Cargando…

Effects of different scar types on flap viability in a skin flap model: an experimental study

BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of tissues with multiple traumas, scarred pedicles, and medial scarring as a flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight rats were randomly divided into four equal groups. The modified McFarlane flap was chosen as the flap model. In G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: UZUN, Ceyhun, DEMİR, Can İlker, YAŞAR, Emrah Kağan, ASADOV, Mehdi, ALAGÖZ, Murat Şahin, CİVRİZ, Esra, VURAL, Çiğdem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10388061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36326377
http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5446
_version_ 1785082026457563136
author UZUN, Ceyhun
DEMİR, Can İlker
YAŞAR, Emrah Kağan
ASADOV, Mehdi
ALAGÖZ, Murat Şahin
CİVRİZ, Esra
VURAL, Çiğdem
author_facet UZUN, Ceyhun
DEMİR, Can İlker
YAŞAR, Emrah Kağan
ASADOV, Mehdi
ALAGÖZ, Murat Şahin
CİVRİZ, Esra
VURAL, Çiğdem
author_sort UZUN, Ceyhun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of tissues with multiple traumas, scarred pedicles, and medial scarring as a flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight rats were randomly divided into four equal groups. The modified McFarlane flap was chosen as the flap model. In Group 1 (control), a dorsal skin flap was elevated and then sutured back into original position. In the other groups, a two-phase procedure was used. In Group 2 (pedicle incision), scar tissue was created with a skin incision at the prospective pedicle site of the flap and then sutured to its original site. In Group 3 (preconditioning), multiple full-thickness traumas were performed along the entire flap body, and in Group 4 (middle incision) scar tissue was created with a skin incision at the prospective middle region of the flap. Then, after 45 days, dorsal flaps were raised in all rats and then sutured back into position. Seven days later, flap survival was evaluated through microangiography and histological evaluation of flap segments. Histopathological examination included assessment of the number of vessels, necrosis, infiltration with polymorphonuclear leukocytes, edema, fibrosis, inflammation, increase in fibroblast activity, and neovascularization. RESULTS: The flap survival rates were 66.78% in Group 1, 68.05% in Group 2, 68.5% in Group 3, and 60.01% in Group 4. The flap survival rate was significantly lower in Group 4 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in flap survival between Groups 1, 2, and 3. On microangiographic examination, the vascular network extended more distally and was densest around the scar line in Group 2. Vascularization was poorest in Group 4. On histological examination, the number of vessels tended to be greatest in Groups 3 and 4 but this was not significantly different between groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study findings showed that it may be possible to raise a flap from a previously mutilated site secondary to scar formation and multiple full-thickness traumas along the flap body. However, distal necrosis may occur in situations when the scar is positioned in the middle region of the prospective flap.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10388061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103880612023-08-01 Effects of different scar types on flap viability in a skin flap model: an experimental study UZUN, Ceyhun DEMİR, Can İlker YAŞAR, Emrah Kağan ASADOV, Mehdi ALAGÖZ, Murat Şahin CİVRİZ, Esra VURAL, Çiğdem Turk J Med Sci Research Article BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of tissues with multiple traumas, scarred pedicles, and medial scarring as a flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight rats were randomly divided into four equal groups. The modified McFarlane flap was chosen as the flap model. In Group 1 (control), a dorsal skin flap was elevated and then sutured back into original position. In the other groups, a two-phase procedure was used. In Group 2 (pedicle incision), scar tissue was created with a skin incision at the prospective pedicle site of the flap and then sutured to its original site. In Group 3 (preconditioning), multiple full-thickness traumas were performed along the entire flap body, and in Group 4 (middle incision) scar tissue was created with a skin incision at the prospective middle region of the flap. Then, after 45 days, dorsal flaps were raised in all rats and then sutured back into position. Seven days later, flap survival was evaluated through microangiography and histological evaluation of flap segments. Histopathological examination included assessment of the number of vessels, necrosis, infiltration with polymorphonuclear leukocytes, edema, fibrosis, inflammation, increase in fibroblast activity, and neovascularization. RESULTS: The flap survival rates were 66.78% in Group 1, 68.05% in Group 2, 68.5% in Group 3, and 60.01% in Group 4. The flap survival rate was significantly lower in Group 4 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in flap survival between Groups 1, 2, and 3. On microangiographic examination, the vascular network extended more distally and was densest around the scar line in Group 2. Vascularization was poorest in Group 4. On histological examination, the number of vessels tended to be greatest in Groups 3 and 4 but this was not significantly different between groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study findings showed that it may be possible to raise a flap from a previously mutilated site secondary to scar formation and multiple full-thickness traumas along the flap body. However, distal necrosis may occur in situations when the scar is positioned in the middle region of the prospective flap. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10388061/ /pubmed/36326377 http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5446 Text en © TÜBİTAK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
UZUN, Ceyhun
DEMİR, Can İlker
YAŞAR, Emrah Kağan
ASADOV, Mehdi
ALAGÖZ, Murat Şahin
CİVRİZ, Esra
VURAL, Çiğdem
Effects of different scar types on flap viability in a skin flap model: an experimental study
title Effects of different scar types on flap viability in a skin flap model: an experimental study
title_full Effects of different scar types on flap viability in a skin flap model: an experimental study
title_fullStr Effects of different scar types on flap viability in a skin flap model: an experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different scar types on flap viability in a skin flap model: an experimental study
title_short Effects of different scar types on flap viability in a skin flap model: an experimental study
title_sort effects of different scar types on flap viability in a skin flap model: an experimental study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10388061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36326377
http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5446
work_keys_str_mv AT uzunceyhun effectsofdifferentscartypesonflapviabilityinaskinflapmodelanexperimentalstudy
AT demircanilker effectsofdifferentscartypesonflapviabilityinaskinflapmodelanexperimentalstudy
AT yasaremrahkagan effectsofdifferentscartypesonflapviabilityinaskinflapmodelanexperimentalstudy
AT asadovmehdi effectsofdifferentscartypesonflapviabilityinaskinflapmodelanexperimentalstudy
AT alagozmuratsahin effectsofdifferentscartypesonflapviabilityinaskinflapmodelanexperimentalstudy
AT civrizesra effectsofdifferentscartypesonflapviabilityinaskinflapmodelanexperimentalstudy
AT vuralcigdem effectsofdifferentscartypesonflapviabilityinaskinflapmodelanexperimentalstudy