Cargando…

Effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study

The effect of regional versus general anesthesia on carotid endarterectomy outcomes is debated. This study assesses the effect of anesthetic technique on major morbidity and mortality and additional secondary endpoints following carotid endarterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kline, Leigh A., Kothandaraman, Venkatraman, Knio, Ziyad O., Zuo, Zhiyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37057905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000356
_version_ 1785082340098179072
author Kline, Leigh A.
Kothandaraman, Venkatraman
Knio, Ziyad O.
Zuo, Zhiyi
author_facet Kline, Leigh A.
Kothandaraman, Venkatraman
Knio, Ziyad O.
Zuo, Zhiyi
author_sort Kline, Leigh A.
collection PubMed
description The effect of regional versus general anesthesia on carotid endarterectomy outcomes is debated. This study assesses the effect of anesthetic technique on major morbidity and mortality and additional secondary endpoints following carotid endarterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective propensity-matched-cohort analysis investigating elective carotid endarterectomy patients in the 2015–2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (n=37 204). The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and major morbidity, defined as stroke, myocardial infarction, or death. Secondary endpoints included minor morbidity, bleeding events, healthcare resource utilization, and length of hospital stay. Univariate, multivariable, and survival analyses were applied. RESULTS: The 1 : 1 propensity-matched-cohort included 8304 patients (4152 in each group). Regional anesthesia was associated with similar incidences of major morbidity and mortality [odds ratio (OR), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.61–1.09); P = 0.162] and unplanned resource utilization [OR, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.78–1.11); P = 0.443], but lower incidences of minor morbidity [OR, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44–0.81); P < 0.001] and bleeding events [OR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30–0.78); P = 0.002], and a shorter length of hospital stay [1.4 vs. 1.6 days; mean difference, -0.16 days (95% CI, -0.25 to -0.07); P < 0.001]. On multivariable analysis, regional anesthesia remained independently predictive of minor morbidity [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.42–0.79); P = 0.001] and bleeding events [AOR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30–0.77); P = 0.003]. Significance was maintained on survival analysis for these two endpoints. A mortality benefit was observed on univariate [OR, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.25–1.00); P = 0.045], multivariable [AOR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.24–0.96); P = 0.043], and survival analysis (P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid endarterectomy patients receiving regional anesthesia experience favorable outcomes compared to propensity-matched general anesthesia controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10389611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103896112023-08-01 Effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study Kline, Leigh A. Kothandaraman, Venkatraman Knio, Ziyad O. Zuo, Zhiyi Int J Surg Original Research The effect of regional versus general anesthesia on carotid endarterectomy outcomes is debated. This study assesses the effect of anesthetic technique on major morbidity and mortality and additional secondary endpoints following carotid endarterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective propensity-matched-cohort analysis investigating elective carotid endarterectomy patients in the 2015–2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (n=37 204). The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and major morbidity, defined as stroke, myocardial infarction, or death. Secondary endpoints included minor morbidity, bleeding events, healthcare resource utilization, and length of hospital stay. Univariate, multivariable, and survival analyses were applied. RESULTS: The 1 : 1 propensity-matched-cohort included 8304 patients (4152 in each group). Regional anesthesia was associated with similar incidences of major morbidity and mortality [odds ratio (OR), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.61–1.09); P = 0.162] and unplanned resource utilization [OR, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.78–1.11); P = 0.443], but lower incidences of minor morbidity [OR, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44–0.81); P < 0.001] and bleeding events [OR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30–0.78); P = 0.002], and a shorter length of hospital stay [1.4 vs. 1.6 days; mean difference, -0.16 days (95% CI, -0.25 to -0.07); P < 0.001]. On multivariable analysis, regional anesthesia remained independently predictive of minor morbidity [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.42–0.79); P = 0.001] and bleeding events [AOR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30–0.77); P = 0.003]. Significance was maintained on survival analysis for these two endpoints. A mortality benefit was observed on univariate [OR, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.25–1.00); P = 0.045], multivariable [AOR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.24–0.96); P = 0.043], and survival analysis (P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid endarterectomy patients receiving regional anesthesia experience favorable outcomes compared to propensity-matched general anesthesia controls. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10389611/ /pubmed/37057905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000356 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Kline, Leigh A.
Kothandaraman, Venkatraman
Knio, Ziyad O.
Zuo, Zhiyi
Effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study
title Effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study
title_full Effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study
title_fullStr Effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study
title_short Effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study
title_sort effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37057905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000356
work_keys_str_mv AT klineleigha effectofregionalversusgeneralanesthesiaonthirtydayoutcomesfollowingcarotidendarterectomyacohortstudy
AT kothandaramanvenkatraman effectofregionalversusgeneralanesthesiaonthirtydayoutcomesfollowingcarotidendarterectomyacohortstudy
AT knioziyado effectofregionalversusgeneralanesthesiaonthirtydayoutcomesfollowingcarotidendarterectomyacohortstudy
AT zuozhiyi effectofregionalversusgeneralanesthesiaonthirtydayoutcomesfollowingcarotidendarterectomyacohortstudy