Cargando…
The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) seldom fit seamlessly into a setting and are often adapted. The literature identifies practitioners’ management of fidelity and adaptations as problematic but offers little guidance. This study aimed to investigate practitioners’ perceptions of the fea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37790175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895231189198 |
_version_ | 1785082900957364224 |
---|---|
author | Hasson, Henna Hedberg Rundgren, Emma Strehlenert, Helena Gärdegård, Anna Uvhagen, Håkan Klinga, Charlotte Hedberg Rundgren, Åsa von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica |
author_facet | Hasson, Henna Hedberg Rundgren, Emma Strehlenert, Helena Gärdegård, Anna Uvhagen, Håkan Klinga, Charlotte Hedberg Rundgren, Åsa von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica |
author_sort | Hasson, Henna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) seldom fit seamlessly into a setting and are often adapted. The literature identifies practitioners’ management of fidelity and adaptations as problematic but offers little guidance. This study aimed to investigate practitioners’ perceptions of the feasibility and usability of an intervention aimed to support them in fidelity and adaptation management when working with EBIs. METHODS: The intervention, the adaptation and fidelity tool (A-FiT), was developed based on the literature, along with input from social service practitioners and social services’ Research and Development units’ personnel. The intervention consisted of two workshops where the participants were guided through a five-step process to manage fidelity and adaptations. It was tested in a longitudinal mixed-method intervention study with 103 practitioners from 19 social service units in Stockholm, Sweden. A multimethod data collection was employed, which included interviews at follow-up, questionnaires at baseline and follow-up (readiness for change and self-rated knowledge), workshop evaluation questionnaires (usability and feasibility) after each workshop, and documentation (participants’ notes on worksheets). To analyze the data, qualitative content analysis, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed. RESULTS: Overall, the practitioners had a positive perception of the intervention and perceived it as relevant for fidelity and adaptation management (mean ratings over 7.0 on usability and feasibility). The workshops also provided new knowledge and skills to manage fidelity and adaptations. Furthermore, the intervention provided insights into the practitioners’ understanding about adaptation and fidelity through a more reflective approach. CONCLUSION: Practical tools are needed to guide professionals not only to adhere to intervention core elements but also to help them to manage fidelity and adaptation. The proposed A-FiT intervention for practitioners’ management of both fidelity and adaptation is a novel contribution to the implementation literature. Potentially, the next step is an evaluation of the intervention's impact in an experimental design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10392202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103922022023-10-03 The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study Hasson, Henna Hedberg Rundgren, Emma Strehlenert, Helena Gärdegård, Anna Uvhagen, Håkan Klinga, Charlotte Hedberg Rundgren, Åsa von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica Implement Res Pract Original Empirical Research BACKGROUND: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) seldom fit seamlessly into a setting and are often adapted. The literature identifies practitioners’ management of fidelity and adaptations as problematic but offers little guidance. This study aimed to investigate practitioners’ perceptions of the feasibility and usability of an intervention aimed to support them in fidelity and adaptation management when working with EBIs. METHODS: The intervention, the adaptation and fidelity tool (A-FiT), was developed based on the literature, along with input from social service practitioners and social services’ Research and Development units’ personnel. The intervention consisted of two workshops where the participants were guided through a five-step process to manage fidelity and adaptations. It was tested in a longitudinal mixed-method intervention study with 103 practitioners from 19 social service units in Stockholm, Sweden. A multimethod data collection was employed, which included interviews at follow-up, questionnaires at baseline and follow-up (readiness for change and self-rated knowledge), workshop evaluation questionnaires (usability and feasibility) after each workshop, and documentation (participants’ notes on worksheets). To analyze the data, qualitative content analysis, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed. RESULTS: Overall, the practitioners had a positive perception of the intervention and perceived it as relevant for fidelity and adaptation management (mean ratings over 7.0 on usability and feasibility). The workshops also provided new knowledge and skills to manage fidelity and adaptations. Furthermore, the intervention provided insights into the practitioners’ understanding about adaptation and fidelity through a more reflective approach. CONCLUSION: Practical tools are needed to guide professionals not only to adhere to intervention core elements but also to help them to manage fidelity and adaptation. The proposed A-FiT intervention for practitioners’ management of both fidelity and adaptation is a novel contribution to the implementation literature. Potentially, the next step is an evaluation of the intervention's impact in an experimental design. SAGE Publications 2023-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10392202/ /pubmed/37790175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895231189198 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Empirical Research Hasson, Henna Hedberg Rundgren, Emma Strehlenert, Helena Gärdegård, Anna Uvhagen, Håkan Klinga, Charlotte Hedberg Rundgren, Åsa von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study |
title | The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study |
title_full | The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study |
title_fullStr | The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study |
title_full_unstemmed | The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study |
title_short | The adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: Longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study |
title_sort | adaptation and fidelity tool to support social service practitioners in balancing fidelity and adaptations: longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation study |
topic | Original Empirical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37790175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895231189198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hassonhenna theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT hedbergrundgrenemma theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT strehlenerthelena theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT gardegardanna theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT uvhagenhakan theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT klingacharlotte theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT hedbergrundgrenasa theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT vonthieleschwarzulrica theadaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT hassonhenna adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT hedbergrundgrenemma adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT strehlenerthelena adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT gardegardanna adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT uvhagenhakan adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT klingacharlotte adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT hedbergrundgrenasa adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy AT vonthieleschwarzulrica adaptationandfidelitytooltosupportsocialservicepractitionersinbalancingfidelityandadaptationslongitudinalmixedmethodevaluationstudy |