Cargando…
Incidental vertebral fracture prediction using neuronal network-based automatic spine segmentation and volumetric bone mineral density extraction from routine clinical CT scans
OBJECTIVES: To investigate vertebral osteoporotic fracture (VF) prediction by automatically extracted trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) from routine CT, and to compare the model with fracture prevalence-based prediction models. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37529605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1207949 |
_version_ | 1785082451590119424 |
---|---|
author | Bodden, Jannis Dieckmeyer, Michael Sollmann, Nico Burian, Egon Rühling, Sebastian Löffler, Maximilian T. Sekuboyina, Anjany El Husseini, Malek Zimmer, Claus Kirschke, Jan S. Baum, Thomas |
author_facet | Bodden, Jannis Dieckmeyer, Michael Sollmann, Nico Burian, Egon Rühling, Sebastian Löffler, Maximilian T. Sekuboyina, Anjany El Husseini, Malek Zimmer, Claus Kirschke, Jan S. Baum, Thomas |
author_sort | Bodden, Jannis |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate vertebral osteoporotic fracture (VF) prediction by automatically extracted trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) from routine CT, and to compare the model with fracture prevalence-based prediction models. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent two thoraco-abdominal CT scans during clinical routine with an average inter-scan interval of 21.7 ± 13.1 months (range 5–52 months). Automatic spine segmentation and vBMD extraction was performed by a convolutional neural network framework (anduin.bonescreen.de). Mean vBMD was calculated for levels T5-8, T9-12, and L1-5. VFs were identified by an expert in spine imaging. Odds ratios (ORs) for prevalent and incident VFs were calculated for vBMD (per standard deviation decrease) at each level, for baseline VF prevalence (yes/no), and for baseline VF count (n) using logistic regression models, adjusted for age and sex. Models were compared using Akaike’s and Bayesian information criteria (AIC & BIC). RESULTS: 420 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 9, 276 males) were included in this study. 40 (25 female) had prevalent and 24 (13 female) had incident VFs. Individuals with lower vBMD at any spine level had higher odds for VFs (L1-5, prevalent VF: OR,95%-CI,p: 2.2, 1.4–3.5,p=0.001; incident VF: 3.5, 1.8–6.9,p<0.001). In contrast, VF status (2.15, 0.72–6.43,p=0.170) and count (1.38, 0.89–2.12,p=0.147) performed worse in incident VF prediction. Information criteria revealed best fit for vBMD-based models (AIC vBMD=165.2; VF status=181.0; count=180.7). CONCLUSIONS: VF prediction based on automatically extracted vBMD from routine clinical MDCT outperforms prediction models based on VF status and count. These findings underline the importance of opportunistic quantitative osteoporosis screening in clinical routine MDCT data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10390306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103903062023-08-01 Incidental vertebral fracture prediction using neuronal network-based automatic spine segmentation and volumetric bone mineral density extraction from routine clinical CT scans Bodden, Jannis Dieckmeyer, Michael Sollmann, Nico Burian, Egon Rühling, Sebastian Löffler, Maximilian T. Sekuboyina, Anjany El Husseini, Malek Zimmer, Claus Kirschke, Jan S. Baum, Thomas Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVES: To investigate vertebral osteoporotic fracture (VF) prediction by automatically extracted trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) from routine CT, and to compare the model with fracture prevalence-based prediction models. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent two thoraco-abdominal CT scans during clinical routine with an average inter-scan interval of 21.7 ± 13.1 months (range 5–52 months). Automatic spine segmentation and vBMD extraction was performed by a convolutional neural network framework (anduin.bonescreen.de). Mean vBMD was calculated for levels T5-8, T9-12, and L1-5. VFs were identified by an expert in spine imaging. Odds ratios (ORs) for prevalent and incident VFs were calculated for vBMD (per standard deviation decrease) at each level, for baseline VF prevalence (yes/no), and for baseline VF count (n) using logistic regression models, adjusted for age and sex. Models were compared using Akaike’s and Bayesian information criteria (AIC & BIC). RESULTS: 420 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 9, 276 males) were included in this study. 40 (25 female) had prevalent and 24 (13 female) had incident VFs. Individuals with lower vBMD at any spine level had higher odds for VFs (L1-5, prevalent VF: OR,95%-CI,p: 2.2, 1.4–3.5,p=0.001; incident VF: 3.5, 1.8–6.9,p<0.001). In contrast, VF status (2.15, 0.72–6.43,p=0.170) and count (1.38, 0.89–2.12,p=0.147) performed worse in incident VF prediction. Information criteria revealed best fit for vBMD-based models (AIC vBMD=165.2; VF status=181.0; count=180.7). CONCLUSIONS: VF prediction based on automatically extracted vBMD from routine clinical MDCT outperforms prediction models based on VF status and count. These findings underline the importance of opportunistic quantitative osteoporosis screening in clinical routine MDCT data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10390306/ /pubmed/37529605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1207949 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bodden, Dieckmeyer, Sollmann, Burian, Rühling, Löffler, Sekuboyina, El Husseini, Zimmer, Kirschke and Baum https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Bodden, Jannis Dieckmeyer, Michael Sollmann, Nico Burian, Egon Rühling, Sebastian Löffler, Maximilian T. Sekuboyina, Anjany El Husseini, Malek Zimmer, Claus Kirschke, Jan S. Baum, Thomas Incidental vertebral fracture prediction using neuronal network-based automatic spine segmentation and volumetric bone mineral density extraction from routine clinical CT scans |
title | Incidental vertebral fracture prediction using neuronal network-based automatic spine segmentation and volumetric bone mineral density extraction from routine clinical CT scans |
title_full | Incidental vertebral fracture prediction using neuronal network-based automatic spine segmentation and volumetric bone mineral density extraction from routine clinical CT scans |
title_fullStr | Incidental vertebral fracture prediction using neuronal network-based automatic spine segmentation and volumetric bone mineral density extraction from routine clinical CT scans |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidental vertebral fracture prediction using neuronal network-based automatic spine segmentation and volumetric bone mineral density extraction from routine clinical CT scans |
title_short | Incidental vertebral fracture prediction using neuronal network-based automatic spine segmentation and volumetric bone mineral density extraction from routine clinical CT scans |
title_sort | incidental vertebral fracture prediction using neuronal network-based automatic spine segmentation and volumetric bone mineral density extraction from routine clinical ct scans |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37529605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1207949 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boddenjannis incidentalvertebralfracturepredictionusingneuronalnetworkbasedautomaticspinesegmentationandvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionfromroutineclinicalctscans AT dieckmeyermichael incidentalvertebralfracturepredictionusingneuronalnetworkbasedautomaticspinesegmentationandvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionfromroutineclinicalctscans AT sollmannnico incidentalvertebralfracturepredictionusingneuronalnetworkbasedautomaticspinesegmentationandvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionfromroutineclinicalctscans AT burianegon incidentalvertebralfracturepredictionusingneuronalnetworkbasedautomaticspinesegmentationandvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionfromroutineclinicalctscans AT ruhlingsebastian incidentalvertebralfracturepredictionusingneuronalnetworkbasedautomaticspinesegmentationandvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionfromroutineclinicalctscans AT lofflermaximiliant incidentalvertebralfracturepredictionusingneuronalnetworkbasedautomaticspinesegmentationandvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionfromroutineclinicalctscans AT sekuboyinaanjany incidentalvertebralfracturepredictionusingneuronalnetworkbasedautomaticspinesegmentationandvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionfromroutineclinicalctscans AT elhusseinimalek incidentalvertebralfracturepredictionusingneuronalnetworkbasedautomaticspinesegmentationandvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionfromroutineclinicalctscans AT zimmerclaus incidentalvertebralfracturepredictionusingneuronalnetworkbasedautomaticspinesegmentationandvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionfromroutineclinicalctscans AT kirschkejans incidentalvertebralfracturepredictionusingneuronalnetworkbasedautomaticspinesegmentationandvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionfromroutineclinicalctscans AT baumthomas incidentalvertebralfracturepredictionusingneuronalnetworkbasedautomaticspinesegmentationandvolumetricbonemineraldensityextractionfromroutineclinicalctscans |