Cargando…

Biomechanics of surgical knot security: a systematic review

This review aims to identify publications on quantitative biomechanical testing of surgical knot security and the physical factors that determine knot security and failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines in January 2022 utili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Yoke-Rung, McGrouther, Duncan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000298
_version_ 1785082275324493824
author Wong, Yoke-Rung
McGrouther, Duncan A.
author_facet Wong, Yoke-Rung
McGrouther, Duncan A.
author_sort Wong, Yoke-Rung
collection PubMed
description This review aims to identify publications on quantitative biomechanical testing of surgical knot security and the physical factors that determine knot security and failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines in January 2022 utilizing the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to look for objective biomechanical studies on knot security in surgery using the primary terms ‘knot security’ and ‘biomechanical testing’. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles were included. Twenty-four configurations of surface, laparoscopic, and arthroscopic knots were studied. Biomechanical tensile testing was used to evaluate knot security in vitro. Load to failure (N) and elongation at knot failure (mm) were quantified by static and cyclic testing to evaluate the knot holding capacity and failure mechanism of slippage or rupture. CONCLUSION: This review reassures that the knot configuration, suture materials, suture sizes, and number of throws are key factors in determining the knot’s security. Knot configuration has to be simple for laparoscopic and arthroscopic knots due to the confined space of the operating site. With the advent of stronger suture materials for high-tension surgical reconstructive procedures, there is an unmet need to understand the physical behavior of the knot and the factors that determine its resistance to slippage or rupture. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10389331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103893312023-08-01 Biomechanics of surgical knot security: a systematic review Wong, Yoke-Rung McGrouther, Duncan A. Int J Surg Reviews This review aims to identify publications on quantitative biomechanical testing of surgical knot security and the physical factors that determine knot security and failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines in January 2022 utilizing the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to look for objective biomechanical studies on knot security in surgery using the primary terms ‘knot security’ and ‘biomechanical testing’. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles were included. Twenty-four configurations of surface, laparoscopic, and arthroscopic knots were studied. Biomechanical tensile testing was used to evaluate knot security in vitro. Load to failure (N) and elongation at knot failure (mm) were quantified by static and cyclic testing to evaluate the knot holding capacity and failure mechanism of slippage or rupture. CONCLUSION: This review reassures that the knot configuration, suture materials, suture sizes, and number of throws are key factors in determining the knot’s security. Knot configuration has to be simple for laparoscopic and arthroscopic knots due to the confined space of the operating site. With the advent of stronger suture materials for high-tension surgical reconstructive procedures, there is an unmet need to understand the physical behavior of the knot and the factors that determine its resistance to slippage or rupture. Level of Evidence: Level IV. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10389331/ /pubmed/36912691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000298 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Reviews
Wong, Yoke-Rung
McGrouther, Duncan A.
Biomechanics of surgical knot security: a systematic review
title Biomechanics of surgical knot security: a systematic review
title_full Biomechanics of surgical knot security: a systematic review
title_fullStr Biomechanics of surgical knot security: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanics of surgical knot security: a systematic review
title_short Biomechanics of surgical knot security: a systematic review
title_sort biomechanics of surgical knot security: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000298
work_keys_str_mv AT wongyokerung biomechanicsofsurgicalknotsecurityasystematicreview
AT mcgroutherduncana biomechanicsofsurgicalknotsecurityasystematicreview