Cargando…

Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm

PURPOSE: Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures are challenging injuries. Multiple factors must be carefully evaluated for an adequate therapeutic strategy, such as the state of bone healing, the type of implant, the time and performed personnel of previous surgery, and the stability of fixation. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bidolegui, Fernando, Pereira, Sebastián, Munera, Mateo Alzate, Garabano, Germán, Pesciallo, Cesar A., Pires, Robinson Esteves, Giordano, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10388253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36336545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.10.001
_version_ 1785082072534089728
author Bidolegui, Fernando
Pereira, Sebastián
Munera, Mateo Alzate
Garabano, Germán
Pesciallo, Cesar A.
Pires, Robinson Esteves
Giordano, Vincenzo
author_facet Bidolegui, Fernando
Pereira, Sebastián
Munera, Mateo Alzate
Garabano, Germán
Pesciallo, Cesar A.
Pires, Robinson Esteves
Giordano, Vincenzo
author_sort Bidolegui, Fernando
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures are challenging injuries. Multiple factors must be carefully evaluated for an adequate therapeutic strategy, such as the state of bone healing, the type of implant, the time and performed personnel of previous surgery, and the stability of fixation. The aim of this study is to propose a rationale for the treatment. METHODS: The peri-implant femoral fractures (PIFFs) system, a therapeutic algorithm was developed for the management of all patients presenting a subtype A PIFF, based on the type of the original implant (extra- vs. intra-medullary), implant length and fracture location. The adequacy and reliability of the proposed algorithm and the fracture healing process were assessed at the last clinical follow-up using the Parker mobility score and radiological assessment, respectively. In addition, all complications were noticed. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation, or median and range according to their distribution. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentages. RESULTS: This is a retrospective case series of 33 PIFFs, and the mean post-operative Parker mobility score was (5.60 ± 2.54) points. Five patients (15.1%) achieved complete mobility without aids (9 points) and 1 (3.0%) patient was not able to walk. Two other patients (6.1%) were non-ambulatory prior to PPIF. The mean follow-up was (21.51 ± 9.12) months (range 6 – 48 months). There were 7 (21.2%) complications equally distributed between patients managed either with nailing or plating. There were no cases of nonunion or mechanical failure of the original implant. CONCLUSION: The proposed treatment algorithm shows adequate, reliable and straightforward to assist the orthopaedic trauma surgeon on the difficult decision-making process regarding the management of PIFF occurring in previously healed fractures. In addition, it may become a useful tool to optimize the use of the classification, thus potentially improving the outcomes and minimizing complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10388253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103882532023-08-01 Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm Bidolegui, Fernando Pereira, Sebastián Munera, Mateo Alzate Garabano, Germán Pesciallo, Cesar A. Pires, Robinson Esteves Giordano, Vincenzo Chin J Traumatol Original Article PURPOSE: Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures are challenging injuries. Multiple factors must be carefully evaluated for an adequate therapeutic strategy, such as the state of bone healing, the type of implant, the time and performed personnel of previous surgery, and the stability of fixation. The aim of this study is to propose a rationale for the treatment. METHODS: The peri-implant femoral fractures (PIFFs) system, a therapeutic algorithm was developed for the management of all patients presenting a subtype A PIFF, based on the type of the original implant (extra- vs. intra-medullary), implant length and fracture location. The adequacy and reliability of the proposed algorithm and the fracture healing process were assessed at the last clinical follow-up using the Parker mobility score and radiological assessment, respectively. In addition, all complications were noticed. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation, or median and range according to their distribution. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentages. RESULTS: This is a retrospective case series of 33 PIFFs, and the mean post-operative Parker mobility score was (5.60 ± 2.54) points. Five patients (15.1%) achieved complete mobility without aids (9 points) and 1 (3.0%) patient was not able to walk. Two other patients (6.1%) were non-ambulatory prior to PPIF. The mean follow-up was (21.51 ± 9.12) months (range 6 – 48 months). There were 7 (21.2%) complications equally distributed between patients managed either with nailing or plating. There were no cases of nonunion or mechanical failure of the original implant. CONCLUSION: The proposed treatment algorithm shows adequate, reliable and straightforward to assist the orthopaedic trauma surgeon on the difficult decision-making process regarding the management of PIFF occurring in previously healed fractures. In addition, it may become a useful tool to optimize the use of the classification, thus potentially improving the outcomes and minimizing complications. Elsevier 2023-07 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10388253/ /pubmed/36336545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.10.001 Text en © 2022 Chinese Medical Association. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Bidolegui, Fernando
Pereira, Sebastián
Munera, Mateo Alzate
Garabano, Germán
Pesciallo, Cesar A.
Pires, Robinson Esteves
Giordano, Vincenzo
Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm
title Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm
title_full Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm
title_fullStr Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm
title_short Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm
title_sort peri-implant femoral fractures: challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10388253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36336545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT bidoleguifernando periimplantfemoralfractureschallengesoutcomesandproposalofatreatmentalgorithm
AT pereirasebastian periimplantfemoralfractureschallengesoutcomesandproposalofatreatmentalgorithm
AT muneramateoalzate periimplantfemoralfractureschallengesoutcomesandproposalofatreatmentalgorithm
AT garabanogerman periimplantfemoralfractureschallengesoutcomesandproposalofatreatmentalgorithm
AT pesciallocesara periimplantfemoralfractureschallengesoutcomesandproposalofatreatmentalgorithm
AT piresrobinsonesteves periimplantfemoralfractureschallengesoutcomesandproposalofatreatmentalgorithm
AT giordanovincenzo periimplantfemoralfractureschallengesoutcomesandproposalofatreatmentalgorithm