Cargando…

Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the relative safety and efficacy of cannulated compression screw (CCS) and femoral neck system (FNS) in treating patients with femoral neck fractures and to provide evidence-based medical evidence for FNS in treating femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Pub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Yimin, Li, Zongyang, Lao, Kecheng, Wang, Zixiu, Zhang, Li, Dai, Shiyou, Fan, Xiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37533744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1224559
_version_ 1785082551004561408
author Zhou, Yimin
Li, Zongyang
Lao, Kecheng
Wang, Zixiu
Zhang, Li
Dai, Shiyou
Fan, Xiao
author_facet Zhou, Yimin
Li, Zongyang
Lao, Kecheng
Wang, Zixiu
Zhang, Li
Dai, Shiyou
Fan, Xiao
author_sort Zhou, Yimin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the relative safety and efficacy of cannulated compression screw (CCS) and femoral neck system (FNS) in treating patients with femoral neck fractures and to provide evidence-based medical evidence for FNS in treating femoral neck fractures. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to collect outcomes related to femoral neck fractures treated with FNS and CCS, including time to fracture healing, incidence of non-union, incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, incidence of failure of internal fixation, rate of femoral neck shortening, Harris hip score, Barthel index, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, and complications. A meta-analysis was performed using RevManv5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration) and Stata v14.0 software. RESULTS: This analysis included 21 studies involving 1,347 patients. The results showed that FNS was superior to CCS in terms of fracture healing time [mean difference (MD) = −0.75, 95% CI = (−1.04, −0.46), P < 0.05], incidence of bone non-union [odds ratio (OR) = 0.53, 95% CI = (0.29, 0.98), P = 0.04], incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head [OR = 0.49, 95% CI = (0.28, 0.86), P = 0.01], incidence of internal fixation failure [OR = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.18, 0.52), P < 0.05], rate of femoral neck shortening [OR = 0.38, 95% CI = (0.27, 0.54), P > 0.05], Harris hip score [MD = 3.31, 95% CI = (1.99, 4.63), P < 0.001], Barthel index [MD =  4.31, 95% CI = (3.02, 5.61), P < 0.05], intraoperative bleeding [MD = 14.72, 95% CI = (8.52, 20.92), P < 0.05], fluoroscopy frequency [OR = 0.53, 95% CI = (0.29, 0.98), P = 0.04], and complications [OR = 0.31, 95% CI = (0.22, 0.45), P < 0.05]. The difference between FNS and CCS in operative time was not statistically significant [MD = −2.41, 95% CI = (−6.88, 2.05), P = 0.29]. CONCLUSION: FNS treatment of femoral neck fracture can shorten the fracture healing time; reduce the incidence and translucent rate of bone non-union, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and internal fixation failure; reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications; and improve hip joint function and activity. We are confident in the findings that FNS, an effective and safe procedure for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures, is superior to CCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10390772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103907722023-08-02 Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review Zhou, Yimin Li, Zongyang Lao, Kecheng Wang, Zixiu Zhang, Li Dai, Shiyou Fan, Xiao Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the relative safety and efficacy of cannulated compression screw (CCS) and femoral neck system (FNS) in treating patients with femoral neck fractures and to provide evidence-based medical evidence for FNS in treating femoral neck fractures. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to collect outcomes related to femoral neck fractures treated with FNS and CCS, including time to fracture healing, incidence of non-union, incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, incidence of failure of internal fixation, rate of femoral neck shortening, Harris hip score, Barthel index, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, and complications. A meta-analysis was performed using RevManv5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration) and Stata v14.0 software. RESULTS: This analysis included 21 studies involving 1,347 patients. The results showed that FNS was superior to CCS in terms of fracture healing time [mean difference (MD) = −0.75, 95% CI = (−1.04, −0.46), P < 0.05], incidence of bone non-union [odds ratio (OR) = 0.53, 95% CI = (0.29, 0.98), P = 0.04], incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head [OR = 0.49, 95% CI = (0.28, 0.86), P = 0.01], incidence of internal fixation failure [OR = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.18, 0.52), P < 0.05], rate of femoral neck shortening [OR = 0.38, 95% CI = (0.27, 0.54), P > 0.05], Harris hip score [MD = 3.31, 95% CI = (1.99, 4.63), P < 0.001], Barthel index [MD =  4.31, 95% CI = (3.02, 5.61), P < 0.05], intraoperative bleeding [MD = 14.72, 95% CI = (8.52, 20.92), P < 0.05], fluoroscopy frequency [OR = 0.53, 95% CI = (0.29, 0.98), P = 0.04], and complications [OR = 0.31, 95% CI = (0.22, 0.45), P < 0.05]. The difference between FNS and CCS in operative time was not statistically significant [MD = −2.41, 95% CI = (−6.88, 2.05), P = 0.29]. CONCLUSION: FNS treatment of femoral neck fracture can shorten the fracture healing time; reduce the incidence and translucent rate of bone non-union, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and internal fixation failure; reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications; and improve hip joint function and activity. We are confident in the findings that FNS, an effective and safe procedure for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures, is superior to CCS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10390772/ /pubmed/37533744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1224559 Text en © 2023 Zhou, Li, Lao, Wang, Zhang, Dai and Fan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Zhou, Yimin
Li, Zongyang
Lao, Kecheng
Wang, Zixiu
Zhang, Li
Dai, Shiyou
Fan, Xiao
Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review
title Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review
title_full Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review
title_fullStr Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review
title_full_unstemmed Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review
title_short Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review
title_sort femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37533744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1224559
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouyimin femoralnecksystemvscannulatedscrewsontreatingfemoralneckfractureametaanalysisandsystemreview
AT lizongyang femoralnecksystemvscannulatedscrewsontreatingfemoralneckfractureametaanalysisandsystemreview
AT laokecheng femoralnecksystemvscannulatedscrewsontreatingfemoralneckfractureametaanalysisandsystemreview
AT wangzixiu femoralnecksystemvscannulatedscrewsontreatingfemoralneckfractureametaanalysisandsystemreview
AT zhangli femoralnecksystemvscannulatedscrewsontreatingfemoralneckfractureametaanalysisandsystemreview
AT daishiyou femoralnecksystemvscannulatedscrewsontreatingfemoralneckfractureametaanalysisandsystemreview
AT fanxiao femoralnecksystemvscannulatedscrewsontreatingfemoralneckfractureametaanalysisandsystemreview