Cargando…

Comparing total medical expenditure between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: evidence from VA-Medicare dual enrollees

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an alternative to warfarin for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of DOACs has primarily been from clinical trial settings. The real-world effectiveness of DOACs in specific nontrial populations tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Edwin S, Done, Nicolae, Zhao, Molly, Woolley, Adam B, Prentice, Julia C, Mull, Hillary J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337995
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1056
_version_ 1785082637428195328
author Wong, Edwin S
Done, Nicolae
Zhao, Molly
Woolley, Adam B
Prentice, Julia C
Mull, Hillary J
author_facet Wong, Edwin S
Done, Nicolae
Zhao, Molly
Woolley, Adam B
Prentice, Julia C
Mull, Hillary J
author_sort Wong, Edwin S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an alternative to warfarin for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of DOACs has primarily been from clinical trial settings. The real-world effectiveness of DOACs in specific nontrial populations that differ in age, comorbidity burden, and socioeconomic status is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare total downstream medical expenditure between AF patients treated with warfarin and DOACs dually enrolled in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System and fee-for-service Medicare. METHODS: This was an exploratory treatment effectiveness study that analyzed VA administrative data and Medicare claims. We examined patients with an incident diagnosis for AF and initiated warfarin or DOAC treatment between 2012 and 2015. The primary outcome was total medical expenditure over 3 years following treatment initiation. To address potential informative censoring, we applied a multipart estimator that extends traditional 2-part models to separate differences between groups due to survival and cost accumulation effects. Inverse probability weighting was applied to address potential treatment selection bias. RESULTS: We identified 31,276 and 17,021 patients receiving warfarin and DOACs, respectively. Mean unadjusted (SD) expenditure was higher for warfarin ($56,265 [$96,666]) compared with DOAC patients ($32,736 [$52,470]). Compared with patients receiving DOACs, adjusted 3-year expenditure was $25,688 (P < 0.001) higher for patients receiving warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: VA patients with AF initiating warfarin incurred markedly higher downstream expenditure compared with similar patients receiving DOACs. The benefits of DOACs found in previous clinical trials were present in this population, suggesting that these DOACs may be the preferred option for treatment of AF in older VA patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10391145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103911452023-08-02 Comparing total medical expenditure between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: evidence from VA-Medicare dual enrollees Wong, Edwin S Done, Nicolae Zhao, Molly Woolley, Adam B Prentice, Julia C Mull, Hillary J J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an alternative to warfarin for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of DOACs has primarily been from clinical trial settings. The real-world effectiveness of DOACs in specific nontrial populations that differ in age, comorbidity burden, and socioeconomic status is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare total downstream medical expenditure between AF patients treated with warfarin and DOACs dually enrolled in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System and fee-for-service Medicare. METHODS: This was an exploratory treatment effectiveness study that analyzed VA administrative data and Medicare claims. We examined patients with an incident diagnosis for AF and initiated warfarin or DOAC treatment between 2012 and 2015. The primary outcome was total medical expenditure over 3 years following treatment initiation. To address potential informative censoring, we applied a multipart estimator that extends traditional 2-part models to separate differences between groups due to survival and cost accumulation effects. Inverse probability weighting was applied to address potential treatment selection bias. RESULTS: We identified 31,276 and 17,021 patients receiving warfarin and DOACs, respectively. Mean unadjusted (SD) expenditure was higher for warfarin ($56,265 [$96,666]) compared with DOAC patients ($32,736 [$52,470]). Compared with patients receiving DOACs, adjusted 3-year expenditure was $25,688 (P < 0.001) higher for patients receiving warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: VA patients with AF initiating warfarin incurred markedly higher downstream expenditure compared with similar patients receiving DOACs. The benefits of DOACs found in previous clinical trials were present in this population, suggesting that these DOACs may be the preferred option for treatment of AF in older VA patients. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10391145/ /pubmed/34337995 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1056 Text en Copyright © 2021, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Wong, Edwin S
Done, Nicolae
Zhao, Molly
Woolley, Adam B
Prentice, Julia C
Mull, Hillary J
Comparing total medical expenditure between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: evidence from VA-Medicare dual enrollees
title Comparing total medical expenditure between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: evidence from VA-Medicare dual enrollees
title_full Comparing total medical expenditure between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: evidence from VA-Medicare dual enrollees
title_fullStr Comparing total medical expenditure between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: evidence from VA-Medicare dual enrollees
title_full_unstemmed Comparing total medical expenditure between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: evidence from VA-Medicare dual enrollees
title_short Comparing total medical expenditure between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: evidence from VA-Medicare dual enrollees
title_sort comparing total medical expenditure between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: evidence from va-medicare dual enrollees
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337995
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1056
work_keys_str_mv AT wongedwins comparingtotalmedicalexpenditurebetweenpatientsreceivingdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarinforthetreatmentofatrialfibrillationevidencefromvamedicaredualenrollees
AT donenicolae comparingtotalmedicalexpenditurebetweenpatientsreceivingdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarinforthetreatmentofatrialfibrillationevidencefromvamedicaredualenrollees
AT zhaomolly comparingtotalmedicalexpenditurebetweenpatientsreceivingdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarinforthetreatmentofatrialfibrillationevidencefromvamedicaredualenrollees
AT woolleyadamb comparingtotalmedicalexpenditurebetweenpatientsreceivingdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarinforthetreatmentofatrialfibrillationevidencefromvamedicaredualenrollees
AT prenticejuliac comparingtotalmedicalexpenditurebetweenpatientsreceivingdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarinforthetreatmentofatrialfibrillationevidencefromvamedicaredualenrollees
AT mullhillaryj comparingtotalmedicalexpenditurebetweenpatientsreceivingdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarinforthetreatmentofatrialfibrillationevidencefromvamedicaredualenrollees