Cargando…

Poster 244: A Retrospective Analysis of Bucket Handle Meniscus Tear Repair Outcomes

OBJECTIVES: Bucket handle meniscal tears are a challenging clinical entity with a failure rate as high as 34.5%, which is in stark contrast from the estimated 5% for more simple tear patterns. There are limited data on patient or surgical factors that affect failure. The purpose of this study is to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Puneet, Reynolds, Alan, Taber, Caroline, Saltzman, Bryan, Popkin, Charles, Trofa, David, Mehta, Apoorva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392246/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00224
_version_ 1785082912581877760
author Gupta, Puneet
Reynolds, Alan
Taber, Caroline
Saltzman, Bryan
Popkin, Charles
Trofa, David
Mehta, Apoorva
author_facet Gupta, Puneet
Reynolds, Alan
Taber, Caroline
Saltzman, Bryan
Popkin, Charles
Trofa, David
Mehta, Apoorva
author_sort Gupta, Puneet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Bucket handle meniscal tears are a challenging clinical entity with a failure rate as high as 34.5%, which is in stark contrast from the estimated 5% for more simple tear patterns. There are limited data on patient or surgical factors that affect failure. The purpose of this study is to characterize patient and surgical variables that impact two main outcomes: return to sport and revision surgery following surgical repair for bucket handle meniscus tears. METHODS: A retrospective review of all meniscus repairs from 1/1/11 to 1/1/21 was performed for a single institution, and all bucket handle meniscus repairs were included in the study. Demographic information was collected along with injury characteristics and surgical techniques. Outcomes included return to sport and need for revision surgery. Patients with more than 50% of data missing for the variables of interest were removed from the study. Patients without follow-up notes were excluded from return to sport analysis. Failure rate was defined by either a documented re-tear of the former bucket handle meniscus or a revision surgery. RESULTS: There were 205 patients included in the final analysis, with an average of age of 24.42 and 76.39% male, with an average follow-up time of 12.52 months. Demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Operative characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Of the 117 patients that played sports with available follow-up data, 90 (76.9%) returned to sport and 27 did not (23.1%) with an average follow-up time of 15.01 months. Average return to sport time was 7.21 months +/- 3.77 months. Twelve (13.8%) patients that returned to sport and 12 (44.4%) of the patients who did not underwent future meniscectomy or revision repair surgery. Overall failure rate was 19.0%. The rate of failure of combined all-inside and outside-in technique (33.33%) was higher than rate of failure in all-inside technique alone (14.17%). In a bivariate analysis of risk factors for failure, the variables for age, sex, smoking, BMI, ASA classification, mechanism of injury, and symptom duration before surgery were not found to be statistically significantly different between patients who failed and did not fail repair. CONCLUSIONS: The overall return to sport rate after bucket handle meniscus tear repair in this study was found to be 76.9 with an average return to sport time of 7.21 months. The overall failure rate was found to be 19.0% with an average follow-up time of 12.52 months. Further studies are needed to better understand outcomes following bucket handle meniscus repairs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10392246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103922462023-08-02 Poster 244: A Retrospective Analysis of Bucket Handle Meniscus Tear Repair Outcomes Gupta, Puneet Reynolds, Alan Taber, Caroline Saltzman, Bryan Popkin, Charles Trofa, David Mehta, Apoorva Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Bucket handle meniscal tears are a challenging clinical entity with a failure rate as high as 34.5%, which is in stark contrast from the estimated 5% for more simple tear patterns. There are limited data on patient or surgical factors that affect failure. The purpose of this study is to characterize patient and surgical variables that impact two main outcomes: return to sport and revision surgery following surgical repair for bucket handle meniscus tears. METHODS: A retrospective review of all meniscus repairs from 1/1/11 to 1/1/21 was performed for a single institution, and all bucket handle meniscus repairs were included in the study. Demographic information was collected along with injury characteristics and surgical techniques. Outcomes included return to sport and need for revision surgery. Patients with more than 50% of data missing for the variables of interest were removed from the study. Patients without follow-up notes were excluded from return to sport analysis. Failure rate was defined by either a documented re-tear of the former bucket handle meniscus or a revision surgery. RESULTS: There were 205 patients included in the final analysis, with an average of age of 24.42 and 76.39% male, with an average follow-up time of 12.52 months. Demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Operative characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Of the 117 patients that played sports with available follow-up data, 90 (76.9%) returned to sport and 27 did not (23.1%) with an average follow-up time of 15.01 months. Average return to sport time was 7.21 months +/- 3.77 months. Twelve (13.8%) patients that returned to sport and 12 (44.4%) of the patients who did not underwent future meniscectomy or revision repair surgery. Overall failure rate was 19.0%. The rate of failure of combined all-inside and outside-in technique (33.33%) was higher than rate of failure in all-inside technique alone (14.17%). In a bivariate analysis of risk factors for failure, the variables for age, sex, smoking, BMI, ASA classification, mechanism of injury, and symptom duration before surgery were not found to be statistically significantly different between patients who failed and did not fail repair. CONCLUSIONS: The overall return to sport rate after bucket handle meniscus tear repair in this study was found to be 76.9 with an average return to sport time of 7.21 months. The overall failure rate was found to be 19.0% with an average follow-up time of 12.52 months. Further studies are needed to better understand outcomes following bucket handle meniscus repairs. SAGE Publications 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10392246/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00224 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Gupta, Puneet
Reynolds, Alan
Taber, Caroline
Saltzman, Bryan
Popkin, Charles
Trofa, David
Mehta, Apoorva
Poster 244: A Retrospective Analysis of Bucket Handle Meniscus Tear Repair Outcomes
title Poster 244: A Retrospective Analysis of Bucket Handle Meniscus Tear Repair Outcomes
title_full Poster 244: A Retrospective Analysis of Bucket Handle Meniscus Tear Repair Outcomes
title_fullStr Poster 244: A Retrospective Analysis of Bucket Handle Meniscus Tear Repair Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Poster 244: A Retrospective Analysis of Bucket Handle Meniscus Tear Repair Outcomes
title_short Poster 244: A Retrospective Analysis of Bucket Handle Meniscus Tear Repair Outcomes
title_sort poster 244: a retrospective analysis of bucket handle meniscus tear repair outcomes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392246/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00224
work_keys_str_mv AT guptapuneet poster244aretrospectiveanalysisofbuckethandlemeniscustearrepairoutcomes
AT reynoldsalan poster244aretrospectiveanalysisofbuckethandlemeniscustearrepairoutcomes
AT tabercaroline poster244aretrospectiveanalysisofbuckethandlemeniscustearrepairoutcomes
AT saltzmanbryan poster244aretrospectiveanalysisofbuckethandlemeniscustearrepairoutcomes
AT popkincharles poster244aretrospectiveanalysisofbuckethandlemeniscustearrepairoutcomes
AT trofadavid poster244aretrospectiveanalysisofbuckethandlemeniscustearrepairoutcomes
AT mehtaapoorva poster244aretrospectiveanalysisofbuckethandlemeniscustearrepairoutcomes