Cargando…

Poster 243: TT-TG Measurements Obtained in Weight Bearing and Non-Weight Bearing States are Different- Positioning in CT Scan Affects Treatment Selection

OBJECTIVES: There are multiple aspects of lower extremity alignment that can contribute to patellar instability. Physicians regularly consider TT-TG distance when planning treatment for patients with patellar instability. TT-TG has been classically measured on non-weight bearing magnetic resonance i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cirrincione, Peter, Price, Payton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392179/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00223
_version_ 1785082895175516160
author Cirrincione, Peter
Price, Payton
author_facet Cirrincione, Peter
Price, Payton
author_sort Cirrincione, Peter
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: There are multiple aspects of lower extremity alignment that can contribute to patellar instability. Physicians regularly consider TT-TG distance when planning treatment for patients with patellar instability. TT-TG has been classically measured on non-weight bearing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed topography (CT) scans, but more recently clinicians have been obtaining these measurements on weight bearing CT scans. Literature has not previously compared TT-TG measurements obtained in weight bearing and non-weight bearing positions. This study compares TT- TG measurements performed in weight-bearing vs. non-weight bearing positions of the same knees. METHODS: The images of patients with patellar instability who obtained weight bearing and non-weight bearing CT scans between the dates of January 1(st), 2014 and December 31(st), 2021 were measured for TT-TG distance. A paired two sample t test for means was utilized to compare the measurements. RESULTS: Thirty knees had both a weight bearing and non-weight bearing TT-TG length CT scan performed that could be used to measure TT-TG distance. The weight bearing group, with an average of 15.2 mm, was significantly greater than the non-weight bearing group, averaging 10.2 mm (p=<.0001). Additionally, the variance in measurements for knees under the weight bearing positions (37.6 mm) was more than twice as large as the variance for measurements obtained in the non-weight bearing position (16.5 mm). CONCLUSIONS: TT-TG distance is routinely used while diagnosing and planning treatment of patients with patellar instability. In this study, TT-TG distance was found to be significantly greater in the weight bearing position compared with the non-weight bearing position of the same knee. This fact is both critical to understand and useful in planning the appropriate instability procedure. Dynamic motion, rotation and axial loading play a role in patellar instability and need to be evaluated to arrive at the appropriate treatment algorithm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10392179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103921792023-08-02 Poster 243: TT-TG Measurements Obtained in Weight Bearing and Non-Weight Bearing States are Different- Positioning in CT Scan Affects Treatment Selection Cirrincione, Peter Price, Payton Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: There are multiple aspects of lower extremity alignment that can contribute to patellar instability. Physicians regularly consider TT-TG distance when planning treatment for patients with patellar instability. TT-TG has been classically measured on non-weight bearing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed topography (CT) scans, but more recently clinicians have been obtaining these measurements on weight bearing CT scans. Literature has not previously compared TT-TG measurements obtained in weight bearing and non-weight bearing positions. This study compares TT- TG measurements performed in weight-bearing vs. non-weight bearing positions of the same knees. METHODS: The images of patients with patellar instability who obtained weight bearing and non-weight bearing CT scans between the dates of January 1(st), 2014 and December 31(st), 2021 were measured for TT-TG distance. A paired two sample t test for means was utilized to compare the measurements. RESULTS: Thirty knees had both a weight bearing and non-weight bearing TT-TG length CT scan performed that could be used to measure TT-TG distance. The weight bearing group, with an average of 15.2 mm, was significantly greater than the non-weight bearing group, averaging 10.2 mm (p=<.0001). Additionally, the variance in measurements for knees under the weight bearing positions (37.6 mm) was more than twice as large as the variance for measurements obtained in the non-weight bearing position (16.5 mm). CONCLUSIONS: TT-TG distance is routinely used while diagnosing and planning treatment of patients with patellar instability. In this study, TT-TG distance was found to be significantly greater in the weight bearing position compared with the non-weight bearing position of the same knee. This fact is both critical to understand and useful in planning the appropriate instability procedure. Dynamic motion, rotation and axial loading play a role in patellar instability and need to be evaluated to arrive at the appropriate treatment algorithm. SAGE Publications 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10392179/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00223 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Cirrincione, Peter
Price, Payton
Poster 243: TT-TG Measurements Obtained in Weight Bearing and Non-Weight Bearing States are Different- Positioning in CT Scan Affects Treatment Selection
title Poster 243: TT-TG Measurements Obtained in Weight Bearing and Non-Weight Bearing States are Different- Positioning in CT Scan Affects Treatment Selection
title_full Poster 243: TT-TG Measurements Obtained in Weight Bearing and Non-Weight Bearing States are Different- Positioning in CT Scan Affects Treatment Selection
title_fullStr Poster 243: TT-TG Measurements Obtained in Weight Bearing and Non-Weight Bearing States are Different- Positioning in CT Scan Affects Treatment Selection
title_full_unstemmed Poster 243: TT-TG Measurements Obtained in Weight Bearing and Non-Weight Bearing States are Different- Positioning in CT Scan Affects Treatment Selection
title_short Poster 243: TT-TG Measurements Obtained in Weight Bearing and Non-Weight Bearing States are Different- Positioning in CT Scan Affects Treatment Selection
title_sort poster 243: tt-tg measurements obtained in weight bearing and non-weight bearing states are different- positioning in ct scan affects treatment selection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392179/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00223
work_keys_str_mv AT cirrincionepeter poster243tttgmeasurementsobtainedinweightbearingandnonweightbearingstatesaredifferentpositioninginctscanaffectstreatmentselection
AT pricepayton poster243tttgmeasurementsobtainedinweightbearingandnonweightbearingstatesaredifferentpositioninginctscanaffectstreatmentselection