Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain BA
The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the non‐genetically modified microorganism Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain BA by HBI Enzymes Inc. The enzyme under assessment is intended to be used in six food processes: baking processes, brewing processes, di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10388231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37529618 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8157 |
_version_ | 1785082067202080768 |
---|---|
author | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Roos, Yrjö Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Apergi, Kyriaki Fernàndez‐Fraguas, Cristina Liu, Yi Peluso, Silvia di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Roos, Yrjö Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Apergi, Kyriaki Fernàndez‐Fraguas, Cristina Liu, Yi Peluso, Silvia di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the non‐genetically modified microorganism Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain BA by HBI Enzymes Inc. The enzyme under assessment is intended to be used in six food processes: baking processes, brewing processes, distilled alcohol production, starch processing for the production of glucose syrups and other starch hydrolysates, production of dairy analogues and production of rice‐based meals. Since residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed during distillation and during the production of glucose syrups and other starch hydrolysates, dietary exposure was calculated only for the remaining four food manufacturing processes. It was estimated to be up to 4.805 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. The applicant did not provide sufficient data to demonstrate that the production strain meets the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) criteria, or proof of absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme. Therefore, the Panel was not able to conclude on the safety of the microbial source. A margin of exposure could not be calculated in the absence of toxicological studies. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and two matches with respiratory allergens were found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use (other than distilled alcohol production), the risk of allergic reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel could not conclude on the safety of this food enzyme, under the intended conditions of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10388231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103882312023-08-01 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain BA Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Roos, Yrjö Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Apergi, Kyriaki Fernàndez‐Fraguas, Cristina Liu, Yi Peluso, Silvia di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the non‐genetically modified microorganism Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain BA by HBI Enzymes Inc. The enzyme under assessment is intended to be used in six food processes: baking processes, brewing processes, distilled alcohol production, starch processing for the production of glucose syrups and other starch hydrolysates, production of dairy analogues and production of rice‐based meals. Since residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed during distillation and during the production of glucose syrups and other starch hydrolysates, dietary exposure was calculated only for the remaining four food manufacturing processes. It was estimated to be up to 4.805 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. The applicant did not provide sufficient data to demonstrate that the production strain meets the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) criteria, or proof of absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme. Therefore, the Panel was not able to conclude on the safety of the microbial source. A margin of exposure could not be calculated in the absence of toxicological studies. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and two matches with respiratory allergens were found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use (other than distilled alcohol production), the risk of allergic reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel could not conclude on the safety of this food enzyme, under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10388231/ /pubmed/37529618 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8157 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Roos, Yrjö Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Apergi, Kyriaki Fernàndez‐Fraguas, Cristina Liu, Yi Peluso, Silvia di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain BA |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain BA
|
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain BA
|
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain BA
|
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain BA
|
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain BA
|
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the non‐genetically modified bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain ba |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10388231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37529618 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT roosyrjo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT apergikyriaki safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT fernandezfraguascristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT pelusosilvia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT dipiazzagiulio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstrainba |