A Retrospective Observational Study of Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol in Clinical Practice in the United States

BACKGROUND: Research describing patient experience and outcomes with extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (EHL rFVIII) outside of clinical trials is limited. Real-world rFVIII consumption studies, when people with hemophilia A (PWHA) switch from standard half-life (SHL) to EHL rFVIII, may help payers and clinicians make more informed treatment choices. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a retrospective, observational, U.S.-based analysis to describe clinical and demographic profiles of PWHA who switched to prophylactic rurioctocog alfa pegol. METHODS: Data were obtained from PWHA treated by 38 prescribers across 21 states using specialty pharmacy database case report forms, electronic medical records, and direct communication with providers, PWHA, or their guardians. Assessments included disease severity, pain severity, number and location of target joints, prior HA therapy, reasons for switching, treatment duration, dosing frequency, adherence, and annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) before and after switching to rurioctocog alfa pegol from SHL or another EHL rFVIII. RESULTS: Data were collected from 56 PWHA. The mean age was 26 years (range = 5-88); median age was 24 years (interquartile range = 14-34); 20% were aged < 12 years; and 89% (50/56) had severe HA. All PWHA had ≥ 12 months of rFVIII treatment before switching to rurioctocog alfa pegol. The population had a mean 1.8 target joints. Baseline subjective pain assessment was mild to moderate for 68% (38/56) of respondents. Before receiving rurioctocog alfa pegol, most PWHA received antihemophilic factor (recombinant) for prophylaxis (73%, 41/56) or breakthrough bleeding (59%, 33/56). Mean dosing frequency for prior prophylaxis was 2.8 per week for SHL rFVIII and 1.8 per week for EHL rFVIII, and 2.2 per week for all PWHA after switching to rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis. The median time on rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis was 12.0 months versus 80.8 months on previous SHL rFVIII and 13.5 months on previous EHL rFVIII. Mean ABRs on prior prophylaxis were 5.9 for SHL rFVIII (n = 35) and 4.7 for EHL rFVIII (n = 3). After switching to rurioctocog alfa pegol, the overall mean ABR reduced by 71% (5.8 to 1.7, P < 0.001) and 20/56 PWHA had no bleeding events. There was also a 20.9% reduction in the mean days per week of factor administration (P < 0.001) after switching to prophylactic rurioctocog alfa pegol. For 47 PWHA who switched from SHL rFVIII, their weekly dose decreased from 109.8 to 100.6 IU per kg with rurioctocog alfa pegol (P = 0.094). The proportion of PWHA with good/complete treatment adherence increased from 68% (38/56) on any prior rFVIII to 80% (45/56) on rurioctocog alfa pegol. The most common reason PWHA switched to rurioctocog alfa pegol was to reduce treatment infusions. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from either an SHL or EHL rFVIII to rurioctocog alfa pegol is associated with fewer bleeding episodes owing to more effective prophylaxis and improved adherence. Those who switched from an SHL rFVIII reported reduced factor consumption with rurioctocog alfa pegol. This long-acting factor is an important additional option for the care of PWHA.