Cargando…

Is it time to replace the star ratings adherence measures?

Measures of medication adherence to noninsulin diabetes medications (NIDM), statins, and renin angiotensin system antagonists (RASA) have been continuously used in the star ratings program since 2012. Adherence to these treatments is undoubtedly important. However, the consistent use of these measur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farley, Joel F, Urick, Benjamin Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33645237
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.399
_version_ 1785082625123155968
author Farley, Joel F
Urick, Benjamin Y
author_facet Farley, Joel F
Urick, Benjamin Y
author_sort Farley, Joel F
collection PubMed
description Measures of medication adherence to noninsulin diabetes medications (NIDM), statins, and renin angiotensin system antagonists (RASA) have been continuously used in the star ratings program since 2012. Adherence to these treatments is undoubtedly important. However, the consistent use of these measures in the star ratings program over time has limitations. The purpose of this Viewpoints article is to highlight concerns associated with the current star ratings adherence measures and to offer proposals for the improvement of the adherence measurement in the program. This scoping review outlines concerns with the validity of the 3 star ratings adherence measures. In addition, star ratings data are used to describe payment thresholds for the 3 adherence measures over time to describe concerns associated with their use. Since 2012, there has been significant growth in the proportion of patients considered adherent in the star ratings program. Rates of adherence in a 2-star plan for NIDM (79%), RASA agents (83%), and statins (79%) now exceed what is commonly reported in the clinical literature. For a plan to achieve a rating of 5 stars, more than 88% of patients must be adherent to each measure. These rates suggest a ceiling effect and a reduced ability to distinguish plan performance. In addition, concerns over the potential for plans to “game” these measures have been raised. The use of mail order services, 90-day prescription refill programs, and automatic refill reminders all improve the proportion of days covered measurement but may not reflect true adherence improvements. Given potential concerns associated with the use of the existing adherence measures, it may be time to consider their replacement. One option would be to adopt a broader inventory of chronic medications to measure adherence in the program and to rotate medication categories in the program each year. It might also be time to explore measuring patient adherence to all medications that a patient uses instead of the narrow focus on the 3 existing measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10391096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103910962023-08-02 Is it time to replace the star ratings adherence measures? Farley, Joel F Urick, Benjamin Y J Manag Care Spec Pharm Viewpoints Measures of medication adherence to noninsulin diabetes medications (NIDM), statins, and renin angiotensin system antagonists (RASA) have been continuously used in the star ratings program since 2012. Adherence to these treatments is undoubtedly important. However, the consistent use of these measures in the star ratings program over time has limitations. The purpose of this Viewpoints article is to highlight concerns associated with the current star ratings adherence measures and to offer proposals for the improvement of the adherence measurement in the program. This scoping review outlines concerns with the validity of the 3 star ratings adherence measures. In addition, star ratings data are used to describe payment thresholds for the 3 adherence measures over time to describe concerns associated with their use. Since 2012, there has been significant growth in the proportion of patients considered adherent in the star ratings program. Rates of adherence in a 2-star plan for NIDM (79%), RASA agents (83%), and statins (79%) now exceed what is commonly reported in the clinical literature. For a plan to achieve a rating of 5 stars, more than 88% of patients must be adherent to each measure. These rates suggest a ceiling effect and a reduced ability to distinguish plan performance. In addition, concerns over the potential for plans to “game” these measures have been raised. The use of mail order services, 90-day prescription refill programs, and automatic refill reminders all improve the proportion of days covered measurement but may not reflect true adherence improvements. Given potential concerns associated with the use of the existing adherence measures, it may be time to consider their replacement. One option would be to adopt a broader inventory of chronic medications to measure adherence in the program and to rotate medication categories in the program each year. It might also be time to explore measuring patient adherence to all medications that a patient uses instead of the narrow focus on the 3 existing measures. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10391096/ /pubmed/33645237 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.399 Text en Copyright © 2021, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Viewpoints
Farley, Joel F
Urick, Benjamin Y
Is it time to replace the star ratings adherence measures?
title Is it time to replace the star ratings adherence measures?
title_full Is it time to replace the star ratings adherence measures?
title_fullStr Is it time to replace the star ratings adherence measures?
title_full_unstemmed Is it time to replace the star ratings adherence measures?
title_short Is it time to replace the star ratings adherence measures?
title_sort is it time to replace the star ratings adherence measures?
topic Viewpoints
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33645237
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.399
work_keys_str_mv AT farleyjoelf isittimetoreplacethestarratingsadherencemeasures
AT urickbenjaminy isittimetoreplacethestarratingsadherencemeasures