Cargando…

Comparing Factor Use and Bleed Rates in U.S. Hemophilia A Patients Receiving Prophylaxis with 3 Different Long-Acting Recombinant Factor VIII Products

BACKGROUND: Recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products have been developed with improved pharmacokinetics, offering some patients the potential to extend dosing intervals, thereby reducing their dosing frequency while minimizing the occurrence of bleeding events. No clinical trials have been conducte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simpson, Mindy L., Desai, Vidhi, Maro, Géraldine S., Yan, Songkai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020842
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.19318
_version_ 1785082607370764288
author Simpson, Mindy L.
Desai, Vidhi
Maro, Géraldine S.
Yan, Songkai
author_facet Simpson, Mindy L.
Desai, Vidhi
Maro, Géraldine S.
Yan, Songkai
author_sort Simpson, Mindy L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products have been developed with improved pharmacokinetics, offering some patients the potential to extend dosing intervals, thereby reducing their dosing frequency while minimizing the occurrence of bleeding events. No clinical trials have been conducted to compare the bleeding rates and use of these long-acting products. OBJECTIVES: To (a) assess real-world use of prophylaxis regimens in patients using 1 of 3 different long-acting products—rVIII-SingleChain, rFVIIIFc, or PEG-rFVIII; and (b) compare bleeding rates, dosing frequency, and factor consumption in 3 cohorts of patients. For rVIII-SingleChain patients, these measures were also compared with the prior products these patients used. METHODS: De-identified patient chart data were collected from 11 hemophilia treatment centers in the United States. Patients were included if they had been treated with rVIII-SingleChain, rFVIIIFc, or PEG-rFVIII prophylaxis for ≥ 8 weeks at the time of data collection. Matching for age and disease severity was attempted between the 3 patient groups. Data were also collected for patients who switched from their prior FVIII product to prophylaxis with rVIII-SingleChain. RESULTS: Data were obtained for 120 male patients. The majority of patients were dosing 2 times per week or less frequently (rVIII-SingleChain 65.0%, rFVIIIFc 70.0%, and PEG-rFVIII 72.5%). Annualized bleeding rates were comparable among the 3 cohorts, with median (mean) values of 2.0 (2.6) with rVIII-SingleChain and rFVIIIFc, and 3.0 (3.7) with PEG-rFVIII. The overall median (mean) FVIII consumption in IU per kg per week (IU/kg/week) was 91.9 (91.1) with rVIII-SingleChain, 108.5 (103.6) with rFVIIIFc, and 97.6 (111.0) with PEG-rFVIII, resulting in expected mean annual consumption of 322,140 IU, 361,816 IU, and 373,100 IU, respectively, for a 70 kg patient aged ≥12 years. The mean consumption was significantly different among the 3 products for all patients (P = 0.0164) and for those dosed 2 times per week (P < 0.0001). Among patients infusing 2 times per week, median (mean) consumption with rVIII-SingleChain was 83.8 (81.2) IU/kg/week, compared with 109.6 (104.4) IU/kg/week for rFVIIIFc and 92.1 (91.5) IU/kg/week for PEG-rFVIII. Additionally, switching from prophylaxis with prior FVIII products to rVIII-SingleChain increased the proportion of patients dosing ≤ 2 times per week (20% to 65%), decreased mean consumption (103.3 to 91.9 IU/kg/week; P = 0.0164), and maintained the mean annualized bleeding rates (2.9 to 2.6; P = 0.5665). CONCLUSIONS: Results for rVIII-SingleChain confirm the findings from its pivotal trial. Analyses of annualized bleeding rates demonstrate comparable clinical outcomes of rVIII-SingleChain to the other 2 long-acting products assessed. In patients aged ≥ 12 years, rVIII-SingleChain prophylaxis may result in an 11.0% and 13.7% lower mean factor consumption than rFVIIIFc and PEG-rFVIII, respectively, representing a potential cost-saving opportunity of 34% in both cases—at the current wholesale acquisition cost of the corresponding products. In addition, in patients using rVIII-SingleChain prophylactically, consumption was reduced compared with their prior products, while bleeding control was well maintained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10391023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103910232023-08-02 Comparing Factor Use and Bleed Rates in U.S. Hemophilia A Patients Receiving Prophylaxis with 3 Different Long-Acting Recombinant Factor VIII Products Simpson, Mindy L. Desai, Vidhi Maro, Géraldine S. Yan, Songkai J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products have been developed with improved pharmacokinetics, offering some patients the potential to extend dosing intervals, thereby reducing their dosing frequency while minimizing the occurrence of bleeding events. No clinical trials have been conducted to compare the bleeding rates and use of these long-acting products. OBJECTIVES: To (a) assess real-world use of prophylaxis regimens in patients using 1 of 3 different long-acting products—rVIII-SingleChain, rFVIIIFc, or PEG-rFVIII; and (b) compare bleeding rates, dosing frequency, and factor consumption in 3 cohorts of patients. For rVIII-SingleChain patients, these measures were also compared with the prior products these patients used. METHODS: De-identified patient chart data were collected from 11 hemophilia treatment centers in the United States. Patients were included if they had been treated with rVIII-SingleChain, rFVIIIFc, or PEG-rFVIII prophylaxis for ≥ 8 weeks at the time of data collection. Matching for age and disease severity was attempted between the 3 patient groups. Data were also collected for patients who switched from their prior FVIII product to prophylaxis with rVIII-SingleChain. RESULTS: Data were obtained for 120 male patients. The majority of patients were dosing 2 times per week or less frequently (rVIII-SingleChain 65.0%, rFVIIIFc 70.0%, and PEG-rFVIII 72.5%). Annualized bleeding rates were comparable among the 3 cohorts, with median (mean) values of 2.0 (2.6) with rVIII-SingleChain and rFVIIIFc, and 3.0 (3.7) with PEG-rFVIII. The overall median (mean) FVIII consumption in IU per kg per week (IU/kg/week) was 91.9 (91.1) with rVIII-SingleChain, 108.5 (103.6) with rFVIIIFc, and 97.6 (111.0) with PEG-rFVIII, resulting in expected mean annual consumption of 322,140 IU, 361,816 IU, and 373,100 IU, respectively, for a 70 kg patient aged ≥12 years. The mean consumption was significantly different among the 3 products for all patients (P = 0.0164) and for those dosed 2 times per week (P < 0.0001). Among patients infusing 2 times per week, median (mean) consumption with rVIII-SingleChain was 83.8 (81.2) IU/kg/week, compared with 109.6 (104.4) IU/kg/week for rFVIIIFc and 92.1 (91.5) IU/kg/week for PEG-rFVIII. Additionally, switching from prophylaxis with prior FVIII products to rVIII-SingleChain increased the proportion of patients dosing ≤ 2 times per week (20% to 65%), decreased mean consumption (103.3 to 91.9 IU/kg/week; P = 0.0164), and maintained the mean annualized bleeding rates (2.9 to 2.6; P = 0.5665). CONCLUSIONS: Results for rVIII-SingleChain confirm the findings from its pivotal trial. Analyses of annualized bleeding rates demonstrate comparable clinical outcomes of rVIII-SingleChain to the other 2 long-acting products assessed. In patients aged ≥ 12 years, rVIII-SingleChain prophylaxis may result in an 11.0% and 13.7% lower mean factor consumption than rFVIIIFc and PEG-rFVIII, respectively, representing a potential cost-saving opportunity of 34% in both cases—at the current wholesale acquisition cost of the corresponding products. In addition, in patients using rVIII-SingleChain prophylactically, consumption was reduced compared with their prior products, while bleeding control was well maintained. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10391023/ /pubmed/32020842 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.19318 Text en Copyright © 2020, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Simpson, Mindy L.
Desai, Vidhi
Maro, Géraldine S.
Yan, Songkai
Comparing Factor Use and Bleed Rates in U.S. Hemophilia A Patients Receiving Prophylaxis with 3 Different Long-Acting Recombinant Factor VIII Products
title Comparing Factor Use and Bleed Rates in U.S. Hemophilia A Patients Receiving Prophylaxis with 3 Different Long-Acting Recombinant Factor VIII Products
title_full Comparing Factor Use and Bleed Rates in U.S. Hemophilia A Patients Receiving Prophylaxis with 3 Different Long-Acting Recombinant Factor VIII Products
title_fullStr Comparing Factor Use and Bleed Rates in U.S. Hemophilia A Patients Receiving Prophylaxis with 3 Different Long-Acting Recombinant Factor VIII Products
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Factor Use and Bleed Rates in U.S. Hemophilia A Patients Receiving Prophylaxis with 3 Different Long-Acting Recombinant Factor VIII Products
title_short Comparing Factor Use and Bleed Rates in U.S. Hemophilia A Patients Receiving Prophylaxis with 3 Different Long-Acting Recombinant Factor VIII Products
title_sort comparing factor use and bleed rates in u.s. hemophilia a patients receiving prophylaxis with 3 different long-acting recombinant factor viii products
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020842
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.19318
work_keys_str_mv AT simpsonmindyl comparingfactoruseandbleedratesinushemophiliaapatientsreceivingprophylaxiswith3differentlongactingrecombinantfactorviiiproducts
AT desaividhi comparingfactoruseandbleedratesinushemophiliaapatientsreceivingprophylaxiswith3differentlongactingrecombinantfactorviiiproducts
AT marogeraldines comparingfactoruseandbleedratesinushemophiliaapatientsreceivingprophylaxiswith3differentlongactingrecombinantfactorviiiproducts
AT yansongkai comparingfactoruseandbleedratesinushemophiliaapatientsreceivingprophylaxiswith3differentlongactingrecombinantfactorviiiproducts