Clinical and surgical outcomes of glaucoma drainage device tube in ciliary sulcus versus anterior chamber in North Indian glaucoma patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) insertion of tube through ciliary sulcus (CS) versus anterior chamber (AC) placement in the North Indian population METHODS: This retrospective comparative case series included 43 patients in CS group and 24 in AC group, who underwent GDD implantation, from March 2014 to February 2020. The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucoma medications, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. RESULTS: Sixty-seven eyes of 66 patients were included in study with mean follow-up of 25.04 months (range, 12–69 months) in the CS group and 17.4 months (range, 13–28 months) in the AC group. Preoperatively the two groups were similar except for postpenetrating keratoplasty glaucoma (PPKG) and pseudophakic patients, which were higher in the CS group (P < 0.05). Both groups showed statistically insignificant difference in postoperative IOP and BCVA at last follow-up (P = 0.173, P = 0.495, respectively). Postoperative complications were similar, except for corneal decompensation which was significantly higher in the AC group (P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that there was no statistically significant difference in mean IOP between the CS and AC groups at the last follow-up. CS placement of tube of GDD appears to be effective and safe technique. However, CS placement of tube resulted in lesser corneal decompensation and thus should be preferred in pseudophakic/aphakic patients, especially PPKG.