Cargando…

Effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided caudal epidural steroid injection compared to the fluoroscopic application

BACKGROUND/AIM: Caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) has been increasingly used for treating lower back pain. However, there is still significant controversy about the efficacy and safety of different imaging techniques used to guide CESI. In this context, the objective of this study is to compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KESİLMEZ, Emrullah Cem, YÜKSEL, Kasım Zafer, BOZAN, Ayşe Azak, YAVUZ, Cengizhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10388124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476890
http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5635
_version_ 1785082041862193152
author KESİLMEZ, Emrullah Cem
YÜKSEL, Kasım Zafer
BOZAN, Ayşe Azak
YAVUZ, Cengizhan
author_facet KESİLMEZ, Emrullah Cem
YÜKSEL, Kasım Zafer
BOZAN, Ayşe Azak
YAVUZ, Cengizhan
author_sort KESİLMEZ, Emrullah Cem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: Caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) has been increasingly used for treating lower back pain. However, there is still significant controversy about the efficacy and safety of different imaging techniques used to guide CESI. In this context, the objective of this study is to compare the efficacies of fluoroscopy- and ultrasonography-guided CESI in patients with chronic lower back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The population of this retrospective, observational study consisted of all consecutive patients who underwent CESI for lower back pain between 2018 and 2020. Of the 371 patients included in the study sample, 192 had undergone fluoroscopy-guided CESI (Group F) and 179 ultrasonography-guided CESI (Group U). Patients’ pain and functional statuses were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) immediately before (baseline) and after the procedure (postintervention day 0-D0), during the second week (D15), the first month (D30), and the third month (D90) after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean age of Group F was significantly higher than that of Group U (p < 0.001). The number of patients with lumbar disc hernia was significantly higher in Group U, whereas the number of patients with spinal stenosis and lumbar disc hernia + spinal/lumbar stenosis was significantly higher in Group F (p = 0.001). The baseline and D0 ODI scores were significantly lower in Group U than in Group F (p = 0.006 and p = 0.017, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in other VAS and ODI scores (p > 0.05). Intragroup analyses revealed significant reductions in VAS and ODI scores over the follow-up period till D30 compared to the baseline scores in each group (p < 0.001). The decrease recorded in the ODI score between the D15 and baseline measurements was significantly higher in Group F than in Group U (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The study findings indicated that ultrasound-guided CESI was as effective as fluoroscopy-guided CESI in treating chronic lower back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10388124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103881242023-08-01 Effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided caudal epidural steroid injection compared to the fluoroscopic application KESİLMEZ, Emrullah Cem YÜKSEL, Kasım Zafer BOZAN, Ayşe Azak YAVUZ, Cengizhan Turk J Med Sci Research Article BACKGROUND/AIM: Caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) has been increasingly used for treating lower back pain. However, there is still significant controversy about the efficacy and safety of different imaging techniques used to guide CESI. In this context, the objective of this study is to compare the efficacies of fluoroscopy- and ultrasonography-guided CESI in patients with chronic lower back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The population of this retrospective, observational study consisted of all consecutive patients who underwent CESI for lower back pain between 2018 and 2020. Of the 371 patients included in the study sample, 192 had undergone fluoroscopy-guided CESI (Group F) and 179 ultrasonography-guided CESI (Group U). Patients’ pain and functional statuses were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) immediately before (baseline) and after the procedure (postintervention day 0-D0), during the second week (D15), the first month (D30), and the third month (D90) after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean age of Group F was significantly higher than that of Group U (p < 0.001). The number of patients with lumbar disc hernia was significantly higher in Group U, whereas the number of patients with spinal stenosis and lumbar disc hernia + spinal/lumbar stenosis was significantly higher in Group F (p = 0.001). The baseline and D0 ODI scores were significantly lower in Group U than in Group F (p = 0.006 and p = 0.017, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in other VAS and ODI scores (p > 0.05). Intragroup analyses revealed significant reductions in VAS and ODI scores over the follow-up period till D30 compared to the baseline scores in each group (p < 0.001). The decrease recorded in the ODI score between the D15 and baseline measurements was significantly higher in Group F than in Group U (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The study findings indicated that ultrasound-guided CESI was as effective as fluoroscopy-guided CESI in treating chronic lower back pain. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10388124/ /pubmed/37476890 http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5635 Text en © TÜBİTAK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
KESİLMEZ, Emrullah Cem
YÜKSEL, Kasım Zafer
BOZAN, Ayşe Azak
YAVUZ, Cengizhan
Effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided caudal epidural steroid injection compared to the fluoroscopic application
title Effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided caudal epidural steroid injection compared to the fluoroscopic application
title_full Effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided caudal epidural steroid injection compared to the fluoroscopic application
title_fullStr Effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided caudal epidural steroid injection compared to the fluoroscopic application
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided caudal epidural steroid injection compared to the fluoroscopic application
title_short Effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided caudal epidural steroid injection compared to the fluoroscopic application
title_sort effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided caudal epidural steroid injection compared to the fluoroscopic application
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10388124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37476890
http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5635
work_keys_str_mv AT kesilmezemrullahcem effectivenessofultrasonographyguidedcaudalepiduralsteroidinjectioncomparedtothefluoroscopicapplication
AT yukselkasımzafer effectivenessofultrasonographyguidedcaudalepiduralsteroidinjectioncomparedtothefluoroscopicapplication
AT bozanayseazak effectivenessofultrasonographyguidedcaudalepiduralsteroidinjectioncomparedtothefluoroscopicapplication
AT yavuzcengizhan effectivenessofultrasonographyguidedcaudalepiduralsteroidinjectioncomparedtothefluoroscopicapplication