Cargando…

The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) seldom fit seamlessly into a setting and are often adapted. The literature identifies practitioners’ management of fidelity and adaptations as problematic but offers little guidance. This study aimed to investigate practitioners’ perceptions of the fea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasson, Henna, Hedberg Rundgren, Emma, Strehlenert, Helena, Gärdegård, Anna, Uvhagen, Håkan, Klinga, Charlotte, Hedberg Rundgren, Åsa, von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37790175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895231189198
_version_ 1785082900957364224
author Hasson, Henna
Hedberg Rundgren, Emma
Strehlenert, Helena
Gärdegård, Anna
Uvhagen, Håkan
Klinga, Charlotte
Hedberg Rundgren, Åsa
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
author_facet Hasson, Henna
Hedberg Rundgren, Emma
Strehlenert, Helena
Gärdegård, Anna
Uvhagen, Håkan
Klinga, Charlotte
Hedberg Rundgren, Åsa
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
author_sort Hasson, Henna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) seldom fit seamlessly into a setting and are often adapted. The literature identifies practitioners’ management of fidelity and adaptations as problematic but offers little guidance. This study aimed to investigate practitioners’ perceptions of the feasibility and usability of an intervention aimed to support them in fidelity and adaptation management when working with EBIs. METHODS: The intervention, the adaptation and fidelity tool (A-FiT), was developed based on the literature, along with input from social service practitioners and social services’ Research and Development units’ personnel. The intervention consisted of two workshops where the participants were guided through a five-step process to manage fidelity and adaptations. It was tested in a longitudinal mixed-method intervention study with 103 practitioners from 19 social service units in Stockholm, Sweden. A multimethod data collection was employed, which included interviews at follow-up, questionnaires at baseline and follow-up (readiness for change and self-rated knowledge), workshop evaluation questionnaires (usability and feasibility) after each workshop, and documentation (participants’ notes on worksheets). To analyze the data, qualitative content analysis, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed. RESULTS: Overall, the practitioners had a positive perception of the intervention and perceived it as relevant for fidelity and adaptation management (mean ratings over 7.0 on usability and feasibility). The workshops also provided new knowledge and skills to manage fidelity and adaptations. Furthermore, the intervention provided insights into the practitioners’ understanding about adaptation and fidelity through a more reflective approach. CONCLUSION: Practical tools are needed to guide professionals not only to adhere to intervention core elements but also to help them to manage fidelity and adaptation. The proposed A-FiT intervention for practitioners’ management of both fidelity and adaptation is a novel contribution to the implementation literature. Potentially, the next step is an evaluation of the intervention's impact in an experimental design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10392202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103922022023-10-03 The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study Hasson, Henna Hedberg Rundgren, Emma Strehlenert, Helena Gärdegård, Anna Uvhagen, Håkan Klinga, Charlotte Hedberg Rundgren, Åsa von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica Implement Res Pract Original Empirical Research BACKGROUND: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) seldom fit seamlessly into a setting and are often adapted. The literature identifies practitioners’ management of fidelity and adaptations as problematic but offers little guidance. This study aimed to investigate practitioners’ perceptions of the feasibility and usability of an intervention aimed to support them in fidelity and adaptation management when working with EBIs. METHODS: The intervention, the adaptation and fidelity tool (A-FiT), was developed based on the literature, along with input from social service practitioners and social services’ Research and Development units’ personnel. The intervention consisted of two workshops where the participants were guided through a five-step process to manage fidelity and adaptations. It was tested in a longitudinal mixed-method intervention study with 103 practitioners from 19 social service units in Stockholm, Sweden. A multimethod data collection was employed, which included interviews at follow-up, questionnaires at baseline and follow-up (readiness for change and self-rated knowledge), workshop evaluation questionnaires (usability and feasibility) after each workshop, and documentation (participants’ notes on worksheets). To analyze the data, qualitative content analysis, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed. RESULTS: Overall, the practitioners had a positive perception of the intervention and perceived it as relevant for fidelity and adaptation management (mean ratings over 7.0 on usability and feasibility). The workshops also provided new knowledge and skills to manage fidelity and adaptations. Furthermore, the intervention provided insights into the practitioners’ understanding about adaptation and fidelity through a more reflective approach. CONCLUSION: Practical tools are needed to guide professionals not only to adhere to intervention core elements but also to help them to manage fidelity and adaptation. The proposed A-FiT intervention for practitioners’ management of both fidelity and adaptation is a novel contribution to the implementation literature. Potentially, the next step is an evaluation of the intervention's impact in an experimental design. SAGE Publications 2023-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10392202/ /pubmed/37790175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895231189198 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Empirical Research
Hasson, Henna
Hedberg Rundgren, Emma
Strehlenert, Helena
Gärdegård, Anna
Uvhagen, Håkan
Klinga, Charlotte
Hedberg Rundgren, Åsa
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study
title The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study
title_full The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study
title_fullStr The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study
title_full_unstemmed The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study
title_short The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study
title_sort adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study
topic Original Empirical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37790175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895231189198
work_keys_str_mv AT hassonhenna theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT hedbergrundgrenemma theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT strehlenerthelena theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT gardegardanna theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT uvhagenhakan theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT klingacharlotte theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT hedbergrundgrenasa theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT vonthieleschwarzulrica theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT hassonhenna adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT hedbergrundgrenemma adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT strehlenerthelena adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT gardegardanna adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT uvhagenhakan adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT klingacharlotte adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT hedbergrundgrenasa adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy
AT vonthieleschwarzulrica adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy