Cargando…

Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Controversy remains over the choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. AIM: The aim was to compare the risk of complication of neuraxial anaesthesia with that of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. METHODS: This systematic review w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xi, Li, Hairui, Li, Songlin, Wang, Yiou, Ma, Ruichen, Qian, Wenwei, Chen, Gang, Li, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000291
_version_ 1785082325991686144
author Chen, Xi
Li, Hairui
Li, Songlin
Wang, Yiou
Ma, Ruichen
Qian, Wenwei
Chen, Gang
Li, Jian
author_facet Chen, Xi
Li, Hairui
Li, Songlin
Wang, Yiou
Ma, Ruichen
Qian, Wenwei
Chen, Gang
Li, Jian
author_sort Chen, Xi
collection PubMed
description Controversy remains over the choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. AIM: The aim was to compare the risk of complication of neuraxial anaesthesia with that of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. METHODS: This systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022337384). The study included eligible randomised controlled trials published before February 2022. Data synthesis was performed to compare the differences between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate the influence of the publication year. A subgroup analysis was performed based on patient age and the anaesthetic technique used. A grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations assessment was performed to assess the quality of each outcome. RESULTS: Twenty randomised controlled trials and 4802 patients were included. Data synthesis revealed significant higher risk of acute kidney injury in the general anaesthesia group (P=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two techniques in postoperative short-term mortality (P=0.34), delirium (P=0.40), postoperative nausea and vomiting (P=0.40), cardiac infarction (P=0.31), acute heart failure (P=0.34), pulmonary embolism (P=0.24) and pneumonia (P=0.15). Subgroup analysis based on patient age and use of sedative medication did not reveal any significant differences. Meta-regression analysis of the publication year versus each adverse event revealed no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: A significantly higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury was found in patients receiving general anaesthesia. This study revealed no significant differences in terms of postoperative mortality and other complications between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. The results were consistent across the age groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10389547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103895472023-08-01 Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Xi Li, Hairui Li, Songlin Wang, Yiou Ma, Ruichen Qian, Wenwei Chen, Gang Li, Jian Int J Surg Reviews Controversy remains over the choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. AIM: The aim was to compare the risk of complication of neuraxial anaesthesia with that of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. METHODS: This systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022337384). The study included eligible randomised controlled trials published before February 2022. Data synthesis was performed to compare the differences between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate the influence of the publication year. A subgroup analysis was performed based on patient age and the anaesthetic technique used. A grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations assessment was performed to assess the quality of each outcome. RESULTS: Twenty randomised controlled trials and 4802 patients were included. Data synthesis revealed significant higher risk of acute kidney injury in the general anaesthesia group (P=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two techniques in postoperative short-term mortality (P=0.34), delirium (P=0.40), postoperative nausea and vomiting (P=0.40), cardiac infarction (P=0.31), acute heart failure (P=0.34), pulmonary embolism (P=0.24) and pneumonia (P=0.15). Subgroup analysis based on patient age and use of sedative medication did not reveal any significant differences. Meta-regression analysis of the publication year versus each adverse event revealed no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: A significantly higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury was found in patients receiving general anaesthesia. This study revealed no significant differences in terms of postoperative mortality and other complications between general and neuraxial anaesthesia. The results were consistent across the age groups. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10389547/ /pubmed/36912758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000291 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) , which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Reviews
Chen, Xi
Li, Hairui
Li, Songlin
Wang, Yiou
Ma, Ruichen
Qian, Wenwei
Chen, Gang
Li, Jian
Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000291
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxi comparisonofriskofcomplicationbetweenneuraxialanaesthesiaandgeneralanaesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihairui comparisonofriskofcomplicationbetweenneuraxialanaesthesiaandgeneralanaesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lisonglin comparisonofriskofcomplicationbetweenneuraxialanaesthesiaandgeneralanaesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyiou comparisonofriskofcomplicationbetweenneuraxialanaesthesiaandgeneralanaesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maruichen comparisonofriskofcomplicationbetweenneuraxialanaesthesiaandgeneralanaesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qianwenwei comparisonofriskofcomplicationbetweenneuraxialanaesthesiaandgeneralanaesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengang comparisonofriskofcomplicationbetweenneuraxialanaesthesiaandgeneralanaesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijian comparisonofriskofcomplicationbetweenneuraxialanaesthesiaandgeneralanaesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis