Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), a multidisciplinary and multimodal perioperative care protocol, has been widely used in several surgical fields. However, the effect of this care protocol on patients receiving minimally invasive bariatric surgery remains unclear. This meta-analysis compared t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Benjian, Chen, Jianfei, Liu, Yongfa, Hu, Shuai, Wang, Rui, Peng, Fangyi, Fang, Chen, Gan, Yu, Su, Song, Han, Yunwei, Yang, Xiaoli, Li, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36999781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000372
_version_ 1785082322081546240
author Gao, Benjian
Chen, Jianfei
Liu, Yongfa
Hu, Shuai
Wang, Rui
Peng, Fangyi
Fang, Chen
Gan, Yu
Su, Song
Han, Yunwei
Yang, Xiaoli
Li, Bo
author_facet Gao, Benjian
Chen, Jianfei
Liu, Yongfa
Hu, Shuai
Wang, Rui
Peng, Fangyi
Fang, Chen
Gan, Yu
Su, Song
Han, Yunwei
Yang, Xiaoli
Li, Bo
author_sort Gao, Benjian
collection PubMed
description Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), a multidisciplinary and multimodal perioperative care protocol, has been widely used in several surgical fields. However, the effect of this care protocol on patients receiving minimally invasive bariatric surgery remains unclear. This meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes of the ERAS protocol and standard care (SC) in patients who underwent minimally invasive bariatric surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify literature reporting the effects of the ERAS protocol on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive bariatric surgery. All the articles published until 01 October 2022, were searched, followed by data extraction of the included literature and independent quality assessment. Then, pooled mean difference (MD) and odds ratio with a 95% CI were calculated by either a random-effects or fixed-effects model. RESULTS: Overall, 21 studies involving 10 764 patients were included in the final analysis. With the ERAS protocol, the length of hospitalization (MD: −1.02, 95% CI: −1.41 to −0.64, P<0.00001), hospitalization costs (MD: −678.50, 95% CI: −1196.39 to −160.60, P=0.01), and the incidence of 30-day readmission (odds ratio =0.78, 95% CI: 0.63–0.97, P=0.02) were significantly reduced. The incidences of overall complications, major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3), postoperative nausea and vomiting, intra-abdominal bleeding, anastomotic leak, incisional infection, reoperation, and mortality did not differ significantly between the ERAS and SC groups. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis indicated that the ERAS protocol could be safely and feasibly implemented in the perioperative management of patients receiving minimally invasive bariatric surgery. Compared with SC, this protocol leads to significantly shorter hospitalization lengths, lower 30-day readmission rate, and hospitalization costs. However, no differences were observed in postoperative complications and mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10389529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103895292023-08-01 Efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis Gao, Benjian Chen, Jianfei Liu, Yongfa Hu, Shuai Wang, Rui Peng, Fangyi Fang, Chen Gan, Yu Su, Song Han, Yunwei Yang, Xiaoli Li, Bo Int J Surg Reviews Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), a multidisciplinary and multimodal perioperative care protocol, has been widely used in several surgical fields. However, the effect of this care protocol on patients receiving minimally invasive bariatric surgery remains unclear. This meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes of the ERAS protocol and standard care (SC) in patients who underwent minimally invasive bariatric surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify literature reporting the effects of the ERAS protocol on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive bariatric surgery. All the articles published until 01 October 2022, were searched, followed by data extraction of the included literature and independent quality assessment. Then, pooled mean difference (MD) and odds ratio with a 95% CI were calculated by either a random-effects or fixed-effects model. RESULTS: Overall, 21 studies involving 10 764 patients were included in the final analysis. With the ERAS protocol, the length of hospitalization (MD: −1.02, 95% CI: −1.41 to −0.64, P<0.00001), hospitalization costs (MD: −678.50, 95% CI: −1196.39 to −160.60, P=0.01), and the incidence of 30-day readmission (odds ratio =0.78, 95% CI: 0.63–0.97, P=0.02) were significantly reduced. The incidences of overall complications, major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3), postoperative nausea and vomiting, intra-abdominal bleeding, anastomotic leak, incisional infection, reoperation, and mortality did not differ significantly between the ERAS and SC groups. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis indicated that the ERAS protocol could be safely and feasibly implemented in the perioperative management of patients receiving minimally invasive bariatric surgery. Compared with SC, this protocol leads to significantly shorter hospitalization lengths, lower 30-day readmission rate, and hospitalization costs. However, no differences were observed in postoperative complications and mortality. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10389529/ /pubmed/36999781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000372 Text en © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) , which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Reviews
Gao, Benjian
Chen, Jianfei
Liu, Yongfa
Hu, Shuai
Wang, Rui
Peng, Fangyi
Fang, Chen
Gan, Yu
Su, Song
Han, Yunwei
Yang, Xiaoli
Li, Bo
Efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36999781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000372
work_keys_str_mv AT gaobenjian efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis
AT chenjianfei efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis
AT liuyongfa efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis
AT hushuai efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis
AT wangrui efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis
AT pengfangyi efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis
AT fangchen efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis
AT ganyu efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis
AT susong efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis
AT hanyunwei efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis
AT yangxiaoli efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis
AT libo efficacyandsafetyofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolonminimallyinvasivebariatricsurgeryametaanalysis