Cargando…

Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence in diabetes is well documented to be associated with inadequate glycemic control. Through remote blood glucose (BG) monitoring, unlimited test strip and lancet supplies, personal coaching, and online access to clinical information and educational resources, diabet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munshi, Kiraat D, Amelung, Kyle, Carter, Callie S, James, Roberta, Shah, Bimal R, Henderson, Rochelle R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34057390
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.6.724
_version_ 1785082656962117632
author Munshi, Kiraat D
Amelung, Kyle
Carter, Callie S
James, Roberta
Shah, Bimal R
Henderson, Rochelle R
author_facet Munshi, Kiraat D
Amelung, Kyle
Carter, Callie S
James, Roberta
Shah, Bimal R
Henderson, Rochelle R
author_sort Munshi, Kiraat D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence in diabetes is well documented to be associated with inadequate glycemic control. Through remote blood glucose (BG) monitoring, unlimited test strip and lancet supplies, personal coaching, and online access to clinical information and educational resources, diabetes remote monitoring (DRM) programs may provide a solution. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between patient participation in a DRM solution and adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD). METHODS: A retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using deidentified administrative claims data from a large pharmacy benefit manager. Commercially insured patients aged 18 years or older and having 2 or more 30-day adjusted OAD claims comprised the target sample. Patients enrolled in insurance plans that implemented DRM, who had at least 1 BG check (ever engaged) between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018 (exposure) were matched to patients enrolled in insurance plans that did not implement DRM (nonexposure). After a 1:2 matching on baseline demographics, disease burden proxy, total pharmacy out-of-pocket costs, previous adherence and insulin use, nonexposure group participants were assigned the same first BG check date as their matched DRM participants. Medication adherence measured as proportion of days covered (PDC) in the 365 days following first BG check was examined as a continuous and binary outcome measure (PDC > 80% or adherent vs < 80% or nonadherent). Multivariable linear and logistic regression were conducted to examine differential magnitude in adherence and likelihood of being adherent, respectively. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 6,002 exposure and 12,004 nonexposure group patients. DRM participants who were ever engaged had a 4.5% higher adherence rate (P < 0.001) and 42% higher odds of being adherent (P < 0.001) in the period after engagement compared with non-DRM participants. Sensitivity analyses showed that patients engaged continuously (> 1 BG check per week) for 3, 6, and 12 months had 5.1%, 5.2%, and 6.4% higher adherence rates, respectively (P < 0.001), and 52%, 64%, and 98% higher odds of being adherent, respectively (P < 0.001), compared with non-DRM participants. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings offer evidence that DRM engagement is associated with higher odds of medication adherence. DRM solutions that provide access to glucose test results, personalized coaching, educational resources, and lower testing supply cost can also influence adherence. Our findings have important implications for payers and patients related to improved health outcomes due to higher medication adherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10391223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103912232023-08-02 Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence Munshi, Kiraat D Amelung, Kyle Carter, Callie S James, Roberta Shah, Bimal R Henderson, Rochelle R J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence in diabetes is well documented to be associated with inadequate glycemic control. Through remote blood glucose (BG) monitoring, unlimited test strip and lancet supplies, personal coaching, and online access to clinical information and educational resources, diabetes remote monitoring (DRM) programs may provide a solution. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between patient participation in a DRM solution and adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD). METHODS: A retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using deidentified administrative claims data from a large pharmacy benefit manager. Commercially insured patients aged 18 years or older and having 2 or more 30-day adjusted OAD claims comprised the target sample. Patients enrolled in insurance plans that implemented DRM, who had at least 1 BG check (ever engaged) between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018 (exposure) were matched to patients enrolled in insurance plans that did not implement DRM (nonexposure). After a 1:2 matching on baseline demographics, disease burden proxy, total pharmacy out-of-pocket costs, previous adherence and insulin use, nonexposure group participants were assigned the same first BG check date as their matched DRM participants. Medication adherence measured as proportion of days covered (PDC) in the 365 days following first BG check was examined as a continuous and binary outcome measure (PDC > 80% or adherent vs < 80% or nonadherent). Multivariable linear and logistic regression were conducted to examine differential magnitude in adherence and likelihood of being adherent, respectively. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 6,002 exposure and 12,004 nonexposure group patients. DRM participants who were ever engaged had a 4.5% higher adherence rate (P < 0.001) and 42% higher odds of being adherent (P < 0.001) in the period after engagement compared with non-DRM participants. Sensitivity analyses showed that patients engaged continuously (> 1 BG check per week) for 3, 6, and 12 months had 5.1%, 5.2%, and 6.4% higher adherence rates, respectively (P < 0.001), and 52%, 64%, and 98% higher odds of being adherent, respectively (P < 0.001), compared with non-DRM participants. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings offer evidence that DRM engagement is associated with higher odds of medication adherence. DRM solutions that provide access to glucose test results, personalized coaching, educational resources, and lower testing supply cost can also influence adherence. Our findings have important implications for payers and patients related to improved health outcomes due to higher medication adherence. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10391223/ /pubmed/34057390 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.6.724 Text en Copyright © 2021, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Munshi, Kiraat D
Amelung, Kyle
Carter, Callie S
James, Roberta
Shah, Bimal R
Henderson, Rochelle R
Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence
title Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence
title_full Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence
title_fullStr Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence
title_short Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence
title_sort impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10391223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34057390
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.6.724
work_keys_str_mv AT munshikiraatd impactofadiabetesremotemonitoringprogramonmedicationadherence
AT amelungkyle impactofadiabetesremotemonitoringprogramonmedicationadherence
AT cartercallies impactofadiabetesremotemonitoringprogramonmedicationadherence
AT jamesroberta impactofadiabetesremotemonitoringprogramonmedicationadherence
AT shahbimalr impactofadiabetesremotemonitoringprogramonmedicationadherence
AT hendersonrocheller impactofadiabetesremotemonitoringprogramonmedicationadherence