Cargando…

Paper 27: Preoperative Risk Factors of Subsequent Ipsilateral ACL Revision Surgery following an ACL Restoration Procedure

OBJECTIVES: To identify the preoperative risk factors for revision ACL surgery within the first two years after BEAR ACL repair procedure. METHODS: Data from the prospective BEAR I, II, and III trials were used to determine preoperative risk factors for ACL revision surgery. All subjects with a comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanborn, Ryan, Badger, Gary, Fleming, Braden, Kiapour, Ata, Murray, Martha, Yen, Yi-Meng, Kramer, Dennis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392289/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00053
_version_ 1785082922940760064
author Sanborn, Ryan
Badger, Gary
Fleming, Braden
Kiapour, Ata
Murray, Martha
Yen, Yi-Meng
Kramer, Dennis
author_facet Sanborn, Ryan
Badger, Gary
Fleming, Braden
Kiapour, Ata
Murray, Martha
Yen, Yi-Meng
Kramer, Dennis
author_sort Sanborn, Ryan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify the preoperative risk factors for revision ACL surgery within the first two years after BEAR ACL repair procedure. METHODS: Data from the prospective BEAR I, II, and III trials were used to determine preoperative risk factors for ACL revision surgery. All subjects with a complete ACL tear (ages between 13-47 years, depending on the trial), who passed all other inclusion/exclusion trial criteria, and underwent a primary BEAR procedure within 30-50 days from injury (dependent on trial) were included. Demographic data (age, sex, BMI), baseline patient-reported outcomes (IKDC Subjective Score, Marx Activity score), pre-operative imaging characteristics (ACL stump length, notch size, tibial slopes), and intraoperative findings (knee hyperextension, meniscal tear status) were evaluated to determine their contribution to ipsilateral revision ACL surgery risk. RESULTS: 123 subjects, median age 17.6 years (IQR 16-23), including 67 (54%) females, met study criteria. 18 (15%) patients required revision ACL surgery in the first two years following the BEAR procedure. In bivariate analyses, younger age (p=.011), having a contact injury at the time of the initial tear (p=.048), and increased medial tibial slope (p=.029) were associated with a higher risk of ipsilateral revision surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified two independent predictors of revision: patient age and medial tibial slope. The odds of an ipsilateral revision surgery were decreased by 32% for each one-year increase in age (OR=0.684, 95% CI = 0.517 to 0.905, p=.008), and increased by 28% per each degree of increase in medial tibial slope (OR=1.280, 95% CI =1.024 to 1.601, p=.030). Sex, baseline IKDC or Marx score, knee hyperextension, or meniscus status were not significant predictors of revision. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age and higher medial tibial slope were predictors of increased odds of ipsilateral ACL revision surgery after the BEAR procedure. Younger patients with higher tibial slopes should be aware of the increased risk for revision surgery when deciding to undergo ACL restoration surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10392289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103922892023-08-02 Paper 27: Preoperative Risk Factors of Subsequent Ipsilateral ACL Revision Surgery following an ACL Restoration Procedure Sanborn, Ryan Badger, Gary Fleming, Braden Kiapour, Ata Murray, Martha Yen, Yi-Meng Kramer, Dennis Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: To identify the preoperative risk factors for revision ACL surgery within the first two years after BEAR ACL repair procedure. METHODS: Data from the prospective BEAR I, II, and III trials were used to determine preoperative risk factors for ACL revision surgery. All subjects with a complete ACL tear (ages between 13-47 years, depending on the trial), who passed all other inclusion/exclusion trial criteria, and underwent a primary BEAR procedure within 30-50 days from injury (dependent on trial) were included. Demographic data (age, sex, BMI), baseline patient-reported outcomes (IKDC Subjective Score, Marx Activity score), pre-operative imaging characteristics (ACL stump length, notch size, tibial slopes), and intraoperative findings (knee hyperextension, meniscal tear status) were evaluated to determine their contribution to ipsilateral revision ACL surgery risk. RESULTS: 123 subjects, median age 17.6 years (IQR 16-23), including 67 (54%) females, met study criteria. 18 (15%) patients required revision ACL surgery in the first two years following the BEAR procedure. In bivariate analyses, younger age (p=.011), having a contact injury at the time of the initial tear (p=.048), and increased medial tibial slope (p=.029) were associated with a higher risk of ipsilateral revision surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified two independent predictors of revision: patient age and medial tibial slope. The odds of an ipsilateral revision surgery were decreased by 32% for each one-year increase in age (OR=0.684, 95% CI = 0.517 to 0.905, p=.008), and increased by 28% per each degree of increase in medial tibial slope (OR=1.280, 95% CI =1.024 to 1.601, p=.030). Sex, baseline IKDC or Marx score, knee hyperextension, or meniscus status were not significant predictors of revision. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age and higher medial tibial slope were predictors of increased odds of ipsilateral ACL revision surgery after the BEAR procedure. Younger patients with higher tibial slopes should be aware of the increased risk for revision surgery when deciding to undergo ACL restoration surgery. SAGE Publications 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10392289/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00053 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Sanborn, Ryan
Badger, Gary
Fleming, Braden
Kiapour, Ata
Murray, Martha
Yen, Yi-Meng
Kramer, Dennis
Paper 27: Preoperative Risk Factors of Subsequent Ipsilateral ACL Revision Surgery following an ACL Restoration Procedure
title Paper 27: Preoperative Risk Factors of Subsequent Ipsilateral ACL Revision Surgery following an ACL Restoration Procedure
title_full Paper 27: Preoperative Risk Factors of Subsequent Ipsilateral ACL Revision Surgery following an ACL Restoration Procedure
title_fullStr Paper 27: Preoperative Risk Factors of Subsequent Ipsilateral ACL Revision Surgery following an ACL Restoration Procedure
title_full_unstemmed Paper 27: Preoperative Risk Factors of Subsequent Ipsilateral ACL Revision Surgery following an ACL Restoration Procedure
title_short Paper 27: Preoperative Risk Factors of Subsequent Ipsilateral ACL Revision Surgery following an ACL Restoration Procedure
title_sort paper 27: preoperative risk factors of subsequent ipsilateral acl revision surgery following an acl restoration procedure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392289/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00053
work_keys_str_mv AT sanbornryan paper27preoperativeriskfactorsofsubsequentipsilateralaclrevisionsurgeryfollowinganaclrestorationprocedure
AT badgergary paper27preoperativeriskfactorsofsubsequentipsilateralaclrevisionsurgeryfollowinganaclrestorationprocedure
AT flemingbraden paper27preoperativeriskfactorsofsubsequentipsilateralaclrevisionsurgeryfollowinganaclrestorationprocedure
AT kiapourata paper27preoperativeriskfactorsofsubsequentipsilateralaclrevisionsurgeryfollowinganaclrestorationprocedure
AT murraymartha paper27preoperativeriskfactorsofsubsequentipsilateralaclrevisionsurgeryfollowinganaclrestorationprocedure
AT yenyimeng paper27preoperativeriskfactorsofsubsequentipsilateralaclrevisionsurgeryfollowinganaclrestorationprocedure
AT kramerdennis paper27preoperativeriskfactorsofsubsequentipsilateralaclrevisionsurgeryfollowinganaclrestorationprocedure