Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder
OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is common in midlife women. The efficacy and safety of lemborexant (LEM), a competitive dual orexin receptor antagonist, was assessed for 12 months in a subgroup of midlife women (age, 40-58 y) from Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303; SUNRISE-2). METHODS: This was a randomized, doub...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37339396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002209 |
_version_ | 1785082250486874112 |
---|---|
author | Terauchi, Masakazu Cheng, Jocelyn Y. Yardley, Jane Pinner, Kate Moline, Margaret Malhotra, Manoj Inabe, Kanako Nishida, Maika Pappadopulos, Elizabeth |
author_facet | Terauchi, Masakazu Cheng, Jocelyn Y. Yardley, Jane Pinner, Kate Moline, Margaret Malhotra, Manoj Inabe, Kanako Nishida, Maika Pappadopulos, Elizabeth |
author_sort | Terauchi, Masakazu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is common in midlife women. The efficacy and safety of lemborexant (LEM), a competitive dual orexin receptor antagonist, was assessed for 12 months in a subgroup of midlife women (age, 40-58 y) from Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303; SUNRISE-2). METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled (first 6 mo) study of adults with insomnia disorder (N = 949). During treatment period 1 (TP1), participants received PBO or LEM 5 mg (LEM5) or 10 mg (LEM10). During TP2 (second 6 mo), LEM participants continued their assigned dose; PBO participants were rerandomized to LEM5 or LEM10. Assessments included patient-reported sleep- and fatigue-related measures and treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: The midlife female subgroup comprised 280 of 949 participants (TP1: PBO, n = 90 of 318 [28.3%]; LEM5, n = 82 of 316 [25.9%]; LEM10, n = 108 of 315 [34.3%]). At 6 months, median changes from baseline in subjective sleep-onset latency (in minutes) were −17.9, −20.7, and − 30.4 for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5, P = not significant; LEM10, P = 0.0310). At 6 months, mean changes from baseline in subjective wake after sleep onset (in minutes) were −37.0 (59.6), −50.1 (74.5), and −54.5 (65.4) for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5 and LEM10, P = not significant), with benefits sustained through 12 months. Greater decreases from baseline (improvement) in Insomnia Severity Index total score and Fatigue Severity Scale total score were seen with LEM versus PBO at 6 months; benefits continued through 12 months. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the total population, subjective sleep parameters improved, and improvement was sustained over time in midlife women. LEM was well tolerated, suggesting that LEM may be a potential treatment option for midlife women with insomnia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10389212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103892122023-08-01 Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder Terauchi, Masakazu Cheng, Jocelyn Y. Yardley, Jane Pinner, Kate Moline, Margaret Malhotra, Manoj Inabe, Kanako Nishida, Maika Pappadopulos, Elizabeth Menopause Original Study OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is common in midlife women. The efficacy and safety of lemborexant (LEM), a competitive dual orexin receptor antagonist, was assessed for 12 months in a subgroup of midlife women (age, 40-58 y) from Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303; SUNRISE-2). METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled (first 6 mo) study of adults with insomnia disorder (N = 949). During treatment period 1 (TP1), participants received PBO or LEM 5 mg (LEM5) or 10 mg (LEM10). During TP2 (second 6 mo), LEM participants continued their assigned dose; PBO participants were rerandomized to LEM5 or LEM10. Assessments included patient-reported sleep- and fatigue-related measures and treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: The midlife female subgroup comprised 280 of 949 participants (TP1: PBO, n = 90 of 318 [28.3%]; LEM5, n = 82 of 316 [25.9%]; LEM10, n = 108 of 315 [34.3%]). At 6 months, median changes from baseline in subjective sleep-onset latency (in minutes) were −17.9, −20.7, and − 30.4 for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5, P = not significant; LEM10, P = 0.0310). At 6 months, mean changes from baseline in subjective wake after sleep onset (in minutes) were −37.0 (59.6), −50.1 (74.5), and −54.5 (65.4) for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5 and LEM10, P = not significant), with benefits sustained through 12 months. Greater decreases from baseline (improvement) in Insomnia Severity Index total score and Fatigue Severity Scale total score were seen with LEM versus PBO at 6 months; benefits continued through 12 months. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the total population, subjective sleep parameters improved, and improvement was sustained over time in midlife women. LEM was well tolerated, suggesting that LEM may be a potential treatment option for midlife women with insomnia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10389212/ /pubmed/37339396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002209 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The North American Menopause Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Study Terauchi, Masakazu Cheng, Jocelyn Y. Yardley, Jane Pinner, Kate Moline, Margaret Malhotra, Manoj Inabe, Kanako Nishida, Maika Pappadopulos, Elizabeth Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder |
title | Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder |
topic | Original Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37339396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002209 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terauchimasakazu efficacyandsafetyoflemborexantinmidlifewomenwithinsomniadisorder AT chengjocelyny efficacyandsafetyoflemborexantinmidlifewomenwithinsomniadisorder AT yardleyjane efficacyandsafetyoflemborexantinmidlifewomenwithinsomniadisorder AT pinnerkate efficacyandsafetyoflemborexantinmidlifewomenwithinsomniadisorder AT molinemargaret efficacyandsafetyoflemborexantinmidlifewomenwithinsomniadisorder AT malhotramanoj efficacyandsafetyoflemborexantinmidlifewomenwithinsomniadisorder AT inabekanako efficacyandsafetyoflemborexantinmidlifewomenwithinsomniadisorder AT nishidamaika efficacyandsafetyoflemborexantinmidlifewomenwithinsomniadisorder AT pappadopuloselizabeth efficacyandsafetyoflemborexantinmidlifewomenwithinsomniadisorder |