Cargando…

Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: A considerable number of risk models, which predict outcomes in mortality and readmission rates, have been developed for patients with acute heart failure (AHF) to help stratify patients by risk level, improve decision making, and save medical resources. However, some models exist in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xuecheng, Zhou, Kehua, You, Liangzhen, Zhang, Jingjing, Chen, Ying, Dai, Hengheng, Wan, Siqi, Guan, Zhiyue, Hu, Mingzhi, Kang, Jing, Liu, Yan, Shang, Hongcai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37523342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283307
_version_ 1785082369103888384
author Zhang, Xuecheng
Zhou, Kehua
You, Liangzhen
Zhang, Jingjing
Chen, Ying
Dai, Hengheng
Wan, Siqi
Guan, Zhiyue
Hu, Mingzhi
Kang, Jing
Liu, Yan
Shang, Hongcai
author_facet Zhang, Xuecheng
Zhou, Kehua
You, Liangzhen
Zhang, Jingjing
Chen, Ying
Dai, Hengheng
Wan, Siqi
Guan, Zhiyue
Hu, Mingzhi
Kang, Jing
Liu, Yan
Shang, Hongcai
author_sort Zhang, Xuecheng
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A considerable number of risk models, which predict outcomes in mortality and readmission rates, have been developed for patients with acute heart failure (AHF) to help stratify patients by risk level, improve decision making, and save medical resources. However, some models exist in a clinically useful manner such as risk scores or online calculators, while others are not, providing only limited information that prevents clinicians and patients from using them. The reported performance of some models varied greatly when predicting at multiple time points and being validated in different cohorts, which causes model users uncertainty about the predictive accuracy of these models. The foregoing leads to users facing difficulties in the selection of prediction models, and even sometimes being reluctant to utilize models. Therefore, a systematic review to assess the performance at multiple time points, applicability, and clinical impact of extant prediction models for mortality and readmission in AHF patients is essential. It may facilitate the selection of models for clinical implementation. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Four databases will be searched from their inception onwards. Multivariable prognostic models for mortality and/or readmission in AHF patients will be eligible for review. Characteristics and the clinical impact of included models will be summarized qualitatively and quantitatively, and models with clinical utility will be compared with those without. Predictive performance measures of included models with an analogous clinical outcome appraised repeatedly, will be compared and synthesized by a meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of validation studies for a common prediction model at the same time point will also be performed. We will also provide an overview of critical appraisal of the risk of bias, applicability, and reporting transparency of included studies using the PROBAST tool and TRIPOD statement. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021256416.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10389735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103897352023-08-01 Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis Zhang, Xuecheng Zhou, Kehua You, Liangzhen Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Ying Dai, Hengheng Wan, Siqi Guan, Zhiyue Hu, Mingzhi Kang, Jing Liu, Yan Shang, Hongcai PLoS One Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: A considerable number of risk models, which predict outcomes in mortality and readmission rates, have been developed for patients with acute heart failure (AHF) to help stratify patients by risk level, improve decision making, and save medical resources. However, some models exist in a clinically useful manner such as risk scores or online calculators, while others are not, providing only limited information that prevents clinicians and patients from using them. The reported performance of some models varied greatly when predicting at multiple time points and being validated in different cohorts, which causes model users uncertainty about the predictive accuracy of these models. The foregoing leads to users facing difficulties in the selection of prediction models, and even sometimes being reluctant to utilize models. Therefore, a systematic review to assess the performance at multiple time points, applicability, and clinical impact of extant prediction models for mortality and readmission in AHF patients is essential. It may facilitate the selection of models for clinical implementation. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Four databases will be searched from their inception onwards. Multivariable prognostic models for mortality and/or readmission in AHF patients will be eligible for review. Characteristics and the clinical impact of included models will be summarized qualitatively and quantitatively, and models with clinical utility will be compared with those without. Predictive performance measures of included models with an analogous clinical outcome appraised repeatedly, will be compared and synthesized by a meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of validation studies for a common prediction model at the same time point will also be performed. We will also provide an overview of critical appraisal of the risk of bias, applicability, and reporting transparency of included studies using the PROBAST tool and TRIPOD statement. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021256416. Public Library of Science 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10389735/ /pubmed/37523342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283307 Text en © 2023 Zhang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Zhang, Xuecheng
Zhou, Kehua
You, Liangzhen
Zhang, Jingjing
Chen, Ying
Dai, Hengheng
Wan, Siqi
Guan, Zhiyue
Hu, Mingzhi
Kang, Jing
Liu, Yan
Shang, Hongcai
Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis
title Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis
title_full Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis
title_short Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis
title_sort risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37523342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283307
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxuecheng riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT zhoukehua riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT youliangzhen riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT zhangjingjing riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT chenying riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT daihengheng riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT wansiqi riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT guanzhiyue riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT humingzhi riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT kangjing riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT liuyan riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT shanghongcai riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis