Cargando…
Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: A considerable number of risk models, which predict outcomes in mortality and readmission rates, have been developed for patients with acute heart failure (AHF) to help stratify patients by risk level, improve decision making, and save medical resources. However, some models exist in a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37523342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283307 |
_version_ | 1785082369103888384 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xuecheng Zhou, Kehua You, Liangzhen Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Ying Dai, Hengheng Wan, Siqi Guan, Zhiyue Hu, Mingzhi Kang, Jing Liu, Yan Shang, Hongcai |
author_facet | Zhang, Xuecheng Zhou, Kehua You, Liangzhen Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Ying Dai, Hengheng Wan, Siqi Guan, Zhiyue Hu, Mingzhi Kang, Jing Liu, Yan Shang, Hongcai |
author_sort | Zhang, Xuecheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A considerable number of risk models, which predict outcomes in mortality and readmission rates, have been developed for patients with acute heart failure (AHF) to help stratify patients by risk level, improve decision making, and save medical resources. However, some models exist in a clinically useful manner such as risk scores or online calculators, while others are not, providing only limited information that prevents clinicians and patients from using them. The reported performance of some models varied greatly when predicting at multiple time points and being validated in different cohorts, which causes model users uncertainty about the predictive accuracy of these models. The foregoing leads to users facing difficulties in the selection of prediction models, and even sometimes being reluctant to utilize models. Therefore, a systematic review to assess the performance at multiple time points, applicability, and clinical impact of extant prediction models for mortality and readmission in AHF patients is essential. It may facilitate the selection of models for clinical implementation. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Four databases will be searched from their inception onwards. Multivariable prognostic models for mortality and/or readmission in AHF patients will be eligible for review. Characteristics and the clinical impact of included models will be summarized qualitatively and quantitatively, and models with clinical utility will be compared with those without. Predictive performance measures of included models with an analogous clinical outcome appraised repeatedly, will be compared and synthesized by a meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of validation studies for a common prediction model at the same time point will also be performed. We will also provide an overview of critical appraisal of the risk of bias, applicability, and reporting transparency of included studies using the PROBAST tool and TRIPOD statement. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021256416. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10389735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103897352023-08-01 Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis Zhang, Xuecheng Zhou, Kehua You, Liangzhen Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Ying Dai, Hengheng Wan, Siqi Guan, Zhiyue Hu, Mingzhi Kang, Jing Liu, Yan Shang, Hongcai PLoS One Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: A considerable number of risk models, which predict outcomes in mortality and readmission rates, have been developed for patients with acute heart failure (AHF) to help stratify patients by risk level, improve decision making, and save medical resources. However, some models exist in a clinically useful manner such as risk scores or online calculators, while others are not, providing only limited information that prevents clinicians and patients from using them. The reported performance of some models varied greatly when predicting at multiple time points and being validated in different cohorts, which causes model users uncertainty about the predictive accuracy of these models. The foregoing leads to users facing difficulties in the selection of prediction models, and even sometimes being reluctant to utilize models. Therefore, a systematic review to assess the performance at multiple time points, applicability, and clinical impact of extant prediction models for mortality and readmission in AHF patients is essential. It may facilitate the selection of models for clinical implementation. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Four databases will be searched from their inception onwards. Multivariable prognostic models for mortality and/or readmission in AHF patients will be eligible for review. Characteristics and the clinical impact of included models will be summarized qualitatively and quantitatively, and models with clinical utility will be compared with those without. Predictive performance measures of included models with an analogous clinical outcome appraised repeatedly, will be compared and synthesized by a meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of validation studies for a common prediction model at the same time point will also be performed. We will also provide an overview of critical appraisal of the risk of bias, applicability, and reporting transparency of included studies using the PROBAST tool and TRIPOD statement. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021256416. Public Library of Science 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10389735/ /pubmed/37523342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283307 Text en © 2023 Zhang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Zhang, Xuecheng Zhou, Kehua You, Liangzhen Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Ying Dai, Hengheng Wan, Siqi Guan, Zhiyue Hu, Mingzhi Kang, Jing Liu, Yan Shang, Hongcai Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis |
title | Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis |
title_full | Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis |
title_short | Risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: A protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis |
title_sort | risk prediction models for mortality and readmission in patients with acute heart failure: a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37523342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283307 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxuecheng riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis AT zhoukehua riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis AT youliangzhen riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis AT zhangjingjing riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis AT chenying riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis AT daihengheng riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis AT wansiqi riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis AT guanzhiyue riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis AT humingzhi riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis AT kangjing riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis AT liuyan riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis AT shanghongcai riskpredictionmodelsformortalityandreadmissioninpatientswithacuteheartfailureaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis |