Cargando…

The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments

BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in using real-world evidence (RWE) for health technology assessment (HTA) in the United States. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) is an independent U.S.-based HTA organization that focuses primarily on pharmaceuticals. RWE is used to in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiao, Boshen, Veenstra, David L, Lee, Woojung, Carlson, Josh J, Devine, Beth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251999
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12.1590
_version_ 1785082655766740992
author Jiao, Boshen
Veenstra, David L
Lee, Woojung
Carlson, Josh J
Devine, Beth
author_facet Jiao, Boshen
Veenstra, David L
Lee, Woojung
Carlson, Josh J
Devine, Beth
author_sort Jiao, Boshen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in using real-world evidence (RWE) for health technology assessment (HTA) in the United States. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) is an independent U.S.-based HTA organization that focuses primarily on pharmaceuticals. RWE is used to inform ICER’s scoping and comparative clinical effectiveness (CCE) assessments, but the extent to which it is used has not been quantified. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate use of RWE in the scoping and CCE assessment sections of the ICER HTA reports on pharmaceuticals. METHODS: We reviewed all ICER reports of pharmaceuticals published between January 2014 and June 2019. We examined the average number of instances and the proportion of RWE use in the scoping documents to inform the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, setting, or timing (PICOTS) elements of the appraisal. We also examined the average number of instances and the proportion of RWE use in the CCE assessments to inform effectiveness, safety, or treatment patterns. Finally, we evaluated use of RWE in clinical guidelines that were cited in the CCE assessments. RESULTS: In ICER scoping documents, the mean (SD) number of instances of RWE use was 3.8 (3.7) per document (55% for outcomes, 20% for population, 14% for comparator, 11% for intervention, and 0% for timing and setting). In ICER CCE assessments, the mean (SD) number of instances per assessment was 0.7 (0.5) per drug (53% for effectiveness, 44% for safety, and 3% for treatment patterns). In clinical guidelines used in ICER reports, the mean (SD) number of instances of RWE use was 1.6 (2.3) per drug per guideline (41% for effectiveness, 30% for safety, and 29% for treatment patterns). CONCLUSIONS: RWE was frequently used in the ICER scoping process, particularly to inform selection of outcomes. RWE was used infrequently in ICER CCE assessments, while more often used to inform effectiveness, safety, and treatment patterns in relevant clinical guidelines. There are opportunities to increase the use of RWE in U.S. HTA processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10391218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103912182023-08-02 The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments Jiao, Boshen Veenstra, David L Lee, Woojung Carlson, Josh J Devine, Beth J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research Brief BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in using real-world evidence (RWE) for health technology assessment (HTA) in the United States. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) is an independent U.S.-based HTA organization that focuses primarily on pharmaceuticals. RWE is used to inform ICER’s scoping and comparative clinical effectiveness (CCE) assessments, but the extent to which it is used has not been quantified. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate use of RWE in the scoping and CCE assessment sections of the ICER HTA reports on pharmaceuticals. METHODS: We reviewed all ICER reports of pharmaceuticals published between January 2014 and June 2019. We examined the average number of instances and the proportion of RWE use in the scoping documents to inform the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, setting, or timing (PICOTS) elements of the appraisal. We also examined the average number of instances and the proportion of RWE use in the CCE assessments to inform effectiveness, safety, or treatment patterns. Finally, we evaluated use of RWE in clinical guidelines that were cited in the CCE assessments. RESULTS: In ICER scoping documents, the mean (SD) number of instances of RWE use was 3.8 (3.7) per document (55% for outcomes, 20% for population, 14% for comparator, 11% for intervention, and 0% for timing and setting). In ICER CCE assessments, the mean (SD) number of instances per assessment was 0.7 (0.5) per drug (53% for effectiveness, 44% for safety, and 3% for treatment patterns). In clinical guidelines used in ICER reports, the mean (SD) number of instances of RWE use was 1.6 (2.3) per drug per guideline (41% for effectiveness, 30% for safety, and 29% for treatment patterns). CONCLUSIONS: RWE was frequently used in the ICER scoping process, particularly to inform selection of outcomes. RWE was used infrequently in ICER CCE assessments, while more often used to inform effectiveness, safety, and treatment patterns in relevant clinical guidelines. There are opportunities to increase the use of RWE in U.S. HTA processes. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10391218/ /pubmed/33251999 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12.1590 Text en Copyright © 2020, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Brief
Jiao, Boshen
Veenstra, David L
Lee, Woojung
Carlson, Josh J
Devine, Beth
The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments
title The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments
title_full The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments
title_fullStr The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments
title_full_unstemmed The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments
title_short The use of real-world evidence in ICER’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments
title_sort use of real-world evidence in icer’s scoping process and clinical evidence assessments
topic Research Brief
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251999
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12.1590
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaoboshen theuseofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments
AT veenstradavidl theuseofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments
AT leewoojung theuseofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments
AT carlsonjoshj theuseofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments
AT devinebeth theuseofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments
AT jiaoboshen useofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments
AT veenstradavidl useofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments
AT leewoojung useofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments
AT carlsonjoshj useofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments
AT devinebeth useofrealworldevidenceinicersscopingprocessandclinicalevidenceassessments