high-cost and innovative therapies continue to enter the market, health care decision makers (HCDMs) are expressing a need for early information on a product’s clinical and economic impacts. Preapproval information exchange (PIE) fulfills these data needs by allowing manufacturers to share drug information with HCDMs prior to US Food and Drug Administration approval. With recent regulatory milestones, such as the Pre-approval Information Exchange Act of 2022, HCDMs look to leverage PIE to forecast budgets and inform reimbursement decisions. However, a lack of stakeholder alignment has challenged the evolving applications of PIE. In addition, manufacturers are still seeking regulatory clarity regarding best practices, and many are developing their own policies for content dissemination. Varying practices have led to heterogeneity of preapproval communications across manufacturers, which may not fully align with HCDM needs and interests. However, recently collected survey data from FormularyDecisions, which focused on HCDM perceptions of both PIE webinars and other formats of PIE (eg, PIE decks and dossiers), indicate that HCDMs have strong preferences regarding the timing and content shared in preapproval engagements. Additionally, product indication and clinical trial information are highly valued, and although desired by HCDMs in other studies, in FormularyDecisions survey data, exact pricing data do not currently appear to be a critical component of PIE. Preapproval communications are expected less than 1 year before anticipated product approval, and PIE webinars, specifically, should prioritize therapeutic areas and products anticipated to have a significant impact on organizational budgets. Although HCDMs prefer nonmanufacturer representatives for PIE webinars and virtual presentations, health outcome liaisons or medical science liaisons are ideal among manufacturer representatives for in-person preapproval engagements. The expectations of HCDMs should be considered as manufacturers establish PIE practices to ensure the exchange of quality and relevant information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10387941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103879412023-07-31 Best practices in designing preapproval information engagements for US health care decision makers Dodda, Sai Bannister, Breyanne Hydery, Tasmina Gorey, Claire Dunlap, Sarah Mody, Lorie J Manag Care Spec Pharm Viewpoint As high-cost and innovative therapies continue to enter the market, health care decision makers (HCDMs) are expressing a need for early information on a product’s clinical and economic impacts. Preapproval information exchange (PIE) fulfills these data needs by allowing manufacturers to share drug information with HCDMs prior to US Food and Drug Administration approval. With recent regulatory milestones, such as the Pre-approval Information Exchange Act of 2022, HCDMs look to leverage PIE to forecast budgets and inform reimbursement decisions. However, a lack of stakeholder alignment has challenged the evolving applications of PIE. In addition, manufacturers are still seeking regulatory clarity regarding best practices, and many are developing their own policies for content dissemination. Varying practices have led to heterogeneity of preapproval communications across manufacturers, which may not fully align with HCDM needs and interests. However, recently collected survey data from FormularyDecisions, which focused on HCDM perceptions of both PIE webinars and other formats of PIE (eg, PIE decks and dossiers), indicate that HCDMs have strong preferences regarding the timing and content shared in preapproval engagements. Additionally, product indication and clinical trial information are highly valued, and although desired by HCDMs in other studies, in FormularyDecisions survey data, exact pricing data do not currently appear to be a critical component of PIE. Preapproval communications are expected less than 1 year before anticipated product approval, and PIE webinars, specifically, should prioritize therapeutic areas and products anticipated to have a significant impact on organizational budgets. Although HCDMs prefer nonmanufacturer representatives for PIE webinars and virtual presentations, health outcome liaisons or medical science liaisons are ideal among manufacturer representatives for in-person preapproval engagements. The expectations of HCDMs should be considered as manufacturers establish PIE practices to ensure the exchange of quality and relevant information. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10387941/ /pubmed/36840953 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.3.245 Text en Copyright © 2023, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Dodda, Sai
Bannister, Breyanne
Hydery, Tasmina
Gorey, Claire
Dunlap, Sarah
Mody, Lorie
Best practices in designing preapproval information engagements for US health care decision makers
title Best practices in designing preapproval information engagements for US health care decision makers
title_full Best practices in designing preapproval information engagements for US health care decision makers
title_fullStr Best practices in designing preapproval information engagements for US health care decision makers
title_full_unstemmed Best practices in designing preapproval information engagements for US health care decision makers
title_short Best practices in designing preapproval information engagements for US health care decision makers
title_sort best practices in designing preapproval information engagements for us health care decision makers
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36840953
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.3.245
work_keys_str_mv AT doddasai bestpracticesindesigningpreapprovalinformationengagementsforushealthcaredecisionmakers
AT bannisterbreyanne bestpracticesindesigningpreapprovalinformationengagementsforushealthcaredecisionmakers
AT hyderytasmina bestpracticesindesigningpreapprovalinformationengagementsforushealthcaredecisionmakers
AT goreyclaire bestpracticesindesigningpreapprovalinformationengagementsforushealthcaredecisionmakers
AT dunlapsarah bestpracticesindesigningpreapprovalinformationengagementsforushealthcaredecisionmakers
AT modylorie bestpracticesindesigningpreapprovalinformationengagementsforushealthcaredecisionmakers