Cargando…
The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments
BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in using real-world evidence (RWE) for health technology assessment (HTA) in the United States. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) is an independent U.S.-based HTA organization that focuses primarily on pharmaceuticals. RWE is used to in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251999 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12.1590 |
_version_ | 1785082655766740992 |
---|---|
author | Jiao, Boshen Veenstra, David L Lee, Woojung Carlson, Josh J Devine, Beth |
author_facet | Jiao, Boshen Veenstra, David L Lee, Woojung Carlson, Josh J Devine, Beth |
author_sort | Jiao, Boshen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in using real-world evidence (RWE) for health technology assessment (HTA) in the United States. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) is an independent U.S.-based HTA organization that focuses primarily on pharmaceuticals. RWE is used to inform ICER’s scoping and comparative clinical effectiveness (CCE) assessments, but the extent to which it is used has not been quantified. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate use of RWE in the scoping and CCE assessment sections of the ICER HTA reports on pharmaceuticals. METHODS: We reviewed all ICER reports of pharmaceuticals published between January 2014 and June 2019. We examined the average number of instances and the proportion of RWE use in the scoping documents to inform the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, setting, or timing (PICOTS) elements of the appraisal. We also examined the average number of instances and the proportion of RWE use in the CCE assessments to inform effectiveness, safety, or treatment patterns. Finally, we evaluated use of RWE in clinical guidelines that were cited in the CCE assessments. RESULTS: In ICER scoping documents, the mean (SD) number of instances of RWE use was 3.8 (3.7) per document (55% for outcomes, 20% for population, 14% for comparator, 11% for intervention, and 0% for timing and setting). In ICER CCE assessments, the mean (SD) number of instances per assessment was 0.7 (0.5) per drug (53% for effectiveness, 44% for safety, and 3% for treatment patterns). In clinical guidelines used in ICER reports, the mean (SD) number of instances of RWE use was 1.6 (2.3) per drug per guideline (41% for effectiveness, 30% for safety, and 29% for treatment patterns). CONCLUSIONS: RWE was frequently used in the ICER scoping process, particularly to inform selection of outcomes. RWE was used infrequently in ICER CCE assessments, while more often used to inform effectiveness, safety, and treatment patterns in relevant clinical guidelines. There are opportunities to increase the use of RWE in U.S. HTA processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10391218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103912182023-08-02 The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments Jiao, Boshen Veenstra, David L Lee, Woojung Carlson, Josh J Devine, Beth J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research Brief BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in using real-world evidence (RWE) for health technology assessment (HTA) in the United States. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) is an independent U.S.-based HTA organization that focuses primarily on pharmaceuticals. RWE is used to inform ICER’s scoping and comparative clinical effectiveness (CCE) assessments, but the extent to which it is used has not been quantified. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate use of RWE in the scoping and CCE assessment sections of the ICER HTA reports on pharmaceuticals. METHODS: We reviewed all ICER reports of pharmaceuticals published between January 2014 and June 2019. We examined the average number of instances and the proportion of RWE use in the scoping documents to inform the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, setting, or timing (PICOTS) elements of the appraisal. We also examined the average number of instances and the proportion of RWE use in the CCE assessments to inform effectiveness, safety, or treatment patterns. Finally, we evaluated use of RWE in clinical guidelines that were cited in the CCE assessments. RESULTS: In ICER scoping documents, the mean (SD) number of instances of RWE use was 3.8 (3.7) per document (55% for outcomes, 20% for population, 14% for comparator, 11% for intervention, and 0% for timing and setting). In ICER CCE assessments, the mean (SD) number of instances per assessment was 0.7 (0.5) per drug (53% for effectiveness, 44% for safety, and 3% for treatment patterns). In clinical guidelines used in ICER reports, the mean (SD) number of instances of RWE use was 1.6 (2.3) per drug per guideline (41% for effectiveness, 30% for safety, and 29% for treatment patterns). CONCLUSIONS: RWE was frequently used in the ICER scoping process, particularly to inform selection of outcomes. RWE was used infrequently in ICER CCE assessments, while more often used to inform effectiveness, safety, and treatment patterns in relevant clinical guidelines. There are opportunities to increase the use of RWE in U.S. HTA processes. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10391218/ /pubmed/33251999 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12.1590 Text en Copyright © 2020, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Brief Jiao, Boshen Veenstra, David L Lee, Woojung Carlson, Josh J Devine, Beth The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments |
title | The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments |
title_full | The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments |
title_fullStr | The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments |
title_short | The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments |
title_sort | use of real-world evidence in icer’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments |
topic | Research Brief |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251999 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12.1590 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiaoboshen theuseofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments AT veenstradavidl theuseofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments AT leewoojung theuseofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments AT carlsonjoshj theuseofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments AT devinebeth theuseofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments AT jiaoboshen useofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments AT veenstradavidl useofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments AT leewoojung useofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments AT carlsonjoshj useofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments AT devinebeth useofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments |