Cargando…

Budget impact of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in the United States

BACKGROUND: Three novel acute treatments for migraine—lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant—were approved by the FDA in 2019 and 2020 for adults with migraine with and without aura. American Headache Society guidance recommends that these novel acute treatments be considered for patients who are co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milev, Sandra, Pohl, Gerhardt, Sun, Ariel, Mason, Oksana, Njuguna, Nancy, Loo, Li Shen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34818093
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.12.1714
_version_ 1785082642956288000
author Milev, Sandra
Pohl, Gerhardt
Sun, Ariel
Mason, Oksana
Njuguna, Nancy
Loo, Li Shen
author_facet Milev, Sandra
Pohl, Gerhardt
Sun, Ariel
Mason, Oksana
Njuguna, Nancy
Loo, Li Shen
author_sort Milev, Sandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Three novel acute treatments for migraine—lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant—were approved by the FDA in 2019 and 2020 for adults with migraine with and without aura. American Headache Society guidance recommends that these novel acute treatments be considered for patients who are contraindicated to or fail to respond or tolerate oral triptans, the current standard of acute care. OBJECTIVE: To estimate, from a US commercial plan perspective, the budget impact of adding lasmiditan as an option to a formulary that already includes ubrogepant and rimegepant. METHODS: Epidemiologic data were drawn from US Census data, the American Migraine Prevalence and Preventive study, and the first wave of the OVERCOME US survey, a web-based survey that included 21,000 patients with migraine. A model with a 3-year time horizon was built assuming that demand for the novel acute treatments would not vary based on whether lasmiditan is included in the formulary. The model examined a variety of populations, in particular beneficiaries with previous use of 1 or more oral triptans or contraindicated to triptans and beneficiaries with previous use of 2 or more oral triptans or contraindicated to triptans. Primary outcomes were the incremental differences in total cost and average cost per member per month (PMPM) between scenarios with and without lasmiditan. One-way sensitivity analyses with model parameters that were varied by plus or minus 15% were conducted to assess the effect of key parameters on the incremental total cost over 3 years. RESULTS: The addition of lasmiditan to a formulary that already includes ubrogepant and rimegepant resulted in a total savings of −$927,657 (−1.5% compared with the scenario without lasmiditan) over a 3-year time horizon in the population with previous history of using 1 or more oral triptans or contraindicated to a triptan. In the population with previous history of using 2 or more oral triptans or contraindicated, the addition of lasmiditan resulted in a total budget impact of −$466,518 (−1.3%) over a 3-year time horizon. Most of the cost savings was attributable to reductions in drug acquisition cost. Savings in total costs resulted in average incremental cost per PMPM of −0.03 and −$0.01, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of lasmiditan to the formulary as a novel acute treatment option for migraine alongside ubrogepant and rimegepant resulted in lower budget impact on a 3-year time horizon from a US commercial payer’s perspective. This result is important to US commercial payers as they seek to incorporate the emerging novel acute treatments for migraine into their benefit designs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10391167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103911672023-08-02 Budget impact of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in the United States Milev, Sandra Pohl, Gerhardt Sun, Ariel Mason, Oksana Njuguna, Nancy Loo, Li Shen J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Three novel acute treatments for migraine—lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant—were approved by the FDA in 2019 and 2020 for adults with migraine with and without aura. American Headache Society guidance recommends that these novel acute treatments be considered for patients who are contraindicated to or fail to respond or tolerate oral triptans, the current standard of acute care. OBJECTIVE: To estimate, from a US commercial plan perspective, the budget impact of adding lasmiditan as an option to a formulary that already includes ubrogepant and rimegepant. METHODS: Epidemiologic data were drawn from US Census data, the American Migraine Prevalence and Preventive study, and the first wave of the OVERCOME US survey, a web-based survey that included 21,000 patients with migraine. A model with a 3-year time horizon was built assuming that demand for the novel acute treatments would not vary based on whether lasmiditan is included in the formulary. The model examined a variety of populations, in particular beneficiaries with previous use of 1 or more oral triptans or contraindicated to triptans and beneficiaries with previous use of 2 or more oral triptans or contraindicated to triptans. Primary outcomes were the incremental differences in total cost and average cost per member per month (PMPM) between scenarios with and without lasmiditan. One-way sensitivity analyses with model parameters that were varied by plus or minus 15% were conducted to assess the effect of key parameters on the incremental total cost over 3 years. RESULTS: The addition of lasmiditan to a formulary that already includes ubrogepant and rimegepant resulted in a total savings of −$927,657 (−1.5% compared with the scenario without lasmiditan) over a 3-year time horizon in the population with previous history of using 1 or more oral triptans or contraindicated to a triptan. In the population with previous history of using 2 or more oral triptans or contraindicated, the addition of lasmiditan resulted in a total budget impact of −$466,518 (−1.3%) over a 3-year time horizon. Most of the cost savings was attributable to reductions in drug acquisition cost. Savings in total costs resulted in average incremental cost per PMPM of −0.03 and −$0.01, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of lasmiditan to the formulary as a novel acute treatment option for migraine alongside ubrogepant and rimegepant resulted in lower budget impact on a 3-year time horizon from a US commercial payer’s perspective. This result is important to US commercial payers as they seek to incorporate the emerging novel acute treatments for migraine into their benefit designs. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10391167/ /pubmed/34818093 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.12.1714 Text en Copyright © 2021, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Milev, Sandra
Pohl, Gerhardt
Sun, Ariel
Mason, Oksana
Njuguna, Nancy
Loo, Li Shen
Budget impact of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in the United States
title Budget impact of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in the United States
title_full Budget impact of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in the United States
title_fullStr Budget impact of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Budget impact of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in the United States
title_short Budget impact of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in the United States
title_sort budget impact of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in the united states
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34818093
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.12.1714
work_keys_str_mv AT milevsandra budgetimpactoflasmiditanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineintheunitedstates
AT pohlgerhardt budgetimpactoflasmiditanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineintheunitedstates
AT sunariel budgetimpactoflasmiditanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineintheunitedstates
AT masonoksana budgetimpactoflasmiditanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineintheunitedstates
AT njugunanancy budgetimpactoflasmiditanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineintheunitedstates
AT loolishen budgetimpactoflasmiditanfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineintheunitedstates